PIX 2015
revio

revio

Lives in Sweden Sweden
Joined on May 11, 2004

Comments

Total: 73, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Fujifilm teases upcoming SLR-style X system camera article (919 comments in total)
In reply to:

marike6: Locking exposure dials a la the Nikon Df? Any amount of money that DPR loves this camera and the dials from day one. :-)

Part of what makes the X cameras at least interesting is the rangefinder design, the whole poor man's Leica thing.

What is the point copying a DSLR body styling? It's has no bright Pentaprism so why the pseudo pentaprism housing?

This is a head scratcher move from Fujifilm that is for sure. No FF, just an X camera dressed up as a DSLR. Has anybody asked why?

The main thing with the absence of a mirror isn´t the taking away of the "hump"!

It´s the quiite notable reduction of the depth of the camera body, which makes it easier to make it compact. A "hump" also will make it possible to make the body´s width a bit less, and its height except for the hump itself can be a bit less too.

Many have already stated much of this, but I found noone mentioned the depth reduction as a reason for the basic mirrorless design.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 21, 2014 at 13:19 UTC
On Reminder: Vote now for your product of 2013 article (64 comments in total)

@Lucas:

These 5 alternatives are there because they were selected before by the DPR readership to be the best in their respective category.

Of course the A7 twins are superb cameras, IQ wise especially, but obviously other characters of gear also took place in folk´s minds while making their choices. And, frankly, the m4/3 system as a whole is way more mature than the A7 w its dedicated lenses, so far, and will so continue to be a fair amount of time from now. From that we may assume that choosing the E-M1 as "best" wasn´t ONLY because the camera in itself is very good, but also because it can within its system be considered a better choice for a larger number of people than would the A7 in its present system context. Even the dedidacted lenses will, to a fair degree, offset at least a part of the benefit the camera´s small dimensions offer...

Just my thoughts, not supposed to be considered The Absolute Truth about this matter!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 18, 2014 at 13:18 UTC as 24th comment
On Hands-on with the Nikon D3300 and 35mm F1.8G lens article (139 comments in total)
In reply to:

revio: DPR says: "The D3300 continues to be one of the smallest and lightest digital SLRs on the market"

How can a NEW camera "continue to be one of the smallest..."???

Since it´s not been existing until now, it can´t of course...

The D3300 seems, anyway, to be a nice and capable camera, and notably smaller than its predecessor was.

EarthQuake:

Yes, the DXXXX LINE consists of a row of similarly sized cameras, but they did not state that. They said this new camera *continues to be one of the smallest*.

Well, only words...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2014 at 14:45 UTC
On Hands-on with the Nikon D3300 and 35mm F1.8G lens article (139 comments in total)

DPR says: "The D3300 continues to be one of the smallest and lightest digital SLRs on the market"

How can a NEW camera "continue to be one of the smallest..."???

Since it´s not been existing until now, it can´t of course...

The D3300 seems, anyway, to be a nice and capable camera, and notably smaller than its predecessor was.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 22:56 UTC as 11th comment | 4 replies
On DPReview on CreativeLIVE article (142 comments in total)

Barnaby B:
PLEASE articulate when you´re talking, and don´t talk aiming your face down to the table. It´s very hard to actually hear and "register" what you are saying. No other complaints! ;-)

(Im not having English as my native language, and i suppose many out there also are in my situation language wise. When listening to you it´s sometimes almost undecipherable, which is a bit sad...)

With kind regards, from Sweden
revio

Edited:
Well, I have to say it got better after a while, thanks! Also easier now to hear what Richard B is saying, thank you too!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2013 at 13:10 UTC as 24th comment | 1 reply
On DPReview Gear of the Year Part 3: Olympus OM-D E-M1 article (396 comments in total)
In reply to:

yabokkie: E-M1 may be the first Oly 110 format camera that's not just a toy, and
mZD12-40/2.8 should be able to compete with DX16-85 and EF-S15-85.

@yabokkie

The 12-40 is better (sharper) than both the Nikon 16-85 & the Canon 15-85. It´s also F:2,8 fixed, and weather sealed. Did I mention very compact vs its performance?

On cameras: I own the OM-D E-M5 and it´s definately not a "toy".
It´s not perfect for sure, but a TOY? No way, man.
It´s definately very competent, IQ wise, and also to some extent a bit complicated to use, so what. Does that make it a TOY? Haha, you are definately kidding.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 30, 2013 at 11:10 UTC
On DPReview Gear of the Year Part 3: Olympus OM-D E-M1 article (396 comments in total)
In reply to:

HubertChen: @ Andy Westlake

Great writing!

