Cyber-espionage features are built in for free.
Ken Rocket: how many shades of gray does it have? I want more than 256.
Fifty ought to be enough for everybody.
Silver award? Buuuurn.
Jim Evidon: Found this morning on the Leica website:
Additionally, I have seen a letter address to the Leica Users Forum(http://www.l-camera-forum.com) from Leica Product Management extendingsensor replacements to those already replaced that may have recurring corrosion as well as a refund to those customers who paid for replacement in the past.
I suspect that those of you who speculate that Leica will leave their customers in the lurch have been stung by past behavior of other camera companies; more likely those considered the big four. I have yet to see any such comments from people who actually own Leica manufactured cameras.
But I do expect to see continuing back biting by those who have nothing better to do than vent your spleen without any first hand knowledge of the subject you seem to hate . So pour it on if it makes you feel important.
@carpediem007 because I enjoy that magic moment when someone's incompetence becomes obvious.
@NetMage yes, I have. I owned an M9, which was pretty bad when lighting was less than perfect (purple blotches in lips under fluorescent lighting, anyone?). Lenses I had with it were breathtaking (Summiluxes), but camera was total garbage. I also had a D700 at the time (have D810 now), and coming back to it felt like freakin' space age. I do use an iPhone, and I do have a MacBook. The difference is, Apple has more than just brand, it also has technical excellence to go with it. Leica only has excellence when it comes to optics. I wouldn't take their bodies for free.
>> stung by past behavior of other camera companies
Such as Leica, who released a defective sensor in M8, and then just sent an IR filter to its customers to "take care" of the problem, without replacing the sensor with the one that has a filter built in. If that's not epic fail, then I don't know what is.
I'm now waiting eagerly for the fail in Typ 240, because with such an illustrious history of fail there has to be something wrong with it, aside from the lack of AF and proper metering.
Facepalm. Leica should just give up already, and re-brand itself as a third party lens manufacturer.
How times have changed. Sony completely dominates the list.
ekaton: Waiting for the A7rIII with IS, silent shutter and touch screen.
And the actual lens lineup worth a damn.
photogeek: Does anyone actually use the "DOF preview button", especially on APS-C bodies with tiny viewfinders? Why is it even worth a mention? You can't tell the effect in the viewfinder anyway, not to the extent that you'd be able to tell how sharp the background would be.
@armandino you should check out a viewfinder on a FF body or a mirrorless camera. APS-C DSLR viewfinders are such a non-starter.
Does anyone actually use the "DOF preview button", especially on APS-C bodies with tiny viewfinders? Why is it even worth a mention? You can't tell the effect in the viewfinder anyway, not to the extent that you'd be able to tell how sharp the background would be.
ProfHankD: Not something I'd be buying, but it's good to see Canon doing something innovative. It does make the 4-pound Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX DG HSM look small, light, fast, and cheap, but cinema lenses are never cheap and this does have 2X the focal range of the "Bigma" not counting the teleconverter. ;-)
Also works well for weightlifting, for biceps, back, and forearms in particular. Given its dual purpose, it's a steal at that price.
What's up with all the shovel-sized phones as of late? How do you even carry something like this if it doesn't fit in the pocket?
bluevellet: Cool promo video.
I like that the lens doesn't extend when zooming, great for weather sealing and basically makes the lens a little shorter than the kit zoom (40-150 f4-5.6) when zoomed all the way in.
Snap focus ring, retractable hood and close focusing distance are nice bonuses.
IQ and AF remains to be seen, but looks promising on paper.
The beard on that guy is, shall we say, misguided.
Guy Swarbrick: Incrementally, not dramatically increased. There are far more Android phones out there than yPhones.
That's too simplistic a view. It is well known that iPhone users use their iPhones as _smartphones_ a lot more. AppStore still sells a ton more apps and makes more money, iOS devices dominate when it comes to mobile web traffic. So it's a bigger deal than it seems.
TylerQ: Just love reading all the whining about this issue that affects a small number of cameras used in a way the majority of photographer don't use it.
As far as I can tell, almost all cameras released thus far are affected, including mine. So it's a "small number", but only because a small number of cameras has been sold so far.
stdavid: Until very recently sharks have withstood the impressive test of 400 million years of rigorous evolution. Unless humans stop the senseless slaughter of these magnificent creatures many species could well face extinction in our lifetime. Extinction means forever.Great photos
_We_ are now the top predator in the food chain. So we don't need to worry about their reduced numbers. Last I checked, humans also eat fish quite happily.
Prairie Pal: 6 identical pictures of kids pointing weapons with the same unbelievable "green-screen" open mouth expressions, and fanged monsters added in post. I wouldn't say this is a new DPreview low, but really don't you have better things to with your time than repost crap like this? Don't you have camera reviews to catch up on? Looking at this is like Canadian Tire money; the second after you exit the store you throw it away.
Says the guy with this "stunning" art to his name: http://www.dpreview.com/members/2305010268/galleries
photogeek: Too bad most of their lenses have noisy, slow motors and are worthless for fast moving subjects. FWIW, I ended up going with MFT after trying both X-T1 and E-M1 side by side. E-M1 is just much better made and all their lenses (at least all I have tried) have ultrasonic motors. The only real flaw that I could see in Oly lineup is their 17mm f/1.8 lens, which, while not that bad in absolute terms, is not that good either, and worse than their f/2.8 zoom.
Still, though, would it kill them if they put ultrasonic motors into everything, like Oly did?
Optical quality, maybe, by a hair. Mechanical - nope. Also, Fuji primes are about twice as large than their Oly counterparts, and quite a bit heavier, too.