billybones1918

down boy!

This

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brr4YVyNoFc

If you really need it, you'll take a deep breath and pay for it.

There are plenty of commercial photographers using C1 for their entire workflow. There are plenty of amateurs who will never need more functions than Aperture. Of course PS is wonderful and the...

Please don't judge others by your own standards

I say good riddance to expensive upgrades. Let designers fork out for Adobe products; there are more efficient alternatives for photographers.

the 55mm f/1.0 wil be called the "Tuoit Tuowoo"

Holding it in your hands is at least part way towards having any experience whatsoever with a lens, of which the OP has none. For Pete's sake, what a Richard Cranium remark!

He'd better sue DPR (or whoever they really are now) as well then for all the clicks and advertising they get as a result of posting the image without permission

Great lens for a pre-big day shoot with the couple relaxed and a bit more time to be creative. Even on the day there are stationary subjects that benefit from perspective control (cake, flowers etc...

What a tired and abused term "professional" has become. We're really talking about commercial photographers, people who's main source of income is selling images. This bogus 'pro' terminology is...

Yes, very good. Quick, accurate, quiet - so different from the chattering fool of a camera I originally bought.

Just another black rectangle, from a company who can do better

Adams used many different cameras and combinations over the years.

I was satisfied with OM10 and 50mm lens. Early 2000's 'went digital' with Canon G3 and probably should've stopped there. Wasted too much love and money on Canikon and eventually sold the lot to...

You can pinch the lens cap on the outer edge.

Jobs would've torn them a new hole

Yes, the diopter issue is a pain. The window with the supplied diopter removed is 0 correction. If you have perfect eyesight, the supplied diotper (-1) is unhelpful and can be replaced with a 0...