Richard Shih

Richard Shih

DPReview Administrator
Lives in United States Seattle, WA, United States
Joined on Oct 4, 2003

Comments

Total: 464, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (971 comments in total)
In reply to:

syberman7: Don't like the new comments section design at all - very messy. Please don't change things for change's sake.

@blurredvision Everything back then was better.

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 22:29 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (971 comments in total)
In reply to:

syberman7: Don't like the new comments section design at all - very messy. Please don't change things for change's sake.

@blurredvision: You could always take your like back by clicking the button again. The feedback to indicate you liked a comment was always recessed however. Also, it was more difficult to scan quickly and find the highly liked comments. The reply button at the top and bottom of a thread was also there before as well. :)

@syberman7, ThePhilips: What specifically are you not a fan of? Personally I find Disqus' layout to be confusing.

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 22:14 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (971 comments in total)
In reply to:

JakeB: I'm lost.

Could someone please tell me how I can reply to another person's post?

@Terkwoiz: The mobile version has not been changed.

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 22:08 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (971 comments in total)
In reply to:

JakeB: I'm lost.

Could someone please tell me how I can reply to another person's post?

@JakeB: As Terkwoiz pointed out, you use the the blue reply button or the grey reply link at the bottom of a thread. Nothing's changed from the old functionality; the reply button has just moved from the right to the bottom of the first message.

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 22:07 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (971 comments in total)
In reply to:

Peiasdf: What happened to the comment section? How do I sort by time now?

@Peiasdf: Oldest first has been re-added (right-most tab).

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 22:04 UTC
On article Back to the action: Nikon D500 Review (971 comments in total)
In reply to:

GabrielZ: 91%! I think that's the highest score DPReview has ever given to a camera.

Correct. <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews?sort=rating">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews?sort=rating</a>

Link | Posted on May 26, 2016 at 05:38 UTC
On article Beta: try out our new 'light' color scheme (665 comments in total)
In reply to:

pictureAngst: Looking good, although you might want to consider setting the side margins to a slightly darker grey to reduce overall glare.
Also, have you accessibility tested the blue text to ensure adequate contrast with the white bg?

Thanks for the feedback re: the blue color. As for the accessibility guidelines, it does not satisfy: http://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/?fcolor=39d&bcolor=fff I'll circle back with the team and see about increasing the contrast.

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2016 at 23:52 UTC
On article Beta: try out our new 'light' color scheme (665 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hiphopapotamus: Why are we still stuck with a forum designed for the 1990s in 2016? It's time to drop the hand-coded monolithic nonsense and move to a real forum package.

Thanks.

What features are your most desiring?

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2016 at 23:47 UTC
On article Look Sharp: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85/GX80 video preview (130 comments in total)
In reply to:

MrTaikitso: Do you have to have a beard to work at DPreview? ;)

Market calls for a hispstermatic custom themed camera for the cereal cafe crowd. Pentax? Your move guys!

Barman, mine's a manly silver GX8, shaven but not 5 axis stirred.

I'll show myself out...

Oh. :(

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2016 at 18:34 UTC
On article Beta: try out our new 'light' color scheme (665 comments in total)
In reply to:

KCook: Interesting choice. But the faint teal background gives this site a "me too" look. Either make the background White, or some tint a little darker than this.

Fussy

The background is a light grey. No teal at all.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2016 at 00:48 UTC
On article Beta: try out our new 'light' color scheme (665 comments in total)
In reply to:

arhmatic: I'd leave both, with the toggle button, just like you have it.
Don't try to make one fit all, people will always whine.

@herbert68 Yes. Soon.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2016 at 00:03 UTC
On article Beta: try out our new 'light' color scheme (665 comments in total)
In reply to:

Greg Van Deusen: I like both backgrounds, but here's something no one has posted yet- I believe white will run down your battery faster than black on a laptop or tablet. Something to keep in mind when you're down to one bar!

Thanks for continuing to read DPR when you're down to one bar on your device!

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2016 at 00:00 UTC
In reply to:

The Squire: An f2.8 lens made a lot of sense in front of the 1" sensor. You got effective light gathering and DoF control that was on-par with an APSC DSLR with superzoom - With overall IQ being probably a bit better, good build quality and a more convenient package.

With this lens, the camera is back in traditional bridge-camera territory. A good bridge camera, but no longer a DSLR alternative.

RX10 III vs. your example:

- 24-600mm vs. 27-450mm
- 1051g (2.32lb) vs. 1225g (2.70lb)
- 5" vs. ~6.9" depth

The Nikon depth is just adding the two depths together ignoring the overlap that goes into the body.

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 21:01 UTC
On article Opinion: Enthusiast compacts have finally come of age (494 comments in total)
In reply to:

matthew saville: The Sony RX100 and RX10 have already been filling this category extremely well, with the RX100 hitting 24-70 equivalent and f/2-2.8, and the RX10 hitting 24-200 at a constant f/2.8, which for the size and weight is downright impressive.

I just felt like pointing that out, since there's an error (misspeak? missunderstanding?) about none of the existing (December) compacts going longer than 100mm equivalent.

Having said that, as a landscape & nightscape photographer, the Nikon DL 18-50 is definitely the choice for me.

@BarnET: "As luck would have it, the camera I'd been waiting for showed up on <b>January 5th</b>: the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100."

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 18:11 UTC
On article Opinion: Enthusiast compacts have finally come of age (494 comments in total)
In reply to:

matthew saville: The Sony RX100 and RX10 have already been filling this category extremely well, with the RX100 hitting 24-70 equivalent and f/2-2.8, and the RX10 hitting 24-200 at a constant f/2.8, which for the size and weight is downright impressive.

I just felt like pointing that out, since there's an error (misspeak? missunderstanding?) about none of the existing (December) compacts going longer than 100mm equivalent.

Having said that, as a landscape & nightscape photographer, the Nikon DL 18-50 is definitely the choice for me.

None of the existing December compacts could fit in a purse and go over 100mm.

Link | Posted on Mar 1, 2016 at 00:02 UTC
On article Polaroid launches Eyeball panoramic tripod head (19 comments in total)

Try getting that through airport security...

Link | Posted on Feb 26, 2016 at 19:55 UTC as 11th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

yslee1: Digital zoom for the wide angle module that is only 8mp?

Also, at 135 degrees FoV, it's either an 8mm equivalent or a semi-fisheye like those action cameras.

Which Kodak compact did...? ;)

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 17:12 UTC
In reply to:

yslee1: Digital zoom for the wide angle module that is only 8mp?

Also, at 135 degrees FoV, it's either an 8mm equivalent or a semi-fisheye like those action cameras.

Kodak did something similar back in the day. Two (zoom) lens for a single sensor with folded optics and a transition between the two. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/kodakv610/2

Link | Posted on Feb 22, 2016 at 17:37 UTC
Total: 464, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »