TrojMacReady

Nice shots Ralf. I especially like the light in the last one. Revived good memories of my trip there, almost two and a half decades ago.

A simple piece of tape and 15 minutes of work, gives macro mode AF too.

A lot of the costs are due to restructuring as well. Operational income without the sale of buildings, is still aove $1 billion, but it's true that there is still massive bleeding in the...

So we went from worse than the A300, to even worse in real life than the studio comparison that I posted, to about the same picture quality as the A57. That's at least 3 different claims within the...

Did you actually see the RAW comparison at ISO 3200 between the A57 and A77 that I posted above? Very close and the A57 even received a third of a stop more light. Staring at differently sized...

It's quite a bit cleaner than the A300. Don't make the mistake of comparing differently sized output. That's like saying camera X is noisier than camera Y because camera X is noisier at A2 print...

I would have also liked to see it tested on the A99. Going by their test setup picture, the stationary mirror and electronic front curtain could actually help, if the different microlenses (edge...

And I'm not saying you did, see my earlier post. You implied it's a substantial factor and it's not, especially in this context (a mere 25% jump from 16 to 20 MP). There is no weird logic and the...

"The A58 should be a step down from the A57.  The pixels are smaller on the A58, gathering less light.  Thus, it would take a significant sensor technology upgrade, for the A58 just to match the...

And also a much less efficient sensor (all per unit area), more read noise and more electronic noise in general, as seen in the shadows. Even looking at RAW files. Comparing noise performance is...

There is little to no correlation between megapixels and noise for a given output size in practise. According to the SNR measurements, they are within 0.06 EV, well within the margin of measuring...

Even after removal of the three screws, the front won't come off unless you screw it off as it has its own screw thread too, if I remember correctly (I took mine completely apart to clean all parts...

AFAIK they haven't tested any prime longer than 300mm other than the Sony.

You can run the links through google translator but the diagrams tell the tale and show you the models and percentages. They showed normalized (to the same output size) crops from all cameras in...

Mine is sharp as a prime at all focal lengths and even wide open. Another strength is the bokeh, which is very smooth.  Last but not least it's built to last forever. But that comes at a price too,...

But it's not about how much light one pixel gathers, but rather how much the sensor gathers. In other words, how many photons can be used to form an image of a given size. If one pixel gathers 3...

See this comparison, to give some context to what the writer says in the first place. ;) It's a "blind" comparison between the top camera phones in all kinds of lighting conditions.

more light to the sensor no need for a separate AF module less back- or frontfocusing no need for the mirror extra space inside the camera that can be used for all kinds of things (filters,...

You throw in your subjective and irrelevant interpretation of support when I was pretty specific in what I said was supported. Wrong. They still need to communicate with the newer bodies to have...

First, that very much depends on your shooting style, second, the  Canon number does not even reflect visual patterns such as banding, which in practise lower the usable DR even further. Here's...