Kangaroo Court: Why does this video reek of Infomercial? Im sure none of it is a lie, this camera is perfectly capable of this shoot, but what I see is a photographer with skill being in very nice places with nice things to shoot. This could have been done with any Fuji or MFT or Samsung (or DSLR for that matter). Im just not seeing why using the A6k in particular was the "key" to these results.
Any help here? Did he just draw a name out of a hat and happened to choose Sony? Also, did I hear him say apsc is a good choice bc it gives a little more DOF??
Probably because Samsung has neither. I didn't want to disappoint you more than I already did. Wink wink.
Yeah, with a camera no one in here has handled (as said, not even released) and with which fast focusing 70-200 f4 lens again?
jaxson: There is actually very little between DSLR's and mirrorless cameras, especially when you switch to live view mode on a DSLR.
Mirrorless tends to be packing way more smarts into their devices, and on sensor auto focussing, across the whole frame, is surely where we're headed. I can't see a reason why this couldn't be added to a DSLR for the best of both worlds, for those who want to remain in DSLR land.
Clearly any notions of 'it's lighter and smaller' is irrelevant when you go and slap a big lens on the front of it, and they often don't have particularly comfortable grips either. The tech (wifi, flipscreens, touchscreens, upload to facebook/email etc) and the predictive tracking focussing is surely where the main benefits lie.
Videos like this are great to say that mirrorless is a viable option, and over time surely the tech and EVF's will only get better. We're in quite a cool time for this sort of gadget :-)
I was referring to your point of implementing all that on DSLR's, which do not have EVF's.
Yes, yes, let's compare with bodies costing almost/more than twice as much or one that isn't even released yet.
MaxISO at his finest again.
Fast on sensor AF is less of a benefit when you're stuck to using it with the back LCD. Much harder to track, much less comfortable for action.
It's the fact that these small cameras can also be small and lightweight with smaller lenses, where there are still benefits and will remain benefits. They won't be the smallest, nor the best action camera with fast and large action lenses, but they strike a good (and relatively affordable) balance on most/all grounds for many. Compared to buying several cameras to cover each one of those grounds.
Danny: This photograph is about the fundament of humanity. No matter who you are, what you are, what your religion or sexual orientation is. It is repulsive to reject a person just because of that. This photograph could have been taken anywhere in the world, places that are much worse than ours, but it could also be taken just around the corner from where you live. Homophobia does not have any borders, and reading some of the comments below, it is clear and present, right here, right now.
@ JD Catabas:The context here is humans, not displays or other objects . And in the context of humans, it always means fear/anxiety.
Trk: What I see from sample images is vulgar rendering, noise reduction algorithm and bokeh. But I understand dpreview represents Amazon and they want to sell a lot of these units with a nice margin and make a nice profit - by providing biased information to potential customers.
The only bias I sense here, is Trk's, packed in a personal attack against Dpreview. Supported by the fact that more people than just Dpreview have come to conclusions similar to theirs, while shooting with cameras from other brands themselves.
Simon97: I'll have to eat my words. I said 16mp was the golden spot for APS-C because Sony's 24mp sensor is quite a bit more noisy than the 16mp that came before it, indicating the progressive improvements were coming to a halt. Now this new sensor has more resolution and better noise performance, so there is clearly room for APS-C to advance. I forgot about that thing called BSI.
Was already an outdated statement since the A6000 24 mp sensor is less noisy than the 16 mp sensor too, dedpite OSPDAF.
HowaboutRAW: The Lollipop OS supports raw, right?
@ Menneisyys:" Definitely not. Not even much larger sensors have that much."
That's assuming you're just looking at the highlights. But there should be DR treasures should be in the shadows too. Large sensor cameras have the benefit of low shadow noise, but phone cameras tend to employ quite crude NR in shadows, which kills more shadow information than needed. From what I've seen, the Nexus 5 has quite a bit more information in RAW shadows available, than what the OOC jpegs present us with.
quezra: I'm still surprised the A7ii beat the D750. It is far more of an incremental upgrade to its predecessor (A7) than D750 is (to D700).
And this condensed all-in-one vote doesn't make much sense since all these products are good, yet each suited to completely different tasks or types of photographer.
All true, but I just replied to the statement that the A7II was the first to have a stabilized FF sensor in general.
And the A900 and A850.
Interesting how "van der Galiën" as a last name over time has turned in to "Vander Galien".
Marty4650: It looks like Sony is getting serious about FE.
Smart move, on their part. I hope Canon and Nikon are paying attention.
"Why is that funny? "It's funny because the most heard complaint about Pentax at the very moment, is lack of new lenses and bodies. I guess LED lights in a funky looking grip weren't considered much of an upgrade...
And that's what this was about, not how many lenses there were or weren't. Altough I agree, that is probably a more relevant discussion....
"Sony is not caring about APS-C anymore and it shows".
Reality check, the A6000 outsells any other mirrorless camera at the moment. It also outsells every Sony system camera in the current line up.
If you think Sony doesn't care about their best selling system camera, you're the one living in a dream world. They put lens development resources where the holes are the most glaring (FE), as expected. And for the umptieth time, a 70-200 was lacking for APS-C too, same goes for a 135 and longer macro. They wouldn't be much different if just designed for APS-C, hence why A6000 owners are enjoying their 70-200 lenses too.
FUD won't turn that in to "ditching".
AmirhosainD90: So where is long awaited promised "Sony prime FE 85 Zeiss F1.4"?
Maybe Bluevellet photoshopped it so he could point out how Sony failed on their "promise" now. ;-)
TN Args: @Smartypants...... humunnnnnnnngous!
I would still like to see a Sony statement on who they think is going to buy the A7 system and who they think will be buying the A77/99 system. With their separate lens systems.
The A77II is overhauled on practically all levels (CMOS sensor, AF sensors, processor, controls, buffer depth, seals and build, connections, LCD, range limiter, on sensor PDAF, Wifi, etc.). Don't be fooled by the name, as it's arguably more of an update than most other cameras replacing their predecessors.
The myth of completeness. Complete depends on your needs. Most people stick to no more than 3 lenses (in fact, recent surveys suggest even less). And with >20 lenses, there's still plenty of people to please, as also suggested by sales.Most of those "mediocre" lenses outresolve most µ4/3 lenses. See DXOmark. And to suggest Pentax while claiming Sony has stopped APS-C development (refuted by Sony already), is hilarious.
More FUD, as expected.
Rooru S: Even if I love E-mount cameras...All I got to say about these new lenses (Except the 28 and the Macro is...) WTH with these HUGE LENSES.
Hope no.1: The macro doesn't extend while focusing and the lens has mechanical coupling instead of focus by wire just like the 28-105 F4 G OSS.
Hope no.2: The 28mm f/2 is the best bang for the buck and also has mechanical coupling. I would buy the lens and the converters inmediately to replace the SEL16F28 + VCLECU1 and VCLECF1.
Hope no.3: They quit making huge lenses with large aperture and focus on a best balance in size after these lenses. It wasn't necessary to make a 35mm f1.4, just a f2 like the one found on the RX1 series would be fine.
Meanwhile in A-mount, Sony should bring a 1DX/D4S competitor and D810 competitor. The a7R isn't good enough and I'm quite sure a a99 succesor should try to compete against it while bringing another model to compete against the D750 and leave the a7Mk.II against the D610.
I agree that relatively affordable primes are welcome and from what I've heard, the 28mm f/2 is the first to fulfill some of those wishes (<$500).
Paul Auclair: sweet. improved IBIS.the only (and just slightly) eyebrow raiser for me was the 7II's IBIS performance being somewhat less than Oly's mirror-less offerings.
Nonsense, the sensor fits and has room to move, as displayed with the A7II and the fact that there's more room than the Leica FF mount. The corners you are referring to, are not part of the active pixel array. Before there were FF E mount cameras (just after release of the first NEX cameras), Sony stated that FF wasn't planned yet, but that it would fit because they took the option into consideration during the design process. As for amplitude, it moves as much or more than the sensor in the A mount FF cameras, which has a lot more room to spare. We've gone through all the assumptions (FF doesn't fit, oh it fits, but can't move, oh it moves but not enough/ as much as the other FF IBIS system) and time and time they fell flat on their faces in practise.
There's already the Zeiss 35mm f/2 and if you want really compact, there's the 35mm f/2.8. So what was missing and asked for? The f/1.4.