hindesite

Is there any way we can get to "like" individual photos? There are quite often threads that are asking for people to give feedback about which image(s) are preferred, and of other posts with...

Shouldn't be a real risk. Most people will have a wrist strap fitted. I certainly did, and found the switch position to be pretty acceptable, and far better than the E-P1 where you cannot tell...

Thanks, I'd agree with most of the review. Maybe my older lens isn't very good - it was one of the first to be produced - and my new lens is a good example; but for me, there is certainly no...

There is no downside to the plastic mount. It is not a big deal. At all. We are looking at a lens that weighs slightly more than 100g and is very short when stowed. The durability of the mount is...

I have both, and while I cannot speak to focus speed (both are slow on my E-P1) the older lens is not sharper than the later one. In fact in almost every respect, the II version is much better and...

Nice, a really great idea. See you even got some clouds over the green, too.

EXIF intact. OOC. YMMV.

Was the shutter replaced? http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3483655

2.10 is not confusing, once you realise that this numbering system is very common.

My description was wrong, the numbers to the right of the dot are integers, not decimal.

2.100 is a much later...

No, 2.10 is after 2.8 (the digits after the point are normal decimal).

Next after 2.10 would for example be 2.12, and so on.

I've tried using alternatives to GIMP, and I find it very hard to move...

That's a great way to digitise film, easy to use and takes up less space when not being used. But film scanners do have advantages for aged media, since they can use an IR channel to correct/reduce...

You need a step up ring - 52mm - 58mm. The ring you have probably looks like this: But the ring you need looks like this (for...

Try Avidemux. Its free and has very good codec support, is capable of copying video so does not re-encode. Aimed mainly at simple editing - trimming, crops, resizing, colour, sharpness, fades...

I'm guessing at least $1500, and hoping I'm wrong - but I don't really care. I'm pretty sure that no matter how nice this camera is, it isn't the camera for me.

I see so many people thinking they have to have the latest and greatest, and the capabilities and intricacies of the E-M5 just confuse them. Look at the questions asked in this forum, for example....

Unless its an E-P5. The description of the poor functionality of the wifi on the E-P5 defies belief - especially considering it was released well after the GH3.

I very much doubt there is any electrical damage to the camera, the battery contacts are so far off-set and asymmetric that if the battery is reversed there is no way any electrical contact can be...

First, treat any online presence that you don't have full control over as probably temporary, there are no guarantees as to continuity, I've lost count of the number of services I've tried which...

Same here, very slack - would have been helpful for them to let me know (as they said they would). Paid in after about 4 weeks after the claim was accepted. All good.

Has anyone received their rebate yet? My application was accepted back in February, but I haven't received any notification of the refund to date. Olympus said to allow for up to 8 weeks for the...