The D4 is also referred to as an HD-SLR so 4k is not a must.
I had a Pany GX1 for travel and was considering the GX7 but I've always admired the Xtrans sensor and this might be the compact system for me.
For me the most impressive thing here is the Sony RX100 II. It stands up well against the others despite the smallest sensor.
4.8-6.7, they must be joking.
Thank you for the lesson. I now have a better appreciation of the tilt/shift lens.
Very impressed so far. Other sites have shown comparison with Canon35/1.4 L and the Sigma betters it many ways. So far no comparisons with Nikon. I have this preordered.
oselimg: It seems like that it's possible to make good lenses for a reasonable price. Are you listening Canon, Nikon, Zeiss, Leica!!!!?. I hope someone will do the same with cameras too, especially with the FF ones.
It's no different from other men's toys.The more expensive, the more exclusive and that's what they want. Nothing wrong with that.
First non Nikon lens for me.
There must be a new body in the works to go with these expensive lenses.
I'll be ordering one. Excellent specs for the price and the size suits me for travel.Thanks Nikon.
I was very excited at first, BUT from previews, the biggest failure is the AF system.
Does this apply to North American bodies too or should I wait for Nikon USA/Canada ?
imagenes_vivas: Why not Raw in an high spec camera?
Who shoots RAW with a P&S ?
Thanks for your impressions. I'm a bit disappointed that Nikon could only match the D3s performance in general with a few added features but the AF sounds amazing. Despite this, I look forward to my D4 next week.
The V1 3" screen has 921K-dots according to Nikon's site, not 460K as listed above.