Imakefoto4U: Does the review get updated to include these features?
It would be great to schedule this. If any company has kept releasing updates and provided what seem like significant improvements, it deserves an updated review to look at what changed IMO. Besides, it would also be a great service to members if they can read about features and performance that they are actually going to get when buying a camera. Of course this depends on how much updating the camera maker has provided. This seems like a case when some updates to DPR's review would be greatly appreciated.
Sergey Borachev: About time there is some improvement in IQ for M43 after more than 3 years, but will these sensors provide that?
I see no point to upgrade until there is.
DPR is entitled to its opinion, but to go out of its way to publish a separate article with such a title and such a claim seems extraordinary, especially when there is apparently little experience with the product. Even the provided specs (which are what the claim was apparently based on) show very little reason for it to be called a great "convergence" pioneering product or "a big deal" at this time. For example, a 12 MP 1-inch sensor is nothing to trumpet about or to show how much stills capability this product has, and therefore not so convincing in its contribution to "convergence". I suspect this is actually going to do the opposite of what may be intended, i.e. raise so much expectationin the product and therefore so much frustrated readers when they found out it really is no big deal.
DPR should have someone like a newspaper editor to read what it is publishing. The content and the language do read like something poorly paraphrased from Canon material. Unprofessional.
Sergey Borachev: Er, sorry, I still fail to see what's the big deal.
Big deal to DPR because it's made by Canon. ;-)
Looking at the picture of the On-Off switch above, I am really disappointed with it. I thought it would turn 90 degrees from the On position to the Off position, like how it was in the old OM camera. This switch is turning like a lever AROUND the dial and only for about 30 degrees, which is why it can misleading. Good point, Dan. Most reviewers would just criticise the position of this switch (which is not a problem, but actually a cute touch for those who are familiar with OM cameras), and not this misleading design.
Canon's latest mirrorless finally looking decent enough in the essential features to consider buying as a basic camera, assuming its AF problems are fixed. It is however still catching up to the others and probably will be for a few more years, due to the lack lenses and also the fancier features like IBIS (necessary for old lenses), video, build and weather proofing, control dials and buttons, response and upgrade choices. It's probably a good thing to just sell to the Europeans and Asians first for the next two years, while it develops this to become a better solution for its DSLRs who wants a more compact and more digitised camera to switch to.
RedFox88: So its the smallest and also the slowest 18-50something zoom too!
Olympus 12-50mm f/3.5-6.3 is longer but thinner, and therefore roughly the same in terms of volume. It is however much wider in its FOV range.
Sergey Borachev: Very impressive, really nice features, except for one thing.
For a camera of this size, a built-in flash is much more useful than a hot shoe.
Bad mistake. I would rather use a tiny flash than an external flash on a pocketable camera.
white shadow: Good news for those who are new comers to the system. Bad news for existing owners as their second value has just dropped.
For me, I have moved on to Zeiss lenses in Canon mount. If you can work with manual focus, there is no comparison when it comes to image quality. Try them to find out especially if you are serious in photography.
Canon is probably about to release its own serious mirrorless cameras and it knows that EF is not the future.
Sell, Sell, Sell!
Another compact camera with nothing special. Just wait 9 months and it will be sold for $499 with 2 kit lenses.
Olympus is so dumb not to issue a compact with built-in EVF and built-in flash. This E-PL7 will go down fast, just like their last mistake, the E-P5.
A few people are saying this Nikon is justified for sports and action. I wonder how it compares with the Sony A77 II, which costs the same. ;-)
Thank you Nikon for these "1" cameras. Big sigh of relief for Olympus, Panasonic, Sony and Fuji each time Canikon release their sub par mirrorless cameras. These small makers are given more time to establish a stronger base and better chance of survival. Viva la competition, et aussi la diversité!
Ha, ha. While I am ready to believe that this lens is exceptional, I have some doubts however about DXO's findings. I will wait for more reviews before I will believe the speculation mentioned here that the Otus is actually better.
Sigma has proven many times that a high price tag and/or a luxury nametag does not necessarily mean the best, though obviously excellent.
Alexis D: People need to realize that this is a take anywhere travelzooom and so a small size is more important than a big sensor.
A 5-axis IBIS that works with 60p video is nice.
Next time, let's have a more advanced one, ie a fixed lens camera with 1 inch or M43 size sensor, EVF, and also this IBIS, 20MP, 12-45mm f/2 lens. It will be quite a bit bigger though, like a G1X or G16.
People need to realize that this is a take anywhere travelzooom and so a small size is more important than a big sensor.
Dylthedog: Come on then Olympus - now give us the same anti-shock update for the PEN cameras with the same issue - E-P5 & E-PL5.
Especially E-P5, if it is possible.
Sergey Borachev: So, Olympus, this is admission that there is a shutter shock problem with the E-M1?
Good to know that there is a solution for the E-M1. Could it not be used to fix the E-P5, which is by all account ruined by a more severe shutter shock problem. And, shouldn't it be used for the E-M5 and also all future OM-D cameras, if not all Olympus cameras?
Let us have the firmware updates for the other cameras, Olympus.
I think Olympus is changing. Lens hoods for the 12-40mm and then the 25mm f/1.8 lenses. Firmware updates that actually provide additional features in the E-M5 and E-M1. Bravo, Olympus. Keep it up.
Sometimes camera makers do not make sense, but as mentioned already, Olympus seems to have decided to do the right things now.
Really nice phone but there is a fatal flaw. FATAL!
So stubborn, using that failed 4 "uber" pixel camera again!
Companies that do not listen to consumers die. This is just like Nokia when it continued to stick with Symbian when nobody wanted that OS, and then with Windows to make sure the suicide worked.
The great Beats audio performance will not save it, just like the great camera on Nokia cameras did not save it. You can't have fatal flaws, no matter how great some other features are. HTC will probably never catch up to the top players again.
Who cares? It's still not an Android phone, and it definitely is not an iPhone. So?
Sergey Borachev: This is so funny, but also serious, when you see that Olympus, Fuji, Pentax and Sigma products exciting the readers here. The big makers, Nikon and Canon, show that you can make money by selling older technology products cheap to the masses and to those shackled to their lenses or rather their old mounts. This shows that not everybody can afford to switch or afford the latest and the best for their needs.
The Canon users in particular are an interesting bunch. They keep buying cameras with 5 year old sensors, that are inferior in DR to even smaller format cameras, and for Canon APS-C users, they keep buying those ordinary lenses!