stageshadow

stageshadow

Lives in Austria Lower Austria St.Pölten, Austria
Works as a Event engineer
Joined on Apr 16, 2009

Comments

Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7
On Nikkor 18-140mm F3.5-5.6G ED VR hints at mid-range DSLR news story (191 comments in total)
In reply to:

Der Steppenwolf: This lens is is just another crap along with 16-85, 18-70, 18-55 (2 of those!!!) 18-135 and 18-200 and 18-300. All slow, plasticky with so so optical quality, what the hell happened to Nikon ?
Who there thinks that we need slow zoom number 8 on a DX system ?
Are you on drugs Nikon ?

16-85 is the best dx consumer Lens...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2013 at 13:17 UTC
On Nikon D800 preview (1118 comments in total)
In reply to:

stageshadow: On par with d7000 and 5dmk2, nice details!
Not bad at all!

Don´t think so, but i was away and had just my IPAD with me.
And yeah, on my imac they look really better!
I mainly looked at higher iso, at lower iso it beat everything except the Pentax 645D.
Across the iso range the details are much better, but noise levels above iso 800 are on par with D7000(not a bad thing)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 22, 2012 at 08:40 UTC
On Preview:olympusEM5 (1364 comments in total)
In reply to:

stageshadow: OM-D VS. Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000 have clearly better Details from iso200-iso800
At iso1600 and above the OM-D nearly matches the D7000's output.

Not Bad at all!

@Bart Hickman
Thank you for the input!
You are right, didn´t thought about that.
Still impressed with the Test shots....

Posted on Mar 22, 2012 at 08:08 UTC
On Nikon D800 preview (1118 comments in total)

On par with d7000 and 5dmk2, nice details!
Not bad at all!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2012 at 07:27 UTC as 74th comment | 2 replies
On Preview:olympusEM5 (1364 comments in total)

OM-D VS. Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000 have clearly better Details from iso200-iso800
At iso1600 and above the OM-D nearly matches the D7000's output.

Not Bad at all!

Posted on Mar 19, 2012 at 10:04 UTC as 38th comment | 3 replies
On Preview:olympusEM5 (1364 comments in total)
In reply to:

happy snapper uk: There must be something wrong with the test as compared to nikon 7000 it beats it in every way...can this be true? sharper and less noise or does my eyes need testing?And makes my gh2 look crap

Sorry, but the gh2 Look crap (in this comparison).
I found the Nikon D7000 has clearly better Details up to iso 800.
But at Iso1600 and above the OM-D comes very close to the output of the d7000...

Posted on Mar 19, 2012 at 09:57 UTC
In reply to:

thx1138: The P&S camera market is under siege from the phone cameras and yet although this offers a novel feature it's still a tiny sensor offering not much improvement over the 1/4" sensors. Time to move this class of camera up to the 1/1.8"-1/1.5" sensors while the advanced P&S move to 2/3" or larger. No use complaining that it'll make it bigger, as people aren't buying this class of camera anyway. The likes of the LX-5, XZ-1 etc aren't that much larger at all anyway.

Go for a pentax Q with prime!
And if you ever need a 3x zoom, there is also a standard Zoom for that!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 26, 2012 at 08:22 UTC
Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7