Flashback: You have to get use to these type of reviews!
My Leica X images are still best I've ever made. Simply put, Leica know how to put magic into a lens. That's what you are paying for.
Utter rubbish! To paraphrase A Adams,
"The file is the score and the edit the performance"
jimread: Hello all,
I would agree with the posters here that the above are good, very good indeed. Maybe and this is just my personal opinion of course, the photographer should look through their work and look for a theme, or thread and find something that they can turn into a coherant project.
If you make series of images, photo essays, or bodies of work jpgmag is a good place to post them. They allow what they call 'Stories' where you can post 10 images and some text next to them. I've not found any other site that does it in this particular way, all the others seem to concentrate on the single image. I was very pleased to have found it.
This is one of my offerings: http://jpgmag.com/stories/19757
Cheers - Jim
 tried to get the link to work, there doesn't appear to be anyway of doing it, ah well, such is life
Looks good thanks for the link.  Expensive though
[edit2] Could set up a webpage exactly the same myself with a domain name for $18 per annum
I'm also setting up a Photo Book Club meet just off M1Ju29: http://www.m1ju29photobookclub.co.uk/
Andrew Higgins: I'm curious why Panasonic's m43rds range, and the m43 system, has not caught the imagination of photographers like Fuji's X series. Even Olympus seem to have promoted their m43rds cameras a bit better, overall excellent though the m43rds system is, Fuji seem to be winning the format 'war'.
We went to the Yorkshire Sculpture Park a few days ago, I was astonished at the amount of people carrying Lumix cameras didn't see one Fuji or Olympus. After the 1st half dozen I made a point of looking and even asked a few people what the camera was, if I couldn't see the name.
Lots of G series from 1 to GH4, but then they are so much more intuitive than the offerings from the other manufacturers.
I can see here the real definition of 'Equivalence'. Minor White would be moved to tears by these.
Michael Piziak: No need to buy any retouching tools now that I've got Gimp.
GIMP's a snail
PSP is counter intuitive
CS6 is a Greyhound
I got far more interesting results with a TtV contraption.
Marko Laurits: It could be my monitor or myself but colour of the sky at these photos is somehow different from what I have seen in real life.
If you would like to calibrate your monitor there is a free program that you can use to get within half a Gnats knacker of using an expensive setter: http://www.calibrize.com/
It works very well indeed and once done several times to get the hang of it you can then go on to create your own printer profiles (the ability to do this is within every printer) and be able to print what you see on your screen. easy peasy no cost at all.
jimread: I have a 4/3rds Panasonic G2 and a full frame 5D Mk 1 both 12MP. I took the same two scenes one close up one landscape with both cameras, 50mm 1.8 on the 5D and the 14-45 lens set at 25mm on the G2 both at f8. I then got 4 12" x 18" prints done they are indistinguishable I was amazed I thought the 5D would knock spots off the G2.
It seems odd to me that the G range has gone downhill since the G2 with menu driven controls. Panasonic use Leica lenses yet insist on changing things constantly unlike Leitz who have stuck to a basic good design for 70+ years.
I fell about laughing at your answer Maverick, Is everyone going to buy a hi-res monitor? And if that's the case with prints I might as well go back to my 5MP Casio.
I have a 4/3rds Panasonic G2 and a full frame 5D Mk 1 both 12MP. I took the same two scenes one close up one landscape with both cameras, 50mm 1.8 on the 5D and the 14-45 lens set at 25mm on the G2 both at f8. I then got 4 12" x 18" prints done they are indistinguishable I was amazed I thought the 5D would knock spots off the G2.
Raw Jaw: "Flip-out LCD helpful for video and tripod work"
Sorry, but this 'Pro' comment indicates to me the reviewer has no knowledge of what a fully articulating LCD can be used for.
The real value of the NX30's fully articulating LCD is for handheld vertical stills from floor level to overhead, (eg. Toddlers to Stage Performers).
This is critical for Event Photography and is something a DPReviewer should know about or learn about before picking up a camera to review it.
Also in situations where you have to get really close to a wall in order to get the maximum area in a shot. Only a fully articulated screen will do for this. I use a Panny G2, mirrorless is far better than the DSLR crap.
Black Box: Americans make only 5% of the world's population, yet they have 25% of the world's prisoners. Land of the free...
Americans talk a lot about the value of freedom, but are actually afraid of anyone who truly exhibits it. Easy Rider 1969
I really like this Dan, must have been a instantaneous decision, and it payed off.
Really great - Jim
Abaregi: Whats the point if you can buy and DSLR with an APS-C for the same price?
Is it not mirrorless and if so why not NEX sized?
I have a G2 4/3 and a 5D Mk1 FF both 12MP, at 12" x 18" prints are indistinguishable. I was surpised! The G2 is ohhh so much easier to use.
About time!! Do I need all this auto rubbush no!! Do I know the relationship between shutter speed/aperture/ISO? Yes I do.
Do I need anything else, NO
vFunct: You guys really need a proper photo viewer, with actual whitespace and removal of all the junk text/links around it.
Check out www.tinyvices.com for an idea of what I mean.
You hurt the photography by presenting it with such a crappy viewing experience.
A cleaner presentation is better.
Thanks for TinyVices great stuff on there. May I offer this in return: http://imagesfound.blogspot.co.uk/2009/04/in-beginning.html Not for the presentation but for the images therein.
For 10 years read 10 days of clubbish rubbish. May I suggest that the author begs, borrows or steals a copy of Don McCullin's Perspectives (not war but people on a similar edge of life)
bilcobarnes21: I dont understand what enjoyment people get, constantly bashing products, its rare people commment on these forums with something pleasant to say about a camera, its either pulling a camera to pieces or defending their prize possession by castigating the enemys camera/Brand of choice
I also think people shold realise what sort of a camera the GX7 is before comparing with their male jewerlally, D800's and Nano coated prime lenes or such like.
it really does take me a back, people need to get a life, i dont understand why they do it, especially when so many good dating sites are avaiable for these guys at the touch of a button.
You Know who you are..
I have something pleasant to say regarding a Panny G2 and a Canon 5D both 12mp. I took two pics of the same subject with each camera, G2 with 20mm and 5D with 50mm. And then got some 18" x 12" prints done, much to my surprise expecting the 5D ones to be much better especially with a landscape image, they were indistinguishable.
It seems to me that many of the opinions expressed all over this site are for and by nit'pic'kers rather than photographers.
Well I'm blowed!!! The same thing happened c.100 years ago with the development of the Cooke Triplet and the Zeiss Tessar. Prior to that lenses had more elements than you could shake a stick at.
Will it work, of course it will, will it be better, the Cooke and Zeiss designs certainly were.
This looks really great, if they sell bodies on their own I'll buy one.