robogobo

robogobo

Lives in Switzerland Kriens, Luzern, Switzerland
Works as a Photo/Designer
Joined on Jan 12, 2009
About me:

my plan is to rule the WORLD!

Comments

Total: 67, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Apple to cease development of Aperture article (424 comments in total)

http://www.apertureexpert.com/tips/2014/6/28/comment-follow-demise-aperture#.U7EqjRaK-Vh

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2014 at 09:31 UTC as 16th comment
On Apple to cease development of Aperture article (424 comments in total)

Please, everybody calm down. Back away and look at the big picture. Much like FCPX, Pages 5, etc, the new Photos app will likely be anemic in the beginning and then have stuff added back in by request... level headed requests. For all intents and purposes, Photos is Aperture 4. Look at the screenshot. Look at the official statement. All your Aperture edits will carry over, and they'll be treated exactly like the move from Aperture 2 to Aperture 3. Old sliders will be treated as legacy and new sliders there to replace them.

All this panic and negative speculation doesn't do anybody good. Aperture will keep working just like it does now, even in Yosemite, and maybe Photos will even be better. Who knows? Let's wait and find out. And give Apple feedback through the official channels in a constructive, adult manner. https://www.apple.com/feedback/aperture.html

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2014 at 09:30 UTC as 17th comment | 8 replies
On Portfolio: Photography student Luke Evans article (172 comments in total)
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: I am old but I love to see students work to be exhibited here. More stuff like this!

And you will then be a student publication. Get it?

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 22:46 UTC
On Portfolio: Photography student Luke Evans article (172 comments in total)
In reply to:

dstate1: Once again we have proven that the internet is primarily a place for crabby middle aged losers to dole out brilliantly biting critiques...and search for porn.

Anyone who would write the kinds of things I see on this thread about a young artist is a walking turd in my book.

Perhaps the audience here would be more inclined to enjoy some still life's of fruit or perhaps more pictures of cats…as long as it's taken with the right lens of course….

College is a time to experiment, to study, to develop. It' snot the time to be artificially promoted into the media and given the impression of actual achievement. It's not about his work, which is good. It's about the appropriateness of a prominent photography news site digging for young talent where none exists. I'm not knocking the kid's work, but really, it's not THAT special.

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 22:41 UTC
On Portfolio: Photography student Luke Evans article (172 comments in total)
In reply to:

PeakAction: Some cool stuff, but I'm left wondering why it's being featured on the DPR front page... Slow photo news day?

So, you're featuring student work now? That's cutes and all, but you should probably leave that to the college newspaper. The work is ok but the kid lacks depth.

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2014 at 22:37 UTC
On Chicago-based Calumet Photographic closes U.S. stores article (195 comments in total)

Calumet didn't adapt to the times. It's that simple. Kind of sad as they were my first stop for a=everything I needed when I lived in Chicago. Even back in 2003 they were starting to get that stubborn, aged feeling. By the time I left chicago I was just buying bulk film from them.

They did have plenty of competition from Central Camera and Helix. Helix closed down last year. Central is pretty much all that's left.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2014 at 14:45 UTC as 15th comment
On Fujifilm XQ1 Preview preview (162 comments in total)

Why is APS-C now considered "standard"?

It's not standard for Compacts. It's not standard for DSLR.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 26, 2013 at 20:28 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

saycheese: >Nobody prints photos anymore.<

Do we not? oh, ok, would you mind telling me what else we don't do so I can compile a list to refer to, thanks in advance...

Stupidest thing I ever heard.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 26, 2013 at 20:19 UTC
On Canon EOS 6D In-Depth Review preview (49 comments in total)

After a long deliberation, I decided to upgrade from my 5Dii to the 6D. Some may call it a sidegrade or even a downgrade, but for me, image quality is everything, and the ablity to focus and shoot in low light is paramount. I'm very happy with my decision, and so far I don't miss any of the 5D line features. I'm getting shots I wouldn't have gotten with the 5Dii (maybe not even with the mark iii), and most importantly I can afford to upgrade every one or two years with the current price point of the 6D rather than three or four with the 5D. I'd rather have more frequent updates of sensor technology instead of being left with a better built, feature packed but obsolete camera for the same money.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 20, 2013 at 00:24 UTC as 19th comment
On Canon announces EOS M2 in Japan article (613 comments in total)
In reply to:

robogobo: Well, as a moderately happy owner of the original M, I'm used to this camera's being overlooked for not keeping up with the specs wars, but allow me to explain why I love my M despite its many flaws.

1) Canon glass. Not only is the 22mm tack sharp, but with the ef adapter I can use all my L glass, which do this APS-C sensor justice.

2) Image quality. The M definitely has one of the best IQ of all the mirrorless. If that's important to you, it's reason enough to get one.

3) AF problems were overblown. It had a rough start, but the firmware update finally fixed the AF problems. It's still not the fastest, but I don't find it a problem anymore.

4) I have to repeat: Image Quality.

This is my go everywhere camera with the 22mm, and my super compact lightweight backup/ b-cam that's always in my bag. I have an LCD magnifier on the back and throw on my 135/2L for a super fast tele while I have the 24-70 on my 5Dii. Perfect combo.

The M finally found its target price after several reductions. It should sell for about $400 with a kit lens. Maybe the M2 could bring $500. That's a bargain for great IQ if you can forego the bells a whistles. I just wonder how they managed to put wifi in it and get anywhere near decent battery life.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2013 at 20:24 UTC
On Canon announces EOS M2 in Japan article (613 comments in total)

Well, as a moderately happy owner of the original M, I'm used to this camera's being overlooked for not keeping up with the specs wars, but allow me to explain why I love my M despite its many flaws.

1) Canon glass. Not only is the 22mm tack sharp, but with the ef adapter I can use all my L glass, which do this APS-C sensor justice.

2) Image quality. The M definitely has one of the best IQ of all the mirrorless. If that's important to you, it's reason enough to get one.

3) AF problems were overblown. It had a rough start, but the firmware update finally fixed the AF problems. It's still not the fastest, but I don't find it a problem anymore.

4) I have to repeat: Image Quality.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2013 at 20:23 UTC as 113th comment | 4 replies
On Canon announces EOS M2 in Japan article (613 comments in total)
In reply to:

pacnwhobbyist: No Europe and US release tells me that Canon is not really seriously invested in mirrorless - at least not this system. No mention of a 55-250 lens either which if you look at other camera makers mirrorless systems, they pretty much all had one (or something similar) within a year after releasing their first mirrorless.

But they shot themselves in the foot by putting such a lousy AF system in the 1st gen EOS M, just like they did with the G1X. The EOS M is still a good camera, don't get me wrong, but why they chose to hobble the AF system like they did is a mystery to me.

They usually do Japan first.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2013 at 20:14 UTC
On Canon announces EOS M2 in Japan article (613 comments in total)
In reply to:

joe6pack: 2.3x faster AF refers to the original or latest firmware of EOS-M?

…with the latest firmware.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 3, 2013 at 20:12 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2817 comments in total)
In reply to:

robogobo: I would have been much more impressed if they made it without an LCD or buttons on the back. Just a digital SLR with only old school controls. No looking at the back of the camera after every shot. Just shoot and go.

But the point of no screen would be to eliminate the option of playback altogether. That would be truly retro. And it would make the camera way thinner too.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2013 at 22:43 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2817 comments in total)
In reply to:

precognito: A body that works well with legacy lenses and lends itself to old school two control shooting is interesting but the Df's execution doesn't work for me. I would have used the elegantly clean plain prism Fs and F2s as models rather than the FMs. I'm sure the Df is a fine camera, but I would be more impressed if the concept was even more retro. Why not go all the way and drop jpegs along with the movie mode. Make the Df a RAW only camera that emphasizes post processing over a confusion of in-camera settings. That way the body could be more streamlined by limiting the number of external controls and the shooting experience more film-like (pure?).

I commend Nikon for giving nostalgia a go. I still have the first F I bought in 1964 an miss the intuitive relationship I had with that series and the F2s and with the bags of Nikon lenses. They really were a pinnacle of photography's machine age.

Or how about no screen at all!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 28, 2013 at 22:40 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2817 comments in total)

I would have been much more impressed if they made it without an LCD or buttons on the back. Just a digital SLR with only old school controls. No looking at the back of the camera after every shot. Just shoot and go.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 22, 2013 at 00:23 UTC as 140th comment | 4 replies

commenters comment.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 29, 2013 at 11:40 UTC as 2nd comment
On Hands-on with Eye-Fi Mobi post (42 comments in total)

If it's any consolation, the X2 Pro cards aren't much better in terms of logical implementation. You can't send photos to multiple devices, so there goes its potential as a viewer during a shoot, and you can't elect to send jpegs to one device and RAW to another, so there goes its potential as a fully wireless studio solution. Why they insist on crippling their stuff is beyond me, but that's always been the way with EyeFi. "Pro" in name only.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2013 at 19:01 UTC as 19th comment
On Buyers' Guide: Best DSLRs and ILCs for under $1000 article (91 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kokeen4231: I think the pentax k30/50 should be considered too. Its got pretty great features for its price. I'm sure its below $1000 too.

Just my thoughts.

I've compared them side by side. My doors are still on. The K01 is a good camera, but the M's IQ is a bit better. And now that the AF is improved I couldn't be happier.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2013 at 08:56 UTC
On Buyers' Guide: Best DSLRs and ILCs for under $1000 article (91 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kokeen4231: I think the pentax k30/50 should be considered too. Its got pretty great features for its price. I'm sure its below $1000 too.

Just my thoughts.

I like the EOS M. Since its firmware update it's a very responsive camera and the IQ is fantastic.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2013 at 18:59 UTC
Total: 67, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »