ulfie

"What's old is new again."

The E-PL1 is waaayyy good enough for 95% of amateurs.  Sure it doesn't have 1 zillionith of a second top shutter speed, sure it doesn't focus blazingly fast, sure it's LCD is not the best of the...

Guy's response is yet another example of how the older generation is promoting drugs and alcohol, leading the younguns to moral decrepitude and decay.

This thread will become moot if/when Oly puts the EVF-4 and one eight-thousands' shutter into the OM-D body.  Just wait... Well, if not moot, at least cow moo.

As a teacher of 35+ years (ESL, English as a Second Language), I've found one can "learn" things intellectually, sometimes quickly even.  Not always though.  But to successfully "apply" them to...

The 17 and 45 will meet most of your needs given the lenses you have and use.  Both are light and small.  Keep it simple and you'll enjoy the trip more.

Better than a picture of one's hotshoe.

What's the little "pancake" lens on the body in the rear?

Leica-designed, Panasonic-produced lens I believe.  Excellent nonetheless.

Eduardo et al.,  Isn't the LX3 a fine little camera?

Nice composition contrasting the greenery of Nature (foreground) with the metallic lines of the buildings (background).  Though I find the hues a bit washed out.  That mutes the Nature feeling a...

Compare the X100S with the lowly, humble and aging Olympus EPL-1 at ISO 100 on DP Review's interactive studio shot comparison widget. Zoom in on various parts of this test scene area. The Oly...

I got seasick reading all these replies about pitch, yaw, roll, etc.  Dang near lost my lunch...   ;-)

Not "rich guy's toy" but "rich guy's toy blunderbuss," with all the phallic undertones included. ;)

US $900 is cheap? The need for f/1.4 is waaaay over-hyped. An f/2 with IBIS will do just as well for probably 1/3 the cost.

Well done!  I remember those hot chestnuts and other assorted street-vendor goodies from my days in Peace Corps in S. Korea (1976~78).  Thanks for sharing.

WHOA! 94mm (3.7 in.) long and nearly US $900. Rich guy's toy blunderbuss.

At ISO 800 and below, especially with good lenses, the E-PL1 will always be much better than "OK."   Newer sensors are undoubtably better at 1600 and above, but not everyone shoots there, at least...

"Macro" technically means greater than life-size, i.e. greater than 1:1 magnification.  In the past I believe only Nikon was the company that used the more accurate "Micro" when labeling such...