TrojMacReady

And that's what people have been asking for quite some time now. To see your bad NEX 6 shots that you claim to have.

The obviousness that you have nothing to show for your stories saying you shot many sequences, or even the story that you own the camera. Don't hide behind others when you claim you have the...

I said I see sharp shots, you said you saw properly focused shots too. Are you calling Dpreview's claims of 70% the marketing efforts? They have a feedback button. Where are the test shots you...

notext

You can't read. I see sharp shots (which is still more than competing mirrorless cameras can do, no one claimed it was going to be DSLR performance) but I explained why it's irrelevant to compare...

Again, that is false. Of course it can be labeled a con because technology that has been on the market and technology that is currently on the market, proves there are alternatives, even when...

Again, that is false. Of course it can be labeled a con because technology that has been on the market and technology that is currently on the market, proves there are alternatives, even when...

Again, that is false. Of course it can be labeled a con because technology that has been on the market and technology that is currently on the market, proves there are alternatives, even when...

What was lousy, your posting skills? You've never posted any. Your question is rather irrelevant, since Dpreview based their findings on 10 sequences, not 8 shots.

Movie mode has much lower requirements to get continuous AF, since you're looking at an output that is 8 times lower in terms of theoretical detail, even a larger difference in practise due to the...

They said 70% out of 10 sequences. They only posted 8 shots, do the math. Hint, the answer is not 7. Still waiting to see your NEX 6 shots. Of anything.

The way Sony has implemented its buffer, RAW and Jpeg buffer depth is usually the same or almost the same in SLT's.

Turn the autoreview off and see if that's what you're looking for.

" it's hardly used, particularly handheld, because DSLRs are too large to hold out of front of your face like a P&S. And switching from PDAF to less robust contrast detect AF makes little sense...

" it's hardly used, particularly handheld, because DSLRs are too large to hold out of front of your face like a P&S. And switching from PDAF to less robust contrast detect AF makes little sense...

"LV is mostly thing to manual focus, hardly way to really shoot photos with dSLR, unless absolutely needed."

That's a chicken/egg case. It's hardly used because most implementations are severely...

"LV is mostly thing to manual focus, hardly way to really shoot photos with dSLR, unless absolutely needed."

That's a chicken/egg case. It's hardly used because most implementations are severely...

"LV is mostly thing to manual focus, hardly way to really shoot photos with dSLR, unless absolutely needed."

That's a chicken/egg case. It's hardly used because most implementations are severely...

Yes, this is based on user tests, not official message from Sony. As said, likely due to sharing lens ID's with lenses that are calibrated and/or registered in the latest firmware update. There are...

Don;t fully agree. My aging A500 is very fast in LV (just as fast as when using the OVF) and still qualifies as a DSLR. The same goes for the whole A3xx and A5xx series.