rrr_hhh

rrr_hhh

Joined on Dec 29, 2002
About me:

I'm an amateur photographer, mainly interested our daily environment, architecture and steetphotography.

Comments

Total: 180, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Bill T.: I wonder how many of the anti-CC ranters here are merely annoyed because they can no longer pirate the software?

I've never mind paying for good value received, and as far as I'm concerned CC represents fabulous value for the money, especially for those who use multiple applications.

If Adobe went back to old scheme, I couldn't afford to pay for a lot of Adobe programs (and their updates) that I now use. Just think...that would give us a whole new thing to rant about!

Same as MusicmanUK !
My first version was PS 2.5 and I got every version except CS4, up to CS6 included.
Those who have invested thousands are more pi$$ed off by this lack of choice than the would be pirates, who can hack it anyway.

Direct link | Posted on May 16, 2014 at 22:09 UTC
In reply to:

leno: I thought great just the thing for my mum but it needs wifi. Is anybody who does not use socal media going to have wifi at home?

Right,
The critical point is WIFI..
I have already thought about offering an olding tablet to my mother, exactly to that effect, but stumbled on the need of a WIFI connection, a modem and a monthly internet service provider subscription, which isn't that cheap here, especially for retired persons.
NB : a tablet is already a photo frame...

BTW, I would have liked to learn more about the receiving side than about the sender side.

After all what would perhaps make it a selling product is the receiver side, not the sender side.. We already know that we can easily share our pictures over the net.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 10:45 UTC
On Eyefi announces photo sharing cloud service article (15 comments in total)
In reply to:

philosomatographer: I already have this experience (photos on any of my devices are instantly shared to my other devices, and my PC) using BitTorrentSync.

Why would I want to send my images to a for-profit corporation's servers on another continent when BitTorrentSync lets you create your 'own' cloud - securely - involving only your own machines / devices?

They are all trying to sell us something we neither need nor want : I prefer to keep my things (data, documents, pictures, everything) on my own computers and on my home server. It is enough to get all of them synched when I'm home.

And I hate my IOS devices since they managed to force you on their server, playing havoc with my mailboxes and contacts and storing my docs where I don't want them to go.
A simple card reader and a non proprietary file managers and we would be better set. Instead they are trying to coerce you on their own server.
All the same, whether Apple, Microsoft, Adobe, Google. I avoided storing things on Facebook, but now they all want my most personal data : noway !

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2014 at 11:06 UTC
On Eyefi announces photo sharing cloud service article (15 comments in total)

Not sure what is new here ?

You could already upload to a smartphone or tablet and from there go to their servers ? Unless you don't need a smartphone anymore ?

Anyway : that was not a good purchase for me : it is way to slow and tricky to use. I don't use it anymore.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2014 at 10:59 UTC as 8th comment
On Adobe Camera Raw 8.4 and Lightroom 5.4 now available article (70 comments in total)
In reply to:

rrr_hhh: OK..

I have finally managed to find a direct link to download the last LR5.4 version

here is it (window version) :
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/thankyou.jsp?ftpID=5741&fileID=5773

You have to log in to see the link probably.

The problem wasn't with Bridge, nor with CS6, which were updated smoothly, it was with LR5.3 which always pretended that I had the last version.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 12:42 UTC
On Adobe Camera Raw 8.4 and Lightroom 5.4 now available article (70 comments in total)

OK..

I have finally managed to find a direct link to download the last LR5.4 version

here is it (window version) :
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/thankyou.jsp?ftpID=5741&fileID=5773

You have to log in to see the link probably.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2014 at 10:49 UTC as 9th comment | 4 replies
On Adobe Camera Raw 8.4 and Lightroom 5.4 now available article (70 comments in total)

So I thought I'would look in the Adobe Forums to get some more insight and perhaps a solution to my updating problem with LR ...

They are out of service, undergoing maintainance.. What a bad company Adobe has become.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2014 at 10:26 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
On Adobe Camera Raw 8.4 and Lightroom 5.4 now available article (70 comments in total)
In reply to:

paul simon king: Hmm MY LR5.3 says there's nothing to upadte as it's up to date

*scratches bonce*...

Ooops...

I have made a new comment for that. Same here, update available for PS CS6, but still nothing available to update from LR5.3 to LR5.4

At least, I'm not the only one. So hopefully they will correct this soon.

It is 12:21 PM Europe Central Time. (aka an hour later than in the UK)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2014 at 10:21 UTC
On Adobe Camera Raw 8.4 and Lightroom 5.4 now available article (70 comments in total)

Hi all,

I have a problem with this update. I own both PS CS6 and LR5.3 and have the right license for both applications (but I'm not in the creative cloud).

I first tried to update LR yesterday. But when I checked from inside the application, it said my app was uptodate.

Then I launched PS and there found the Camera Raw which I could update.

I waited till this morning to check for LR, but still no update available. And the new lens profiles while available from PS, aren't available from inside LR.

Has anyone got the same problem ?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2014 at 10:19 UTC as 11th comment | 4 replies
On Meet the UK's first female press photographer article (22 comments in total)

Where are her pictures of the suffragettes ? and of the life in London ? only military men.. that is deceiving and a very phallocratic choice to present the work of the first pressphotographer woman, especially since you say she has photographed the suffragettes.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 14:57 UTC as 5th comment
On Revamped camera and lens feature search now live! article (31 comments in total)
In reply to:

rrr_hhh: 1) I have clicked on four cameras to compare them, the "compare" word is now yellow, but where should I click to get to the side by side comparison ? Hovering the mouse over it a box appear showing the cameras were added to my short list, but I can't find any way to get to the comparison ! Clicking in the menu on the compare item includes all the cameras, not the ones I have already chosen.

2) it would be nice if there was a click box under each of the main category, where I could include both the RF and SLR style under mirror less, or both the large size and mid size SLR for instance.. Having to choose between a particular category or include all categories is a little annoying.

PS : I'm using an iPad Air with Safari.

I found it now after you answered to the guy who couldn't compare lenses : that bar lies at the very bottom of the page, after about two miles of black empty space due to all the adds and stuff appearing in the right frame.
I would prefer if there was a compare button in the frame allowing the filtering.

For the rest it is a nice rewamping.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2014 at 14:51 UTC
On Revamped camera and lens feature search now live! article (31 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael J Davis: Nice work!

But...went to compare lenses - clicked on them, couldn't see what to do next so went to 'compare side-by-side' & it gave me a list of ALL lenses. How do I get the compare selection to work?

It is the same for the cameras ! You can select them, they will be added to your short list (so they say), but I don't see anyway to compare them side by side.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2014 at 14:40 UTC
On Revamped camera and lens feature search now live! article (31 comments in total)

1) I have clicked on four cameras to compare them, the "compare" word is now yellow, but where should I click to get to the side by side comparison ? Hovering the mouse over it a box appear showing the cameras were added to my short list, but I can't find any way to get to the comparison ! Clicking in the menu on the compare item includes all the cameras, not the ones I have already chosen.

2) it would be nice if there was a click box under each of the main category, where I could include both the RF and SLR style under mirror less, or both the large size and mid size SLR for instance.. Having to choose between a particular category or include all categories is a little annoying.

PS : I'm using an iPad Air with Safari.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2014 at 10:06 UTC as 19th comment | 2 replies

"We don't see the smartphone as an enemy. We like to see it as representing an infrastructure which we should be making use of. (...) we'll be able to create a system which is of benefit to our customers."

What about tablets ? I will believe them when they update the remote apps and allow me to check focus on the tablet/mobile at a much higher resolution. The live view display on the 6D is a real pain to judge focus, I had great hope in using the remote app instead, alas the resolution is so low that it makes things useless, aka not really better than the camera display.

So Canon, if you are really serious, please improve the available apps for remote shooting.

As is, I can judge focus better on my E-M5 display or on its E-VF than either on the live view display of the 6D or its remote app, not even the optical VF is up to the actual mirror less offerings. It is a pain to use the TSE lenses on my 6D ! So now I'm seriously considering to replace the 6D with an A7r plus adapter

Direct link | Posted on Mar 4, 2014 at 11:49 UTC as 45th comment
On Two photographers re-imagine city potholes article (147 comments in total)

Very funny and imaginative ! I like it.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 2, 2014 at 15:00 UTC as 30th comment
On Exposing another side of Sochi article (178 comments in total)

It is funny : the landscape standing in the background of the stage in picture 5 is a typical tourist view of the lake of Geneva it represents the Castle of Chillon with the Dents du Midi (the mountain in the back). It is seen from Montreux. Another picture seems to represent the Asian bay of Halong (although I'm not really sure of that last location)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2014 at 13:39 UTC as 45th comment | 1 reply
On Sony Alpha 7R Review preview (795 comments in total)

Can you compare the final scores with other cameras ? On my iPad this usual feature of the DPreview widget is not present !

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2014 at 08:31 UTC as 146th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4: a quick summary article (471 comments in total)

"and a minimum shutter speed of 1/8000 sec "

Isn't that the maximum shutter speed, being the fastest one ?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2014 at 06:07 UTC as 110th comment | 5 replies
On Adobe leaks 'Lightroom Mobile' app article (212 comments in total)

So here it comes : after the monthly PS fee, now an LR annual fee. Noway i'm giving in.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 18, 2014 at 23:53 UTC as 42nd comment

It is interesting these continual extensions of the 9.99$ Photographers' deal :
What this tells me is that they didn't reach their subscription goal.

I for one didn't subscribe. Here in Switzerland, even after our VAT deduction, we still have to pay 40% more than US customers. I'm definitely fed up with Adobe. I own PSCS6 plus LR5 and won't get into CC.

I'm investing in other products like Capture One and DXO. i will see what to do when i can no more use CS6.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 17, 2014 at 09:28 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply
Total: 180, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »