-
You're right, that's an important feature we should have mentioned, thanks for bringing it to my attention. Added. (Breathe.)
-
You have been disrespectful, actually. Re-read your own posts. I did respond in those threads on the day the review was posted, look again. But I've been busy here lately trying to respectfully...
-
Heie2, sounds about right. For you, the score is critical. I get that. It must go up, never down. I get that too, and disagree with the notion, even as i understand your point. But you won't...
-
Fo more on our scoring system, read this rather comprehensive document: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/4416254604/camera-scores-ratings-explained
-
For more on our scoring system, read this rather comprehensive document: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/4416254604/camera-scores-ratings-explained
-
The review is quite objective and quite positive. If you can't see that a new camera with few changes should be re-evaluated when it is reviewed again several years later, I can't convince you....
-
To be clear, the review doesn't say that. He's responding to something ThePhilips said further down, a paraphrase of something someone else said.
-
Okay. You're obviously inconsolable. Every review has cons. Try not to take them personally. I really liked the Pentax K-5 II and K-5 IIS and strongly recommend them to fans of cameras and...
-
-
Heie2: And how about this gem from the first paragraph of the conclusion: "Though they don't represent hugely significant upgrades to the original K-5, the Pentax K-5 II and K-5 IIS still hold...
-
Heie2, had you read the review, you'd see statements like these: "Much as other manufacturers generally update internal components of their professional SLRs while leaving the controls untouched,...
-
So Gold isn't good enough for you.
-
So Gold isn't good enough for you. "Could it be a testament to being ahead of its time in the first place, and then having the smarts to keep what works?" Its high score is reflective of that...
-
See Page 7, "Low light image quality and AF." When I did the extreme low light AF test my light source was reflected fluorescent light, which I did not mention in the review.
-
Now it's my comments on the card door that are causing a problem and drawing conspiracy theories. You really are sensitive. It happened. More than once. Maybe it's how I hold the camera. Ever...
-
You're over-thinking it. It was a busy Fall filled with new cameras and many conflicting priorities. We've done the best we can. It's not a conspiracy. Both cameras got gold awards because we think...
-
Yep, miscue on my part. Card door is the correct answer.
-
Sorry to not meet your expectations, Mark. I take my gallery shots to demonstrate the camera's features, primarily its sensor, and I post them uncropped and unmodified. As such, I frame elements...
-
The K-5 II has this one: http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/photos/2580397/imgp2076?inalbum=pentax-k5-ii When I went out specifically for night images I took only the K-5 IIS, so...
-
Our job is to review cameras, not promote them. We gave them both Gold awards, though, which is our highest award.
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
| Total messages |
11 |
| Threads started |
1 |
| Last post |
2 days ago |
| Total articles |
1 |
| Avg. helpfulness |
0.0 |
| Last article |
2 months ago |
|