Thanks very much for the comment on the feature to Auto Focus on the eyes automatically. I shoot lots of portraits wide open, and wish my camera had this feature. You just added one more reason to very seriously consider to change to the M43 system :-)

@yabokkie

The Olympus way of implementing "Eye Focus" (and/or Face Detection if you like) is quite another, and better, than most any compact use. On the OMD´s you can decide WHICH EYE the camera shall focus on:
The left or the right, or simply the closest eye if for example the subject is not facing you right on. That´s not really the same thing as the "Face Detection" feature most compacts do have. It´s quite useful, and a nice example of Oly innovation!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 30, 2013 at 10:44 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2792 comments in total)
In reply to:

revio: Why, oh why, isn´t there ANY size comparison in this preview?
There use to be in most every DPR Review, and often in the pre-reviews, so why not here?
Many, I am sure, would like to se it placed beside a FM/FM/FE/FE2/FA, which are the cameras which´s design most resemble the design of the new camera. OK, all those are smaller, but that´s the point of getting a view of the case: HOW MUCH larger is the new camera.
It´s not enough to know "it´s close to a D610" or so.
I for my part want to see a photo of the difference, so I can judge for myself how it differs, or how it comes close (if it does)

Regards
revio

(I must add, I like the design a lot)

I found a photo with the DF beside a Nikon FA, on the Swedish site "fotosidan.se", link here:

http://www.fotosidan.se/cldoc/vara-forsta-intryck-av-nikon-df.htm

For anyone who´d like to watch! ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 23:14 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2792 comments in total)
In reply to:

revio: Why, oh why, isn´t there ANY size comparison in this preview?
There use to be in most every DPR Review, and often in the pre-reviews, so why not here?
Many, I am sure, would like to se it placed beside a FM/FM/FE/FE2/FA, which are the cameras which´s design most resemble the design of the new camera. OK, all those are smaller, but that´s the point of getting a view of the case: HOW MUCH larger is the new camera.
It´s not enough to know "it´s close to a D610" or so.
I for my part want to see a photo of the difference, so I can judge for myself how it differs, or how it comes close (if it does)

Regards
revio

(I must add, I like the design a lot)

Thanks Richard Butler for replying, and for the info! ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 22:55 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2792 comments in total)

Why, oh why, isn´t there ANY size comparison in this preview?
There use to be in most every DPR Review, and often in the pre-reviews, so why not here?
Many, I am sure, would like to se it placed beside a FM/FM/FE/FE2/FA, which are the cameras which´s design most resemble the design of the new camera. OK, all those are smaller, but that´s the point of getting a view of the case: HOW MUCH larger is the new camera.
It´s not enough to know "it´s close to a D610" or so.
I for my part want to see a photo of the difference, so I can judge for myself how it differs, or how it comes close (if it does)

Regards
revio

(I must add, I like the design a lot)

Direct link | Posted on Nov 6, 2013 at 20:27 UTC as 301st comment | 4 replies
On Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Review preview (341 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zvonko: I just don't understand why any brand would sell a lens which needs tweaks for focus from the moment you buy it.
Looks like a FAB lens but as others have said, the focus issues suck.

The way PD-AF as technology works is such that the precision needed to make a lens that always focuses perfectly well at max aperture like at F:1,8 is next to impossible to reach in mass pruduction like most lenses are the results of, so to speak.
Even if not mass produced it would still be next to impossible, simply because of the way such AF-systems are desiggned to work.
That´s why the need for "after manufacture adjustment" have come into existence, and why it is the chosen way of manufacturers to make their products more usable.

The constantly risen resolution (higher pixel count) of modern cameras made this necessary; had all cameras stopped at fex 6 megapixels these things (micro adjustment of AF) would not have came about.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2013 at 09:34 UTC
On Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Review preview (341 comments in total)
In reply to:

David Naylor: Wow, this "AF issue" is being blown completely out of proportion. I've had this lens for over a month now and haven't had even the slightest indication that there is anything wrong with the AF. If there is any inconsistency I'd say it is well within the limits of what is normal for any lens using phase-detect focus.

And since the open-loop AF myth has been de-bunked (i.e. PDAF *does* confirm focus after shifting) then a large part (all?) of any inconsistency will be the fault of the AF sensor.

@Andy Westelake:

What about trying a sample for another mount, like for Nikon?
I have owned a Sigma EX 18-50/2,8 for Canon, exhibiting quite "outspoken" AF-issues. Friends have owned Nikon and Sigma w no trouble at all. Actually, I have seldom heard of such issues with Sigma in Nikon or other non-Canon mounts. Surely there have been such issues, but I have a distinct gut feeling that Canon is the mount Sigma have had most trouble with, historically and possibly even today.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2013 at 09:21 UTC
On Did Sigma design the Olympus M.Zuiko 75mm F1.8? article (200 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kodachrome200: to bad they didnt manufacture and sell it under there own brand. could have saved us all 500 bux

"their" own brand you must have meant...and I´d say that it´s worth a few bucks to have it Zuiko/Oly branded anyway ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2013 at 16:19 UTC
On Did Sigma design the Olympus M.Zuiko 75mm F1.8? article (200 comments in total)
In reply to:

Frank_BR: Something is very strange in this history.

The Zuiko 75mm F1.8 lens was announced in Feb 8, 2012. However, according to the Egami blog the Sigma patent's filing date is Feb 3, 2012, that is, only five days before the announcement.

On the other hand, after a lens design starts, it takes months, if not years, until the production (and announcement) effectively happens. So, it is not reasonable to think that Sigma started the design process of that lens long before filing the patent application.

"it IS reasonable..." should have been better wording in your last sentence corresponding to the rest of your rant (!)(?)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2013 at 15:59 UTC

"Large maximum aperture" hahaha, they (Fuji´s press release content writers) are surely a bit funny here...albeit this aperture is, say, 1/3 of a stop better than some other lenses in the same category.
But to deem an improvement of 1/3 of a stop, "large" ? I don´t think so ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 09:45 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

fmian: Does anyone know what kind of deposit is required? I would imagine it's at the full price of the camera in case the 'borrower' does not come back.
Why cannot one just find a retailer with a good return policy instead?
Paxtons in Sydney offers a 45 day return policy. No questions asked.
Surely 45 days is better than 48 hours?
Also, not sure about the UK, but in Australia it's within a consumers rights to return a product they are not satisfied with. I believe the allowed time is 1-2 weeks.
At least, that is the rules we abided by when I was working for HN.

I think psychologically it´s much easier to loan something, even if you know very well its price if you like to follow up bying it, than buying it first then return it if not satisfied. It feels better to "just" loan it if you are not 99% sure you´ll like it, than do the outlay of money and then have to get back and try some explanation to "why you´d not keep it".

This psochological reason, I believe, is valid even though there surely are many "no questions asked" return policies around...even then, some will feel awkward coming back and having to "ask" for his/her money back.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2013 at 23:17 UTC
In reply to:

FreedomLover: Interesting to see for some it's too big for others too small.

Looks like we have reached a point where it's obvious
manufacturers should offer different grip sizes,
or include them in the package or make it adjustable.

A modular camera will be nice too: exchangeable
bodies, sensors, stabilisers, processors, lens mounts, lenses,
displays, viewfinders, batteries, flashes and cards,
connectors, wireless, bluetooth and GPS modules, software.
Just like desktop computers today, but portable now.

Would make it easy to switch to infrared for a night, for example.
Or for optimising price, quality, size, weight and look
to our evolving possibilities, needs and tastes.
Also good for repairs and the environment.

And exactly what has those remarks to do with Panasonic´s lending program of a certain camera, the DMC-GH3???

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2013 at 23:01 UTC
On Olympus USA announces XZ-10 enthusiast compact article (45 comments in total)

"Just three weeks after the European launch"

So, why is 3 weeks later considered "just 3 weeks" when I´d say it´s more like "a whole 3 weeks later than in Europe"???

Couldn´t help myself ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2013 at 22:43 UTC as 3rd comment
In reply to:

ryansholl: Everyone seems to be stuck on the difference between 4/3 depth of field calculations (+2 stops equivalence) and 4/3 light throughput calculations (x1 equivalence).

Why does this have to be such a big deal? Same light throughput and same shutter speeds at equivalent focal lengths, much deeper depth of field. That's good sometimes. It's bad other times.

Lately it seems like everyone on the internet is deriving their own behavior from American politics. Total inability to admit anything other than "I have been completely right from the start"

Grow up.

@ZStep84:

Everybody knows that already! Those in the search for lenses for m4/3 are supposedly those who OWNs such a camera, and they KNOW the differences betw "FF" and m4/3 (of course exactly everybody doesn´t know but most do)

Thus, no need for FF apologists around here. And you may know: Manyy people use BOTH "FF" and APS-C/m4/3...happily and for the subjects/events they consider respective camera to work best.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 2, 2013 at 10:54 UTC
In reply to:

al_in_philly: What I don't understand is why Olympus is releasing new lenses without weather sealing them? What use is producing a weather sealed flagship M4/3, the OM-D E-M5, if they don't also produce lenses which are sealed as well? I could maybe see it if the lenses were just a couple of hundred dollars (maybe), but not on a piece of glass on the other side of $500. Oh, one more thing: what's up with Oly being so niaggardly with lens shades? Don't their Product Development and Marketing departments talk to each other?

There is no flagship m4/3 Olympus camera, yet. The E-M5 is the current top model, yes, but the flagship is yet to arrive. Olympus has officially said there will be coming both lower and higher models in the "OM-D" series, so to speak. (for my part, all Oly M4/3 cameras is part of one series, their names nonwithstanding)
When the higher speced, than the E-M5, model comes, I´d think at least a couple more weather sealed lenses will also be launched. At the time, or soon after.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 31, 2013 at 17:56 UTC
Total: 73, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »