ShootFilmNotMegaPixels: So what would the result be for a f/1.0 lens after using this adapter?
You know when they have night vision goggles on in the movies and then someone shines a light in their eyes? Kind of like that.
meanwhile: The prices are ridiculous, but as a child of the 70's - 128GB of freakishly fast storage that big, this stuff is getting pretty amazing. I started on a VIC-20 ...
There's no magic button to get back the 6Ev of dynamic range you lost by going to ISO6400.
What reduces is the image quality - nothing to do with the lens.
You are right though, I don't even know what a RAW is. Never seen one, never adjusted one. Could you send me one of yours so I can learn about them?
"What "reduces" about the lens as the ISO increases? The optical quality doesn't really change"
Why are you repeating what I said?
"But most of those things can be added or changed during extraction--especially: "Colour accuracy, vibrance, saturation"."
Ha. There we go then. You must be magic.
"Not sure what "colour fidelity" means"
Rubbish, but eh. Colour accuracy, vibrance, saturation, depth, etc. Nothing to do with the lens being optically better when it reduces as the ISO increases. Perhaps you are viewing them at wrong size?
Photographyblog ISO6400 shows noise a tie, with color fidelity and detail going easily to the NX1. Shadows recover as well in both. Not sure what you are seeing.
"Hey, if you want to take over and have fun with him, be my guest. I'm bored with him"
There's nothing more to say.
"Generally the DPR studio scene isn't great for making solid guesses about higher ISO performance, and that's because there's little in the way of deep shadows"
If there is already noise in the midtones and the highlights, it's only going to be worse in the shadows. And there is already significant noise in the 5500 midtones - more than the NX1 at ISO6400.
Nah, once you look at it equally in the DPR Studio Comparison tool, the 5500 is behind the NX1 by a noticeable amount. RAW, ISO6400.
Papi, just stop. He lives for this.
The other thing I'd say is, when the speed of storage outpaces the need, that fosters innovation and improvement in the products that use it, rather than playing catchup to just make existing uses more effective.
The prices are ridiculous, but as a child of the 70's - 128GB of freakishly fast storage that big, this stuff is getting pretty amazing. I started on a VIC-20 ...
I only made one change to my 30mm to make it just right, for me. Duct tape around the focus ring.
How does this compare to an adapted Voigtländer 40mm f/2 Ultron?
Maybe "Earned" instead of "Owns".
Altruisto: Technically ok but no "vision" , no "personal touch". Though everything has been already photographed , there's "uniqueness" in the true artistic photos that convey the photograph universe. I'm sorry to say that there's no such a thing in these photos. They look like technical photos in "gear review websites". Oh, Goodness!With all the good amateur photographers revolving around Dpreview, why choosing this one, and why no series of photos instead of this constellation of different takes?
"number 9 have a problem with densities"
Can you outline that a bit more, if you have a minute? I find it to be a very satisfying, solid composition that is well grounded and forces the eye to where it should, taking it in and out of the photo to add movement and circulate to each of the elements in turn, each taking the eye to the next, and building to a complete feeling. What would make it even better?
mayurgogoi: i like no 9
The effect of the cloud reflection mimicking and adding swirling motion in the water is striking.
Stitzer23: If you like the pics and/or the article, you are free to comment on this forum. if you dont like the pics and/or the article, you are also free to comment on this forum. i am in the latter group and sick of people having the position that if it is featured on dpreview, we should all like it. and i dont have to be a chef to dislike a certain dish at a restaurant (and yes people do like me in parties).
Stitzer23 has not uploaded any photos to their gallery yet
Rooru S: For $6200 I could hire a good looking escort for several days, travel somewhere, have a good time with her and have her take the pictures (or take some 'selfies').
That price was very specific.
Gazeomon: One cannot even delete PHOTOS from the hard drive and free some disc space.Every time I import images into Lightroom, this crappy PHOTO has to be clicked out of my sight. Just another APPLE p-ss off.
Just use the Image Capture app in /Applications/Utilities.
You can change the default app to use in the application list in the bottom of the window.
You don't need to delete any apps or use external utilities to achieve this.
madeinlisboa: Correct me if I'm wrong. Lightroom still has a huge problem. There is no list of filters applied to images, which means that an user must navigate through radial, gradients, brushes, etc, in order to check which ones were applied to an image.
For those who don't see what his problem is: Imagine working without a list of Layers in Photoshop, and you just had the history of what you'd done to work from, and to select your layers from a point in the composition. It would be unworkable. Filters are essentially Lightroom's layers.