SaltLakeGuy: Sorry guys if I offended you regarding your endless desire to mix and match. To me it's a bit like a "low rider", they butcher up a car to modify it beyond it's original design for their own amusement. Hey, it's a free country, knock yourselves out as it's your $$$ that supports their mechanical experimentation's.
Why is it so hard for you to accept that people don't want to rebuy their L lenses to fit on a more advanced body? Your arrogance is breathtaking.
Marksphoto: im not a big fan of the color off the sony sensor, it looks like the quality is high but just the hues turn me off
@ suave . What on earth do you mean? have you ever tried correcting a horrible reddish skin tone from a Sony camera or cyan sky from a Canon camera? Not all cameras are equal. Compare a great natural skin tone from a fujifilm camera to a sony body.
alextardif: Meh... all this adapted nonsense is just that for now... nonsense.
Whats nonsensical about using your existing collection of professional EF mount glass on the latest Sony bodies...?
Aasmund G: It's getting to the point where the best Canon mount body is a Sony, and the best sensibly priced lenses for Sony are Canons
It's already there.
I would like to vote for "game changer" as the most over-used phrase of the internet era.
Jason, you sure picked a great time to be on the East coast and Sydney, the usually hard Aussie sun is softened just enough in winter and Sydney is going off with The Vivid festival of light.
Gesture: Wonderful photographer but really sad that this genre is about shooting a mini-movie and picking the best frame. Instead of anticipating, hitting the mark, being willing to accept what time and incident give us.
@ gesture. Its all well and good to make statement like that sitting at your keyboard. Its another thing entirely being out in the field shooting a brief that you will have to present to your bosses. It really doesn't matter how you get the shot, all that matters is that you deliver what your paid to deliver, and get called back on the next one.
Biowizard: There was a time when a camera simply measured the actual light coming in through the entirely passive lens, adjusted for the reported aperture setting (trasmitted via a mechanical lever), and made the perfect exposure on a fixed-ISO sensor (called film).
Frankly, the idea that a LENS needs firmware is appalling. So many lines of computer code trying to compensate for manufacturing shortcuts which, once upon a time, were sorted by decent design, gear reductions and the pitch of helical-cut metal.
@butterflySkies lots of advantages where the lens registers to the body and many lens corrections are done by the camera body, like vignetting, chromatic aberrations and distortions etc. Lots of these can be done in post-software but as the lenses talk to the body and give the specific settings its all done in-body without you noticing. It also gives the advantage of smaller and cheaper glass as corrections are software based and not done with extra lens elements. And yes, rotary and non-cordless telephones don't require a power outlet to function, they just need to be plugged into a phone outlet in your house.
@butterflySkies not ironic, the advantages of electronic technology outweigh the occasional incompatibilities which arise. Theres always an alternative tho. Will you ditch your mobile phone and go back to using a rotary phone because it doesn't need power to make a phone call?
Its not at all appalling. Your complaint is like saying modern cars are appalling as they are not purely mechanical like the old days. Being electronic, lenses and cameras now work symbiotically, and the results are far and away superior to lenses and bodies of yesteryear.
Clint Dunn: Well I logged in but what do ya know...more of the same. Lots of narcissistic bikini clad babes flogging the latest nutritional supplement and twentysomething adventure tourist selfies taken from Mesa Arch providing such pearls of wisdom as:
'When you focus on results nothing changes, when you focus on changing you find results'.
It really just shows you similar feeds to what you have looked at or liked, so if your getting those types of images, you only have your own browsing habits to blame...
peterdix: what is lens peaking?? I've canon 500d with 55-250 zoom I very often take pics manualy focused and the red "in focus" diode lights up when it is in focus
Peaking refers to the function of edge highlighting what is in focus when using an Electronic Viewfinder. Or it is also a setting when you can engage extreme sharpening in an electronic viewfinder so that whatever is in focus pops very obviously. Not applicable to Optical viewfinders. Google "focus peaking" for more info :-)
steelhead3: The subscription service has made Adobe irrelevant.
gskolenda: They are way over priced! They need some stiff competition.
HPRC are a very good alternative.
mailman88: A camera for the Rich and Shameless
@dash2k8 I don't think for a second that FF DSLR's are less than stellar, my point was that for some types of work, MF is critical.
papa natas: There are snapshooters,prosumers,short order photo-cooks,And then, there are THOSE, who PLAN and CREATE an image.Those using tripod, light meter, bellows, and bring a thermos with coffee.For THOSE, Lee Filters are still the benchmark on photo filters since many years past. Lee Filters are STILL most popular among movie directors.Ask David Lean (Dr. Zhivago)Maybe one day this new generation will rediscover COKIN Filters.
Halleluja! You nailed it!
stevevelvia50: A lot of my friends have used filters with great results. I have only used polarizes and NDs. I generally expose for the brighter horizon area in a shot like this using my D7200. Occasionally I will bracket couple of exposures, always on my tripod. I simply use two adjustment layers with a layer mask and brush. I will vary the opacity of the brush and carefully paint in the desired exposure until it looks natural. Works perfectly and you can continually adjust to taste. For the past 15 years I have been doing all of my basic darkroom work in Photoshop with no more than two differently exposed images made on a tripod. Remember, subtlety is the key.
But there is nothing more satisfying then getting a great image straight out of the camera, that maybe just needs little tweaking.
Why is it so hard for amateur's to grasp the concept that these cameras are tools of the trade? The return on investment for some career photographers is such that a top of the line camera like this just what they need to get the job done. How is this different to say a truck driver buying a $100,000 truck so he can do his job? And no, a FF DSLR is not 'good enough'..
Frank in Bridgewater: I guess people must buy a camera like this for the same reason that they buy a Rolex watch. Because they can?
" I can't afford it and have no use for it , therefore neither does enyone else"
David McLean: I've been using a Nex-5T with a forty year old Zuiko 50mm f/1.8 'brass & glass' manual lens (+ inexpensive Fotga converter). The Nex-5T's on-board focus highlighting works beautifully and includes a LiveView focus zoom. The lens cost me $30 and is delivering some of the best portrait shots I've ever taken. The Zuiko 50mm f/1.4 works a treat too and has slightly better bokeh. I'd recommend trying one of these old lenses on the A6300 for pinpoint focus control.
new sensors+old glass=stunning results