PIX 2015
khaw

khaw

Lives in United States NM, United States
Joined on Oct 4, 2007

Comments

Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4
On Under the hood: A closer look at the Sony a7R II article (593 comments in total)
In reply to:

Glen Barrington: Now comes the great guessing game! What OTHER companies will get to use this technology?

I'm willing to go first, though I make no guarantees as to accuracy! Would Nikon or Pentax get this tech? I don't think so.

My reasoning is that Sony seems oddly serious about the camera business this time around. Quite unlike some other product lines they have dabbled in over the years.

Nikon and Pentax seem to occupy the same 'ecological niche' that Sony desires to thrive in. It would seem crazy to help put them on the same level Sony has achieved.

I think it will be Olympus that gets the tech, Sony has pretty much abandoned their crop camera line and m43s has proven surprisingly resilient.

It would make sense to see Olympus as no threat to Sony since they occupy a different ecological niche. Sony could profit off of any Olympus sales while spending no R&D for developing crop camera lines.

Thanks. I hope you are correct with regards to Olympus as I use Sony and Olympus gear most. They nicely complement each other.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 19, 2015 at 15:29 UTC
On First Impressions: Metabones Speed Booster article (354 comments in total)

I am very happy with the Leica R version of the Speed Booster and am looking forward to the Nikon version. As I am used to manual focus lenses poor AF is a non-issue for me.

Vignetting is more severe for my very long Telyts. However for short tele and normal lenses the slight corner degradation of image quality doesn't really bother me for real world pictures. Of course one can easily see the degradation when pixel peeking.

It would be interesting to have as part of this review a look at wide angle lenses, such as 14 to 28 mm. I only have Nikon WA lenses and have to wait for the fitting Speed Booster version.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 1, 2013 at 03:47 UTC as 101st comment
On The Lightroom catalog article (304 comments in total)

I prefer to process some images in ACR of CS6, Nikon's Capture NX 2 or Capture One. How would LR4 fit into this scenario as an organizing principle?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 29, 2012 at 06:14 UTC as 65th comment | 2 replies
On CES 2012: Lytro Photowalk article (140 comments in total)
In reply to:

BradJudy: I haven't seen it mentioned much, but this technology can also be used to generate an image with essentially infinite depth of field, rather than choosing a particular focus point and using a conventional depth of field. That's how it's used in industry (and why it was developed in the first place) to create very large depth of field without super small apertures (and thus long exposures).

That's right. My understanding is one needs the full version of the software on a personal computer for this.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 13, 2012 at 20:43 UTC
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4