Jun2

Can this lens adapted to NEX?

Quality is not cheap.  If the lens is used to make money, it's definitely worth it.  Otherwise, stay with Sigma or Sony.  I still like my $100 Sigma 30mm.

In other words, he wants the government to pay his collection through a big Tax deduction, while he can simply give them to someone like me. It all depends how much he wants to deduct. I will not...

Can I have them?

Can I have them? I live in NYC.

Try different lens. Power zoom uses more battery.

Fuji mount version has aperture ring, that's good.

Current M4/3 cameras from Panasonic and Olympus.  Older generations, Gh2 and G5.

looking good

who reads news paper?

The news paper is not doing well, cutting cost to buy sometime.

The news paper is not doing well, cutting cost to buy some time.

THe ring of the pipe that prevents over-flooding.

Front focus with D700 (check the metal ring inside the sink-sharper in D700).

agree. 1/2.3" doesn't offer enough quality over phone cameras. 1" is good for new PnS.

GH2 with improved multi-aspect ratio sensor (better dynamic range similar to GH3 DR), also improved AF and movie data rate.

something must be wrong.  A900 and 12-24mm combo can't be that soft in the middle of frame.

Sony version is alos available there (in stock)

Good optics are never cheap. This is bargin, that can help Pros make money.

no. There is a new version of 30mm 1.4 with better edge sharpness for $500.