tkbslc

tkbslc

Lives in United States Salt Lake City, UT, United States
Joined on May 30, 2008

Comments

Total: 2291, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Gesture: Take the challenge, Canon. Navigate an APS-C (Canon type: 1.6 crop) modle to EVF finder.

You mean alienate their most loyal customer base?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 07:13 UTC
In reply to:

RichRMA: 4th breathless article on another run-of-the-mill DSLR?

As opposed to ANOTHER mirrorless compact body?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 07:11 UTC
In reply to:

jennyrae: I will buy this camera........................for $1,000.

With patience, I'm sure that will be an option.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2014 at 07:10 UTC
On Size matters: Hands-on with Canon PowerShot G7 X article (175 comments in total)

I still think it is a bit of a stretch to call a 40mm thick camera "pocketable". Certainly not comfortably, and certainly not with any kind of concern for camera safety.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 21, 2014 at 19:47 UTC as 8th comment

Seems like you left a lot out between LX3 and RX100, but I agree with the article's opinion overall.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 19:19 UTC as 43rd comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Eugene232: I am waiting for a Ricoh GR 2..
35mm, titled screen, pocket size, no VF
for reasonable price, as Fuji X100 too overpriced

The Ricoh extends when you power it on, actually. Same with Coolpix A. It might be faster than waiting on a multi-segment zoom to extend, but it's still not true that you don't have to wait for it.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 19:14 UTC
In reply to:

Jefftan: the 30X zoom on small sensor compact is just a waste of money in my opinion

try this, get a NEX-3N, put in a pancake lens like the E-mount 20mm, than using the in camera digital zoom (or even better turn off all NR in RAW conversion) ,than crop out the central area having the same scene as a 30X zoom image (remember to switch to central focus)

try it and you will be surprised, the resulting pic will be as least as good as from 30X small sensor compact if not better

That works up to about 3x crop zoom if you have a really good lens.

3x zoom is 1/9 the original resolution. 2x zoom is 1/4 the original resolution. 4x would be 1/16th, 5x would be 1/25. 6x would be 1/36, 7x 1/49 and so on.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 19:10 UTC
In reply to:

Jefftan: unfortunate that tough camera is still stuck in 2009, is t it really that difficult to at least put in waterproof for all these premium compact?

even with no zoom or limited zoom will be popular I bet
I have been waiting literally for years

Q:Is it really that difficult to put in waterproof to all these cameras?
A:YES!!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 19:08 UTC
In reply to:

fastlass: re price:
I think that a lot of people fail to realize that $500-$1000 for a camera isn't that much money for a big portion of the market. Then tell these folks that the new breed of compacts is, for all intents and purposes, as good as the 4+ year old DSLRs they bought in the later aughts, but smaller and more stylish, and you have a pretty good sized TAM.

They replace a DSLR perfectly for "general purpose" photographers. Which is what probably 95% of camera buyers are.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 19:06 UTC
In reply to:

peevee1: "Why the death of the point and shoot"

Rumors of their death are greatly exaggerated. Fixed-lens cameras still sell many times the number of ILCs. And excellent products like RX10, FZ1000, LX100 and G7X will only reinforce this advantage.

They still sell twice as many compacts, but the margins are extremely poor. That's why they are making more premium models to get profit margin back up.

You used to pay $250-400 for a good, middle of the road compact. Now it's $100-200 tops. And they are having to put ever more complex massive zooms in them and wifi to get them to sell at all.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 19:03 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1414 comments in total)
In reply to:

bauerman: Looks like a nice pat on the back to Fuji for camera design from Panasonic...to me.

Panasonic actually mentioned the LC1 in the product launch material. That's the only reason it came to mind, as I had long forgotten that camera. Panasonic is copying their own Leica co-designed stuff from a decade ago, not Fuji. And of course we all know Fuji is just making cheaper Leica clones, anyway, so if you want to give design credit, it's to German companies and their original rangefinder designs.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 15:48 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1414 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rexyinc: missed opportunity? or will this be an expensive add-on later?

they should of put a couple high powered 3w LEDs for a video light on that flashy unit :) - Then I would bother to carry it around :)

... just saying.. oh hey what's on kick starter these days?

Shoe mounted LED just blind people in your videos.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 04:43 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1414 comments in total)
In reply to:

bauerman: Looks like a nice pat on the back to Fuji for camera design from Panasonic...to me.

Uh, no. See the Panasonic LC1 from 2004

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 04:40 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1414 comments in total)
In reply to:

mosc: I'm noting with this lens/sensor size combination that it's very video focused. It's exactly the size to capture 16:9 8mp 3840x2160 UHD 4K video from a 12mp sensor (standard 4/3 2x crop ratio). This is a 16mp sensor so it actually has to crop a bit to get down to 8mp (26mm focal equivalent instead of 2x10.9mm).

This lens would be just big enough if down the road we have a 24mp 4/3rds sensor and you wanted to capture 6K UHD (5760x3240). Maybe that's down the line for this lens on another body in the Panasonic game plan?

With the multi-aspect sensor it doesn't have to crop to do 16:9.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 04:37 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1414 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Doleman: Maybe I'm missing something, but given the price-point, why on Earth would I select this camera over the GM5?

The pancake lens for the GM5 is f3.5-5.6. This one is F1.7-2.8.

The closest m4/3 lens you could put on the GM5 is the 12-35mm f2.8 and it's $1000 alone and is only f2.8 on the long end. In addition it's not anywhere close to a tiny pancake lens.

So $1800 for GM5 and 12-35mm and nowhere near compact, or $900 for this and get a faster lens and a camera the size of a GM5 with a kit zoom.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 04:34 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1414 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: WHY IS THIS CAMERA BIG NEWS? RICOH RELEASED A FULLY POCKETABLE CAMERA WITH AN !!!APS-C!!!! SIZED SENSOR 2 YEARS AGO (RICOH GR). THE ONLY THING THIS PANASONIC HAS OVER THE GR IS THE 4K VIDEO AND AN EVF. WHO CARES? NOBODY HAS 4K TVs. PLUS IT HAS BEEN PROVEN THAT FROM A NORMAL VIEWING DISTANCE, THERE IS NO VISIBLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 4K TV AND 1080P TV, so anybody who buys a 4k TV is mad. Most photographers are not interested in taking 4k video anyway, unless they want to make documentaries, in which case, who cares whether you have a pocketable camera or not.

Ricoh had a fairly slow, wide fixed focal length, unexciting design and ergonomics and no viewfinder built in. That's why this is more exciting. This LX100 can really be an all around camera instead of a niche one.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 04:32 UTC
In reply to:

Franco8: This will be awesome on a 4/3 camera hopefully it will happen

standard 4/3? Even Olympus has abandoned that.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 04:20 UTC
In reply to:

AngryCorgi: Only $300 for the red Leica sticker? That's the cheapest I can remember Leica selling their red stickers for. Must be a down economy.

~$150 if you need/want a lightroom license.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 21:48 UTC
In reply to:

Michel Cojan: Don't quite get the 24-75mm equivalent focal lens here: with 4/3 format the multiplication factor (if I remember well) was 2x (i.e. 25mm focal lens = 50mm). Truble is, both Pana LX100 and D-Lux are using a lens specified as 10.9 to 34mm. That would make more like... 22 to 68mm (strict 4/3 sensor format). Anyone has a clue on that? (Other than that they both look quite promising).

It depends how you look at it. Due to the way the sensor is laid out, yes, you end up with a smaller diagonal than regular 4/3, but you may end up with a larger horizontal or vertical. For example, the 16:9 mode would be significantly wider than a 24mm shot on a regular 4:3 sensor. It would maybe have a 2.2x crop diagonal, but it might have a 1.8x crop horizontal FOV. (just example numbers, not actual calculations)

I remember with my LX5 that had a multiaspect sensor, in 16:9 mode the image from the 24mm equiv lens was as wide as if it had been shot on a 21mm lens at 4:3 aspect and then cropped. It's hard to visualize until you've used one of panasonic's multii-aspect sensors.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 21:45 UTC
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: This camera is so good it is even worth Leica prices. If Panasonic charged Leica prices for the LX100 people would still buy it. Just wait till all of the LX100s sell out instantly. The Leica option will start to become more appealing instead of a 3 month wait for the back ordered LX100s.

I asked my wife (not a gear geek) to guess the price on the LX100 given the specs and she guessed $1500 based off what we'd paid for our SLR+lenses. $900 is a bargain for the lens alone. This is $300 more but includes $150 worth of software so the red badge is only $150 really.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 21:36 UTC
Total: 2291, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »