Artistico: Personally, I can't see the point of a combined warm-up and polariser in a digital workflow, but I am sure those who can are the target market anyway. And lots of people still like their neutral grads and other filters that digital post processing have rendered partly obsolete as well. The effect of polarisers undoubtedly has a big place today, of course, since for many shooting situations there is no way you can replicate its effect in post processing. The warm-up effect of an 81A filter, however? I can't see how the difference between something shot with a regular and a warming filter would be anything but negligibly subtle and only visible in a direct side-by-side comparison of prints, the perceived colour of which would be affected a lot more by the light used for their display than by a warm-up filter used during shooting.
I'm continuing to be confused on why people equate using a warming filter with "getting it right in the camera".. when you can just get the white balance (with a warming effect) also right "in the camera", without a filter?
jdh99: Just adjust the white balance in post processing. I don't see the need for this except maybe for film shooters
One way or another, if you want to go the purist route and get the image 100% as intended IN CAMERA, then you have to set the white balance IN CAMERA before taking the shot. Why futz with setting the white balance before adding the warming filter, when you could just set a warming white balance with no warming filter needed?
So.. if I have this correct and understand how this guy uses old school.. He would have to set the WB before mounting the filter, and then he'd be assured that the filter would warm his images? IN this case, why not just shoot a warming WB card (ie. slightly cooler/bluer than neutral gray)?
ManuelVilardeMacedo: I voted "full frame or nothing", though I don't really appreciate the implication of fanaticism that sentence contains. Having used 4/3 for years and dipped a toe or two in APS-C, and having a substancial experience with the real full frame (135 film), I believe full frame is the only way for digital to go. It's better at everything compared to smaller formats. As demand increases, chances are we'll see truly affordable full frame systems very soon. Of course one could go over the top and vote for medium format, but are our computers up to handling such large files? Full frame is actually more sensible than it appears to 1", 4/3 and APS-C users - as long as one doesn't go bananas and buys 36 MP cameras.Some months ago I had the chance to sort a Nikon Df. I fell in love even before holding it. It's such a capable camera! I wish people would look at it without prejudice.
"1. It is obvious that most people don't share your view. It is absolutely not a surprise that the overwhelming majority see the 1"-APS-C as a desirable sensor size range."
You misread the poll instructions. The idea was to capture what people felt was the bare minimum, not what they felt was most desirable.
I get how the purchase price varies based on age of the item, but are the rental fees similarly different?
PicOne: what's different with this versus renting a lens and never returning? I assumed Lens Rentals would charge your card for the item in these instances anyway and would have always been an option?
I suppose it's a change. But agree, quite natural. I guess it might mean having more inventory.. though companies such as Adorama rentals would presumably not have an issue as they'd pull from store inventory. And as pointed out in the press release, excluded from this rent/buy option are any hard-to-get items.
Wasn't trying to imply that it would be an inconsiderate act.. I'm saying that I'm really surprised I guess that this policy/practice wasn't instituted from the get-go of the company as a default option for customers. It's just common sense IMO.
Lots of folks seem to be saying that this is a "brilliant" business plan.. I'm kinda scratching my head and thinking "well.. duh"
what's different with this versus renting a lens and never returning? I assumed Lens Rentals would charge your card for the item in these instances anyway and would have always been an option?
Bhima78: Seems like an amazing oversight by Panasonic to not have a touchscreen in this camera. Its like they packed so much in, that the touch guy at Panasonic just forgot about it.
LOL.. us left eye dominant users could use our noses to release the shutter.
nunatak: the author has an angry tone to his writing.
perhaps DPreview should ask him to do the camera maker executive interviews?
perhaps some of the phraseology used just might create such a tone.. eg:
ignore and be ignoredstepping on the toesinevitablyjealous ofrestrained congratulations over the fencedisruptive influencebutch high-end compactsdried up and diedcravingGodfathersquabbling low-endferociously digesteddecimationjunk-end compact marketrelic of a battlecouldn't care less
Luckily I found out the wireless general purpose printer I bought a couple years ago is google cloud ready.. That said, I find the instructions absurd should I want to use Photoshop on my photography, and then try and send a print to my Epson 3880.. it looks somewhat of kludge process to get a chromebook to print to an offline printer.
DPR must be scrambling.. They seem to have missed the fact that this was an announcement of new Teleconverters, with an also-mention of the WR filters. If they did see the TC mention, kinda odd they made no mention of them?
mpgxsvcd: For $800 I will just buy Ten 128 GB off brand cards. I would rather not keep all of my data on one very expensive card.
PNY is "off brand" ? I think my first camera memory card was PNY (purchased in 1999 I think and had 256mb storage). It still works, fwiw..
Photo Pete: No gloss optimiser. Vast tonal range and gloss differential too!
Not interested until Epson make a pigment printer with 3 black shades, matt black which doesn't need ink to be purged before use and which has a gloss optimiser. Oh, and which only purges the cartridge which was replaced when one runs out rather than all of them.
Perhaps even with an Epson own brand continuous ink system.
There are a lot of things Epson could have improved in a new printer.,, black density was very low on my list.
who says this is a pigment printer?
PicOne: Some things I'm not understanding:1. How to access the battery?2. How is this different than a eg. RRS plate that has built-in area to thread in your own quick release strap?3. How did this work for the DPR reviewer "when shooting in the vertical format" -- is there an L-Plate edition of this?4. I don't see any demonstration of how a camera actually hangs on your body using this.. the photo with woman up top has her having to hold the camera while wearing the camera.. that doesn't seem very ideal.
So, the benefit of this, over just connecting a QR strap to the camera's lugs, is basically it's more comfortable to hold vertically if you have some other square/hard-edged uncomfortable QR plate attached to your camera?and, you can spin the camera.
Downsides are:1. doesn't work with cameras that don't have battery grip attached. Can't access battery.2. doesn't allow L-Plate tripod usage
I just never recall having any issue walking around with a 1dII with whatever lens attached with a normal QR strap attached to the camera's lugs. I know I'm missing something here, but can't tell what it is.
Some things I'm not understanding:1. How to access the battery?2. How is this different than a eg. RRS plate that has built-in area to thread in your own quick release strap?3. How did this work for the DPR reviewer "when shooting in the vertical format" -- is there an L-Plate edition of this?4. I don't see any demonstration of how a camera actually hangs on your body using this.. the photo with woman up top has her having to hold the camera while wearing the camera.. that doesn't seem very ideal.
PicOne: that 24-70 f/4 now very competitive against Panny's equivalent 24-70 f/5.6 lens going for only about $2 less.
Good point! It's even more impressive realizing that equivalence was only being referred to from a FOV standpoint. Of course, Canon's lens is really a 24-70mm lens (not 12-35mm), and the $999 price is even more astounding.
that 24-70 f/4 now very competitive against Panny's equivalent 24-70 f/5.6 lens going for only about $2 less.
How would say, the image quality of this paired with a Leica top-o-the-line prime lens, compare to that out of say a Sigma DP merrill (or Quattro) of similar FL?
photoshack: I preordered today based on the timing of things: I was looking for a "backup" camera to my 5dMkIII and was not having much luck with a used 5D and didn't really want to mess with the rebel series. I don't care about sensor size...I can take a good photograph with 6 mp. I have had a X100S (loved it but returned it because fixed lens was not flexible enough) which had the EVF that worked great. My hope is this little camera's EVF is also as good.
The fuji film simulation was really nice, and got me thinking in "chrome" colors again. Anyway, my X100S experience led me to this camera...we'll see how it goes.
in your circumstance I probably would have recommended an EOS M.. well under $400 and get the EF lens adapter.
In this age, with so many apps that do color (and B&W) film emulations (eg. Alienskin's Exposure), and do it better and with a lot more control, not sure why it's such a selling point built into camera OS.