meanwhile

meanwhile

Lives in Australia Australia
Joined on Nov 14, 2009

Comments

Total: 264, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On FlashQ: The little cube for flash photography article (56 comments in total)
In reply to:

wansai: soooo are we supposed to strap the flash onto a stand with a rubber band after putting the receiver on?

There is an adaptor included in the kit with a tripod mount, or you can put it on a standard cold-shoe stand.

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2014 at 23:13 UTC
On FlashQ: The little cube for flash photography article (56 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jogger: errr.. cool concept, but, no to kickstarter. most of them fail and for the successful ones, the originators sell off to the highest bidder, keeping all the profits (e.g. Oculus) and leaving the backers with half-@$$ dev products.

let me know when there is a product that i can buy.

That's not been my experience with crowd-sourcing at all Jogger. 95% positive experiences here. Which is actually possibly higher than my positive experiences with established companies ...

Direct link | Posted on May 7, 2014 at 23:10 UTC
On Phottix Mitros Flash for Canon Review article (38 comments in total)
In reply to:

Denton Taylor: I don't get this. The 580EXii, to which this is compared, is a discontinued item. So you really have to compare it to the 600EX-RT. The 600EX-RT is currently selling for $550 USD, and has sold in the past for $500. So why would you even consider buying this thing with a radio control and all its failings for $400? If you insist on buying cheap sh*t, may as well buy the Yongnuo YN-E3-R controller for $130 and either buy Canon 600EX, or wait for the Yongnuo equivalents which should be out soon.

I don't get this. The article you are commenting on has just described in detail how this product is not "cheap sh*t". Did you read it?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 10:45 UTC
In reply to:

Alain Laboile: Thanks all for your comments, some of them are really... interesting.

Wonderful shots Alain. I enjoyed #13 especially.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 30, 2014 at 08:18 UTC
On Shooting Raw with the Nokia Lumia 1020 post (72 comments in total)
In reply to:

Houseqatz: being able to REALLY edit the images from a camera phone is a dream come true. it's not always practical to carry around a dslr, but i always have my phone on me. the 1020 is the best solution for my needs, mostly taking notes, and quick snaps, and when i want more, it delivers.

i have yet to use a camera phone that is as capable in the image department, or whose output affords as much editing latitude. i know that the 808 is supposed to outperform the 1020, but i have never seen one in the wild.

Read that first sentence again HowaboutRAW - "from" a camera phone, not "on" a camera phone.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2014 at 14:11 UTC
On CP+ 2014: Hands-on with Sigma DP2 Quattro article (249 comments in total)

9 pictures and not one of someone actually *gripping* the camera?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2014 at 08:45 UTC as 69th comment | 3 replies

What is the story with the double images? The first ones of the set look sharper and seem to have higher DR (or at least better color). What is the difference in processing/process between the two?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2014 at 10:52 UTC as 11th comment
In reply to:

meanwhile: For photos, this is only step one for the S120. It also shoots RAW. The quality difference of the RAW vs JPEG on the S series cameras can be significant (not always, but can be). Especially if you are looking to get details out of blown highlights or deep shadows, sharpen during demosaicing, or need to adjust white balance.

Any chance of adding the RAWs too?

If the Nokia RAWs aren't supported by your workflow (Lightroom, Aperture, etc) that makes it less versatile or useful though.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 14, 2013 at 13:14 UTC

For photos, this is only step one for the S120. It also shoots RAW. The quality difference of the RAW vs JPEG on the S series cameras can be significant (not always, but can be). Especially if you are looking to get details out of blown highlights or deep shadows, sharpen during demosaicing, or need to adjust white balance.

