I've often wondered why Leica haven't gone for a digital rangefinder, given that the mechanical one often needs recalibrating - according to many users. I don't have one.The proof will be in the execution, so let's wait and see. If it is a good idea yet still goes belly up, maybe they could licence their technology to Leica.
Technical details were included but haven't shown: 56x stack with Nikon D800E @ f11, 1:1 magnification
It's the size of an aircraft carrier with no built-in EVF?
Infrared, it hasn't got any sort of battery door, plastic or otherwise. The bottom of the battery sits flush with the camera body.
Are these new Nikon 1 cameras restricted to MicroSD? Under specifications, the storage type is given as;
So can it use SD cards or is it moronically only able to use MicroSD? If so, then why, given they are swanking about using WiFi to connect with phones and pads?
So if Nikon intend to introduce this, why no built-in EVF on the V3?
joeyv: Nikon sells it's low end dslrs to "soccer moms." Statistics show that, in the US, this market segment actually prefers dslrs to mirrorless.The V3 is for professionals and enthusiasts who already own Nikon dslrs. It's a perfect compliment to dslrs,as: 1.) it takes existing lenses via Ft1 adaptor 2.) It adds capability to dslr users because of its speed and reach.Nice as the other mirrorless cameras are (A7, OM-D), it doesn't add anything except smaller size, to current dslr owners. In fact, they all fall short in one way or another. The Nikon 1 series will always be the speed king and will have the longest reach. In the near future, as sensors evolve, IQ will improve to a point where the diff. bet. 1" & micro 4/3 sensors will not be so meaningful anymore. Just like dx and ff now are both very capable low light tools.In effect, Nikon has produced a mirrorless camera that doesn't compete w/ its DSLR line while still attracting a specialized group of photographers.
I have a D800E nicely complemented by a V2. But I won't get a V3 despite its amazing specs because:
1. I got 5 extra batteries for the V2, since the charger works so slowly. The V3 has a different battery2. I have a fistful of SD cards unusable on the V3.
So Nikon put a big needless barrier in front of V2 owners. Brilliant.
Marty CL: As a long time Nikon owner with many Legacy F mount auto focus lenses, I use and love my current D7100. With that said, I also own a Nikon V2 which I have great regard for. I'm not so sure that the V3 is a step forward in the sense of only allowing for an optional, add on electronic viewfinder---why such a device is no longer an integral part of the camera, I don't know that I understand the rationale. And I am indeed old school, but I've never been particularly fond of the tilting LCD screens.
Some have expressed the opinion that Nikon will never develop these mirrorless cameras to a great extent for fear that they will pose a threat to the DSLR market. I've always thought of the Nikon 1 series as a sort of testing ground for ideas that will eventually be found in their DSLR series. Whether or not mirror boxes are eventually replaced by either an advanced pellical mirror or by a pure electronic view find, only time will tell. But I don't think the Nikon 1 is a waste of effort.
I also have a V2 which I really like, a complement to my D800E. I doubt I will move to a V3 as it takes a different battery, so what do I do with the handful of extra V2 batteries I have? And what do I do with the many 32GB (or more) SD cards I routinely use? The decision to go MicroSD is moronic and is a complete deal-breaker.I am not getting a bunch of new batteries and MicroSD cards on top of an expensive camera plus EVF.
Are Nikon serious? "High" burst rate is 4.2fps for ... EIGHT frames? Goodbye sport photographers STILL waiting for a D400.
Now that new Sony a6000 with 11fps looks very tempting; no word yet on how big its buffer is though.
forpetessake: This FF lens is far superior to the APS-C version. It's APS-C equivalent is 18-200mm f/2.3-4.2, which is quite usable, unlike the slow f/3.5-6.3. Or if you are using APS-C mirrorless put it on a focal reducer and get the same benefits. The APS-C version is just boring and slow.And as an observation, despite all those ignorant posts that crop sensor somehow means smaller lenses, because of smaller image circle, this is just another demonstration that image circle has little or no effect on the lens size.
Revenant, you are partly right. There will be a 1.5x multiplier for APS-C camera for ejective focal length. The 28-300 will act like as 42-450mm. But the apertures remain unchanged. At 300m the FF camera has a physical aperture size of 47.6mm, which remains unchanged simply by swapping to a camera with a smaller sensor.F stop is ACTUAL aperture size over ACTUAL focal length.
I will consider this, given I'm fed up waiting for a Nikon D400. And the lack of a mirror is a bonus if the EVF is good enough. I await reports with interest.
An astonishingly underwhelming effort, a menopausal streetwalker saying "Come home with me dearie?" Sony has Leica at its mercy: RX1 with built-in EVF and interchangeable lenses will leave the Germans floating face-down in the water. Fuji is also capable of putting them out of their misery.
I have a 3800, which has 80ml cartridges. These last a good long time. When one is empty, the printer simply stops partway through printing and carries on when the cartridge is replaced. No effect on the quality of the photo. This is great and in contrast to my earlier Canon which just carried on with a colour missing.I am very happy with my Epson.
Superb effort. In response to Jojakim's guts-ache, I would have on my wall in a flash. Very well done.