mcslsk

mcslsk

Lives in Germany Berlin, Germany
Joined on Feb 18, 2012

mcslsk's recent activity

  • The JPEG engine of the MKII works fine. You just have to make sure you expose for the lights as you won't be able to recover blown highlights. I have yet to find any camera that produces on a ...
  • Jostian, rather than continue going on and on about the test, why don't you take a look at my post on IQ with samples images? You can compare the G1X at 24 2.0 vs the NEX with the Sigma at 2.8 and ...
  • Replied in IQ G1X/G1XMKII
    And because the G1X MKII often is compared to the RX100M2, here are two images taken with the Sony at 28mm(10mm) and 1.8 and 5.6 respectively:
  • Replied in IQ G1X/G1XMKII
    ... and side by side.
  • Replied in IQ G1X/G1XMKII
    Thank you, I did this to ease my pain :-) Here are two images, one converted in DPP to TIFF16 and adjusted in LR5.5, the other one adjusted in LR5.5 with use of Canon Standard profile. WB is a bit ...
  • Replied in IQ G1X/G1XMKII
    Here are some images taken with the NEX6 and the Sigma 19mm and the 35/1.8. The primes are not bad - but also not much, if at all, better than the MKII lens, which is a zoom.
  • Created discussions IQ G1X/G1XMKII
    After seeing some posts here saying that the original G1X lens provided better IQ than the one on the MKII (which, I must admit, was also my impression), I did some testing. You can find the test ...
  • G1X MKII 24mm 2.0 NEX6 Sigma 19mm 2.8 Sony RX100 MII 28mm 1.8
  • Same here, it doesn't look bad at all for an image taken in Auto mode and internal flash.
  • On a 15C° day, flat road, no wind, empty car, constant speed of 120 km/h, I get 750 km out of my Volvo XC90. Normal driving, 450km max. I do not see those high numbers (neither on my G1X nor on ...
  • The number is about right if you don't play much, no flash. I bought a scond battery with the camera because no matter how you slice and dice it, the battery doesn't last long enough for a full ...
  • Yes, the LR has been adjusted a little. But in terms of detail rendering, that had no impact. What really made a difference is setting sharpening in DPP to 0 (as suggested further down in this ...
  • Created discussions DPP vs. LR G1X Mk II
    This is strange. Please look at the images below. I don't why DPP is removing so much detail from the image comared to LR. All NR in DPP is turned off! Yet it looks as if there is heavy NR at ...
  • Thanks, Dale. I was particularly impressed by how well the little flash performs and how the camera hadles fill flash. I think better than the previous model.
  • Created discussions G1X MKII at Birthday function
    Just a few. I am very happy with how the camera performed. Used the EVF and the built in flash for fill. Nice balance, good highlight protection. AF worked well without issues. And one from my ...
  • My fault. Just wanted to say that for me using the larger box (as suggested in my first post) does not solve the issue.
  • Sorry, changing the size of the AF box does not work as a fix in low light/contrast situations
  • I was able to recreate the issue. My AF frame was set to small (because conventional wisdom for the G1X was it is faster). Set it back to large and did not run into this issue again. Will continue ...
  • Replied in Nonsense.
    This is the image after quick and dirty LR. Given the heavy under exposure in the shadows, not bad.
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
Total messages 971
Threads started 38
Last post 7 hours ago
Total comments 54
Total likes 80
Last post 5 months ago
Total reviews 0
Entries 0
Votes cast 0
Photos uploaded 157
Last upload 2 months ago