Any chance of adding the RAWs too?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 14, 2013 at 10:53 UTC as 39th comment | 3 replies
On Classic photographs recreated in Lego article (118 comments in total)
In reply to:

bigdaddave: A lovely bit of fun, but I hope this isn't being taken seriously as an 'artistic' project

Meh, art can be fun too.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 10, 2013 at 22:16 UTC
On Olympus Stylus 1 Preview preview (326 comments in total)

Are those samples almost all underexposed by the camera? (pre-production, so kinda forgivable)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 22:13 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply
On Olympus Stylus 1 Preview preview (326 comments in total)
In reply to:

Camp Freddy: A pretty ugly concoction, but somehow Olympus ( and Sony therefore as major share holder) are committed to a superzoom and retro PEN / OM styling.
|
Better off doing an mFT 16mpx chip with a non interchangeable 24-120 collapsing zoom for around the 700 USD mark IMHO. Let Fuji amd Panny fight it out with Nikon following soon after in the superzoom sector.

"When it was $500-NO. This camera is overpriced."

I have an XZ-1. Low light performance is worse, controls are worse, no EVF, almost 3 times less reach, and lens slower on the long end. How is this camera not worth the price of admission when compared to that?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 22:01 UTC
On Olympus Stylus 1 Preview preview (326 comments in total)
In reply to:

Camp Freddy: A pretty ugly concoction, but somehow Olympus ( and Sony therefore as major share holder) are committed to a superzoom and retro PEN / OM styling.
|
Better off doing an mFT 16mpx chip with a non interchangeable 24-120 collapsing zoom for around the 700 USD mark IMHO. Let Fuji amd Panny fight it out with Nikon following soon after in the superzoom sector.

"XZ-1 is now $245. Reasonable acquisition."

Sure, but if you only buy 3 year old cameras at that price, the company goes broke and doesn't make any more.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 29, 2013 at 21:58 UTC
In reply to:

IchiroCameraGuy: I looked at this Note 3 when picking new phone a few weeks back...didn't seem enough of a difference between this and LG Optimus G Pro for the Sammy to be 3x the price.

If camera quality is at the top of the list then Nokia's best seems the choice.

Hmm, isn't it 3 times as hot?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 27, 2013 at 14:30 UTC
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (588 comments in total)
In reply to:

RStyga: It cannot compete IQ-wise with the other DSLM manufacturers so is this what the marketing dept has come up with to save the day? Oh, well, some people will even call it "pioneering"...

Please show me the other rugged camera with this level of IQ at this price point.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2013 at 05:58 UTC
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (588 comments in total)
In reply to:

Avid70: ... and all I dreamed of was bracketing and CLS compability. By the way Nikonos you could actually dive with. This is for shallow bathtubs...

You have a 20m deep bathtub? How long does it take to fill?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2013 at 05:56 UTC
On Nikon 1 AW1 preview (588 comments in total)

Wonderful. Something small, decent quality photos, and rugged. Festivals, concerts, parties, hiking, camping, beach, kids, etc, etc, etc. This is a good development.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2013 at 05:56 UTC as 177th comment
In reply to:

Kim Letkeman: I would truly worry if a phone of any sort appealed to "photography enthusiasts" because -- although it can take an image -- it is not much of a photographic learning tool otherwise. On the other hand, I can see the appeal for "social networking enthusiasts" and press hounds ...

Composition and timing need work, thought, and practice, and are at least as important as any other elements of photography. I think you can learn a lot from images you take on a phone.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2013 at 00:50 UTC
In reply to:

M DeNero: A constant f/4 with longer range would be better for this type of camera. Now you have two choices for a walk-around lens: a pathetically sluggish f/3.5-6.3; or a chunky, truncated f/2.8.

24-80mm is a pretty decent range for a walkaround, no?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 15:12 UTC
In reply to:

cjhacker23: Sony always go 90 percent of the way to a great product and then stumble badly on that last 10 percent. Why, oh why, would you not allow for RAW recording or any manual control? This is an enthusiast device, for cripes sake! I had the thing on pre-order the moment it was available this morning and as soon as I read this, I cancelled it. And Sony's poor track record with firmware updates does not give me confidence that this oversight will be reconciled.

Ah well.

"For RAW they'd have to use the phone's processing power and storage system"

Not necessarily. They could shoot JPEG+RAW and store the RAWs on the card.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 4, 2013 at 16:37 UTC
Total: 264, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »