PIX 2015
aris14

aris14

Lives in Greece Athens, Greece
Joined on Jan 3, 2005

Comments

Total: 346, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Hands-on with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 article (495 comments in total)

Great new lil' devil...
10 days old manicure not great...

Direct link | Posted on May 20, 2015 at 00:00 UTC as 37th comment
On Hands-on with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 article (495 comments in total)
In reply to:

Allen Yang: I used to like Panasonic, but the skintone of indoor portraits and high ISO noise were hideous! I took a picture of my aunt in a restaurant and showed her the pic. What a horrible mistake, she almost killed me! Her face looked sort of purple in that picture. By the way, the camera I used back then was a Panasonic LX3.

Two options available are...
Change aunt...
Learn shooting pics with a compact cam. Easier than making pics using Dslr's...
Yoda that is...

Direct link | Posted on May 19, 2015 at 23:56 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 offers 4K video article (128 comments in total)

Mean and lean by all means..!

Direct link | Posted on May 19, 2015 at 23:44 UTC as 8th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 offers 4K video article (128 comments in total)
In reply to:

tabloid: Sensor is half the size of full frame....hmmm

Simple elementary school geometry...

Direct link | Posted on May 19, 2015 at 23:35 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 offers 4K video article (128 comments in total)
In reply to:

mediasorcerer: So what video looks better, 4k from a mft sensor, or 1080p from a ff sensor, just wondering anyone?

Ιs this camera taking good photos?

Direct link | Posted on May 19, 2015 at 23:33 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T10 cuts X-T1 features down to size article (42 comments in total)
In reply to:

QuarryCat: even smaller and lighter - and the X-T1 isn't really big and heavy - I don't think it is the right way for serious picture taking.
To small for my hands.

Not my style, to retro and to ugly.
I like the X-T1 a lot more - it is more Contax, more good propositions.

I don't see a big market for this camera.

Yep! Marketing needs just to gain again from gained reputation out of XT 1.

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2015 at 09:23 UTC
On Canon EOS 5DS R real world sample gallery posted article (482 comments in total)
In reply to:

sneakyracer: Worked with the RAW files using LR and right away I could tell that the file quality of the 5DSR is excellent. Best I have seen from Canon to date. No question about it. The files, even the high iso ones, are extremely workable in LR. They retain great quality (noise and color) even when making pretty wild adjustments. They are similar to 5D3 in look and feel but better. I can't get into specifics until I use the camera with my own lenses and lights but initial impressions are great.

To my eyes Nikon's color rendition is more suitable to my likings, back from the days of Reuters Nikon/Kodak hybrid of 6Mp. Proper PP of course can deliver the desired results from both manufacturers, but not in all cases. FF and APS of Olys, Pentax and Panas are usually rendering more pleasantly (sometimes quite idiosyncratic in PP) while Leica's rendition seems too "firm" and absolute and Minolta/Sony's are expressing their hidden unexpressed love with greens.
As said it's a matter of taste and serious PP.

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2015 at 08:26 UTC
On 017A0571_ACR-CONVERSION_ISO100 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

I' ve tried and used intensively some of the Canon's monsters the last dozen years from D1s I to Fivies. I always had an issue with the way they render whites. Maybe it's my idea, sensors' s quality definitely allow whites restoring as you like (that's more than obvious given pixels number and headroom), but I always have this feeling.
It's similar to my confidence that in low lights conditions these monsters behave better than anticipated.

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2015 at 07:59 UTC as 1st comment
On photo in sample gallery (1 comment in total)

I' ve tried and used intensively some of the Canon's monsters the last dozen years from D1s I to Fivies. I always had an issue with the way they render whites. Maybe it's my idea, sensors' s quality definitely allow whites restoring as you like (that's more than obvious given pixels number and headroom), but I always have this feeling.
It's similar to my confidence that in low lights conditions these monsters behave better than anticipated.

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2015 at 07:59 UTC as 1st comment
On Lily Camera flies itself and follows its owner article (155 comments in total)

Forget selfy pics. Here comes the selfy vids!

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2015 at 08:14 UTC as 29th comment
On Lily Camera flies itself and follows its owner article (155 comments in total)
In reply to:

Paul JM: There is nothing novel about this at all
I married one about 19 years ago

Awesome battery performance!

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2015 at 08:13 UTC

Superb lenses in the line of quality of Oly..!

Direct link | Posted on May 13, 2015 at 07:38 UTC as 5th comment

Maturity is expensive... A good glass!

Direct link | Posted on May 13, 2015 at 07:32 UTC as 19th comment
On Oly-EM5_II_7-14-F2.8_ISO200_p5110008 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Very good in terms of distortion, very very good!

Direct link | Posted on May 13, 2015 at 07:25 UTC as 1st comment
On photo in sample gallery (1 comment in total)

Very good in terms of distortion, very very good!

Direct link | Posted on May 13, 2015 at 07:25 UTC as 1st comment

No matter how good or insufficient this device may be, it will be proved, as tenths of other "smart" solutions made to ease our life from cooking to car care, just a trend which will last some months, for trendy people (irrelevant if they are I-something users or not).
C' mon, we all know it and maybe some of us that we know it have bought in the past such silly, glittering, most promising gizmos, for really unknown(?) reasons...

Direct link | Posted on May 8, 2015 at 08:49 UTC as 4th comment

Misery!

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2015 at 06:50 UTC as 22nd comment
On Big Zoom: Nikon Coolpix P900 real-world samples article (154 comments in total)
In reply to:

brn: Warning: not for pixel peepers.

At 1:1, even this ISO100 images look terrible.

I agree with the IQ, but give me a decent image out of this cam and I' ll return a PPed image that will bring a lot of its viewers in doubt for its origin.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2015 at 06:48 UTC
On Big Zoom: Nikon Coolpix P900 real-world samples article (154 comments in total)
In reply to:

chillgreg: Only 1 2000mm sample??? Of a mountain with no fine detail? That's the headline feature! What's up with that @Dan?

Dan, spare us the excuse and shoot... lol

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2015 at 06:44 UTC
On Big Zoom: Nikon Coolpix P900 real-world samples article (154 comments in total)

Big big zoom bridge cameras are quite a tool, no matter the comments of pixel peepers.
These guys would never tell the difference of an image of a celebrity in the beach or sport scene printed in their favorite tabloid or sports mag.
It's sure that those cams images would never make it to National Geographic pages, but they can capture an image of importance at the glance whereas the pro monsters systems would need an eternity to do it.
Some of those cams offer very good IQ comparable to monsters in some cases.
The P900 seems to offer a decent quality comparing to the results of previous implementations of a couple years old from other manufacturers. Definitely not a top in IQ, but the +30x zoom factor has its cost.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2015 at 06:41 UTC as 38th comment
Total: 346, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »