dark goob

Hell yeah! C'mon Olympus, you're next!

Or just get an E-PL5 and the 75mm f/1.8 and it's better and cheaper...

Or an E-P5 with a 45mm f/1.8, 17mm f/1.8, and VF-2 :=p

You had to buy it to figure that out? I am sorry man. There are a few good uses for that camera like for some video stuff, but yeah, it was really beta hardware and they've washed their hands of it.

Light intensity is f/1.2 level meaning it will AF in very low light, OK. But depth of field is NOT the same as an 85mm f/1.2 or a 45mm 1.2 etc. The people who are saying the smaller apertures at...

The entire 1-system is insane. It's all about Nikon making lots of money, lets be honest.

There is no such thing as equivalent. You want a 54.4-degree horizontal AoV. Just say what you want, instead of casting things in terms of nearly-dead, minority formats all the time.

43.6mm f/1.8 in 4/3"

That's like putting racing tires on a golf cart.

I added a new topic on photoshop.com since they obviously closed that one: http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lightroom_4_4_messing_up_olympus_raw_files?rfm=1

I have Viewer, which I like, and would use exclusively if only its RAW rendering did not go excruciatingly slowly even on my top-of-the-line Mac Pro with a Fermi GPU... What's Iridient Developer?...

That's a very kludgy solution as it generates a copy of the RAW file in so doing. .....  Sometimes I really scratch my heads. When they made Lightroom and Aperture, what in the heck were they...

It's made in China though. Isn't that the Yuan? It just occurred to me... perhaps Olympus is going after the FujiFilm X100S buyers with this thing. That's the only thing that actually makes sense...

On Sony NEX almost all the lenses are optically stabilized and they've had focus peaking since the beginning. Most consumers will not differentiate the stabilizer being in the lens or body. As an...

I'm not saying the E-P5 isn't a nice piece of hardware. It's really nice. I would love to have one.  I'm just being critical of their marketing strategy.

Exactly my point. Exactly my point. Exactly my point. No, bad point. People who are OK with big will buy the OM-D. People who want small, but for whom the E-PL5 is too low-end, still do not have...

The E-M5 was $999.99 for the body on the day it came out. That's still the list price. The E-P5 is $999.99 for the body, for basically the same camera minus a bunch of major features. I fail to see...

Yeah but why can't they add those features to the EM-5? I feel kinda gypped. Olympus never has good firmware updates. They never add substantial new features in firmware like Sony and Canon do. The...

EP5 makes no sense. Body is the same price as OMD body. Hello, this is dumb. You give up the weather sealing and OVF, and lose the option of HLD-6, yet pay the same? What?Do they really think...

Placed 35^th in the challenge. Beautiful sunlight showing all the colors :D