Impressive... but what on earth do you do with 100 mp? Do you crop head shots out of a group portait?
I just read the article, then the comments below, the many complaints and Richard's attempts at clarification. It is remarkable how people don't seem to understand the concept of using another camera's - ANY camera's - footage in an 'illustrative' manner, and how they then get stuck in a "but wait, this is unfair!!!!" - mode. The lesson learnt is that you have to know the weak spots of your readership and anticipate on it. In this instance go to extra length - say a paragraph or two - to explain the idea of 'illustrative' in language any 3 year old can understand.
The only reason I would upgrade my a6000 would be a joystick for selecting focus points. Or maybe a larger VF. For the rest, the specs of the a6300 don't excite me that much. I'm not that much into video, I don't do BIF's or sports, but it's easy to imagine that people who do may want this camera.
Operator: Would I pay 1,8k € for the lens? No, definitely not.Is it a bad lens? No, only premium-priced like all other Leica lenses as well.
The sample gallery shows another problem too: Most photographers have no need for such a long tele lens and therefore they don't know how to use it. The results would be pretty different at a airshow with sunny weather or on a safari.
Do I answer my own questions? Sure, why not.Do I think it makes me sound smart? Hell yeah.
fairfaxian: Anybody have enough Sony/Panasonic HANDS-ON experience to compare this to the Panny GH4? I was just about to pull the trigger on the GH4 as a 4K video cam w/SloMo (important features to me) As a Canon user, I have a collection of Canon glass -which I can adapt w metabones to either brand. Sony has a larger sensor, but the panny has an EVF, and a huge range of peripherals/accessories. Sony probably has better still IQ, and low light advantage. But I have never even held either cam in my hand (or any other sony for that matter) I love my Canon 7DII -but its a relative blunderbuss for size. And no 4K or SloMo video. Canon is typically slow to the feature wars, but I would tend to go with them if features were equal. Alas . . .
@Obelix, I just did find where to change settings and hereby humbly retract my comment. My a6000 just became even closer to perfect!
spontaneousservices: Would it be possible to shoot video with this _totally_ manual? I like my a6000 but when filming, its obligatory autofocus and auto WB irritate the hell out me.Using an old Nikon MF lens solves the focus problem but not the WB...
...found it. (Menu settings only visible in video mode.) Great!
Mine doesn't. Was that a firmware update?
As i said above, if this one is like the a6000 I would look elsewhere, you don't want WB to change during a take just because the camera won't let you put it on manual. The NEX5n is better in this regard!
Would it be possible to shoot video with this _totally_ manual? I like my a6000 but when filming, its obligatory autofocus and auto WB irritate the hell out me.Using an old Nikon MF lens solves the focus problem but not the WB...
dprived prev: to those amateur photographers (here or anywhere) who start bragging about the !!! superiority !!! of a mirrorless camera over an SLR first, but then quit doing so once they receive their proper answers from the pros or other knowledgeable and more experienced advanced amateurs; no offense, but:
Mirror, mirror on the wall,Who's the dumbest of all?Must be the girlie photog,Who can't handle a large cam?!Or maybe it is that obese m`am!?
Odds are, in a couple of years that comment will prove to have been short-sighted, if not narrowminded. But now already its sexism and fanboyism are quite apparent.
spontaneousservices: I'm a bit surprised, or disappointed, that the thing still needs a mirror to smash up and down when exposing the image sensor. A bit of a retro camera!Also, a fixed screen? Not quite my ultimate "swiss pocket knife"...
Only partly kidding! I would not be surprised if in a couple of years, the "R" in DSLR will be going the way of the typewriter, even in high-end cameras. Canon and Nikon will have their FF flagship cams in a smaller, lighter package with (of course, as always...) even better specs. Or, conversely, their flagship cams will have the same dimensions but with a larger image sensor, made possible by ditching the mirror. (Not for more but for bigger pixels.) If only because financially, nudging their high end customers to "upgrade" to a new lens line up wil be the smart thing to do once other upgrade routes have been exhausted or start to turn stale.
allright I get some answers a bit down this page...
I'm a bit surprised, or disappointed, that the thing still needs a mirror to smash up and down when exposing the image sensor. A bit of a retro camera!Also, a fixed screen? Not quite my ultimate "swiss pocket knife"...
wolfloid: I just hope that Leica brings out a Q with a 40/2 pancake lens. Pleeeeease!
make that 50mm!
of course it's too small to fit in a flip screen.
bottom of page 4: "[...] I'll just have to make due." - wouldn't you have to make _do_?
35mm 1.8 (50mm equivalent)
AKH: I have been following Dpreview for around 15 years now and I don't like how it has changed over time. It is like the reviewers have become sort of fan-boys in their reviews. Just a few years ago the reviews were much more objective and balanced in my opinion.
Also I'd say that I never had any focusing issues with my D810 with fast primes down to f/1.4 and the new f/1.8 series from Nikon. Didn't even have to fine tune any of my lenses which was not the case with my previous camera the D800.
Maybe cameras in general are just getting better and better?
Nice... I wish Sony would make something like this for the a6000