xpatUSA

xpatUSA

Lives in United States Bellville, TX, United States
Works as a Retired Consulting Engineer
Has a website at tcktek.blogspot.com
Joined on Dec 15, 2011
About me:

Mostly close-ups of watches for web publication.

Comments

Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7
On Exposure vs. Brightening article (14 comments in total)
In reply to:

walkaround: I don't know where this term "brightening" came from. It's GAIN, since this is signal amplification we are talking about. "Brightening" implies there is no downside, but there is: noise.
I would like camera buttons to say "Gain" instead of "ISO"... but current cameras and the people who use them (myself included) are still in a film mindset for many things. You probably won't change this any time soon.

Good article.

Re "The photons that fall on the sensor during exposure release electrons" is not quite correct although you might be keeping it simple for most folks. But only some of the incident photons release electrons (Google "Quantum efficiency").

Different software "brightens" images in different ways. Some change the slope (i.e. the gain) of the characteristic, some move the characteristic up and down and others actually change its shape. So, to me, "brightening" serves only as general term, as opposed to your definition of "exposure" which is spot on, IMHO.

Ted

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2013 at 15:20 UTC
On 5 Reasons why I haven't used my DSLR for months article (590 comments in total)
In reply to:

Virtually Grey: It's a Supermarine Spitfire, not a Seafire. Or is it known by another name outside of the UK where they were made?

You may not have noticed the Navy colors, the big arrestor hook at the back end, the words "Royal Navy" on the fuselage and the Navy serial number.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2013 at 20:59 UTC
On Photokina 2012 Roundup article (102 comments in total)
In reply to:

Shamael: On Samsung Galaxy.

"It's hard to imagine how the added convenience of full-time internet access will change the way you use a camera, but we suspect a lot of its success will depend on how the mobile contracts required end up being priced"

Ask the users of the new I-phone what it costs. All this nonsense is only made to suck your money, make Internet Provider earn more on your back. On the end, this, "you need to be connected", is a big scam only. Nobody needs nothing except to die. This is commercial brainwash, nothing more. They locate you by your cellphone and it continues by your laptop, your camera-phone, and now your camera, and so on.

Where will it end. We communicate all about us to just anyone on the globe and despite that we don't know who is our neighbor in the building we live or what happens in the bar around the corner. Brave new world we live in, isn't it.

Well said, Shamael!

All too often, innovation brings with it a further invasion your of privacy. Witness your Google account's home-page which was OK at first and then suddenly appeared their "chat" function which couldn't be removed - I wonder why? Eavesdropping??

Direct link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 14:16 UTC
On Adobe announces Photoshop Elements 11 news story (68 comments in total)
In reply to:

larrytusaz: I'd consider this as an update to my Photoshop CS (yes I have the ORIGINAL Photoshop CS), but Elements doesn't support 16-bit TIFFs, and when I shoot RAW, I convert to 16-bitt TIFF, do all of my edits there, and then once I'm 100% done I convert to JPEG, no sooner.

I know Elements can't include all of the Photoshop features, it's just too bad because 16-bit TIFF support is the only thing, for me anyway, that it's missing.

LRH

I don't understand what is meant by "support" here. In Elements 6, I can open 16-bit TIFF's and edit them in Adobe's 16-bit work space.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2012 at 14:51 UTC
On Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC HX20V Review news story (61 comments in total)
In reply to:

KoKo the Talking Ape: 10th paragraph: "PlayMemories Home is essentially a re-skinned version of Picture Motion Browser, which does it's job pretty well."

That should be "its", not "it's".

I knew a copy editor who would search the document she was working on for every instance of "its" and "it's" just to make sure they were used correctly.

I don't recall finding such errors in the material written by DPR staff.

Where I'm from, which is also where the language is from, we say "it's". I've been corrected here in the USA a few times on that one but, although I do try to write good American, there are times when the proper way is better ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2012 at 14:53 UTC
On Is Instagram 'debasing photography'? news story (291 comments in total)

Standing joke in our household is wishing for an "accent filter" in the TV so that harsh Noo Yoik, Awstriylian, Sout Efrikan, etc accents would be converted into a nice, soft Southern drawl before coming out of the speakers . . .

Direct link | Posted on Jul 20, 2012 at 14:17 UTC as 65th comment
On Researchers follow the noise to find composite images news story (38 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tom Goodman: Unless I am looking at pictures supplied by Joseph Stalin or Joe McCarthy, I could care less if photoshopping can be detected.

No, that's the American way of saying wot you just said and is perfectly understandable to those who live in the USA. But I do have to say that this fine example of being "divided by a common language" makes me cringe whenever I see or hear it ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2012 at 05:07 UTC
Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7