Camera Oly C-750UZ, SP-550UZTCON 1.7
D Webb: Very well done Samsung. This is a very capable company which outsells Apple in the smartphone market and I am very pleased they have been so ambitious and pulled this off as well as anyone could ask them to. I love the fact that this is a mirrorless DSLR. AF as good as the supposed king of sports crop cameras, wonderful video, great DR, great ergonomics. What's not to like?IF this had been made by Nikon, the faithful would have been dancing in the streets and announced A New Age come.
Limited 1st party lenses. You need glass to take a photo.
It looks like a nice product, but I have no confidence that a company with it's hands in all things electronic will still be in the camera business 5-10 years out, especially with the continued sales decline in the premium camera market. It's all about the glass in front and established 1st party camera companies still refine, innovate, and make new lenses, and have lens roadmaps. In addition other 2nd party manufacturers are making other innovative/responsive lenses for Canon, Nikon, and m4/3.
(unknown member): nothing says dull, flat and lifeless quite like an M4/3rds camera
@webrunner5 You're looking in the wrong places, try this one:
Patrick Kristiansen: If one needs 40+mp's to crop a pic into something worth watching, one is not taking one's pics right. And 16mp is enough for just about anyone without a very special need. Not many lenses justify a higher resolution either. And not to mention the need for exceedingly high shutterspeed and/or tripods. Nah, super-high resoultion is bonk imo. Can't wait to receive my em1 and 12-40 lens. And can wait even less to try out my OM-lenses on it.
You know what they say about the guy who buys the Ferrari - he's probably trying to compensate for something. Your tired arguments sound like the same folks who said they would never go digital or that digital could never hold its own with film cameras. You do understand that some folks cannot afford 5D3s and its costly system or Ferraris. Sorry - but there is room for both m4/3 and FF.
The White Paper by Metabones on this intriguing adapter is quite interesting and has more examples of its performance:
Trollshavethebestcandy: I find it interesting naysaying 400% pixel peepers demanding perfection from a revolutionary introduction 1st generation new technology (to consumer cameras) adapter that does so much at only $600. dont buy it if you are so righteously offended that smaller sensors can use FF lenses and get similar results and then some. What a bunch of wet blanket elitists. Go have fun with your gear and applaud new technology and the people who have the courage and brains to create something worth while. Geez! if there was no innovation you would all still be using peep hole cameras! you lot must be quite the life of the party. What have you created? My hats off to the men behind this. I cant wait to use one. Some valid points about some issues but you dont have to use one. Manual focus primes on this and vor video will be a boon. This will only get better. Where was digital photography 10 years ago? look at it today!
Hey - you're ruining the fun of the folks who like to stare at blown up photos of test patterns all day and complain about them!
b534202: 300mm, f/6.7 and no IS. They just don't want to sell to Panasonic body owners eh?
With the success and popularity of 5 axis IBIS, likely this will come to future PEN cameras too. The ability to use legacy 4/3 lenses (such as Zuiko lenses) without IS on the OM-D is a super nice option. There are many examples in these forums of folks with Panny m4/3 bodies using Oly m4/3 lenses. The skill and technique of photographer will come more into play depending on the lens. But over the years IS lenses has never been a priority of Olympus.
Panasonic makes a perfectly good 300mm m4/3 lens with IS.
sean000: I'm excited. I hope they didn't cut any corners to get the lower price. I might actually sell my Nikon 300mm f/4. I know my Nikon is superior optically, but I've seen samples from the original version of the Oly that are pretty close for being muche smaller and lighter.
Many people in this forum don't understand the m4/3 concept or the physics of optics.
No joke - the first version of this lens performs well in the right hands:
Don't forget that m4/3 is an evolution of camera, not meant to duplicate traditional SLRs. There is room for all.
Henry Falkner: Your camera reviews are few and far between. You can't afford to allow yourselves to be distracted with baggage.
The author is a freelancer and not one of the regular staff writers of dpreview, thus their regular camera reviewers are not being taken away from their duties. I welcome reviews on accessories. Thank goodness dpreview is selective on the cameras they review, rather than review many cameras that are not deserving of attention.
mbrobich: So what, get a swab and clean the damn thing. I can't believe all the babies out there crying about dust or oil spots on all the new Nikon cams. It takes freakin 2 minutes, wipe wipe wipe and your done !!!!!!!!!!!! Wahh wahhh wahhh
WARNING - You should be very careful about cleaning your camera sensor. Many companies will void your warranty (including Nikon) if they detect that you have touched the sensor. Follow all instructions provided by the company. Hopefully Nikon will address this problem satisfactorily.
Steve Balcombe: Is that a knob to hold the lens hood in place on the 75/1.8? Seems very clumsy if it is.
Also I had to laugh at the label "LENS HOOD". Do Olympus bodies have "BODY" written on them so owners know what they are?
Hoods labeled to re-unite proper hood to brand specific lens, and to reorder if damaged or lost.
R Stacy: I mentioned [here] about needing a 42.5 or 45mm fast prime lens as far back as 2004 for 4/3. What a sweet set up that would have been in 4/3 with a 12mp E2 (even the E1). I suppose it's cool it's finally here, but frankly 4/3 is gone as far as any professional (or even semi-por) mind goes, so in 2011 I no longer care about it for MFT. It's got to be a cool propostion though for the budding MFT fold, although I'm not sure exactly why.
What, you gonna photograph Brittany Spears with a EPL ?
I'm not going to photograph Brittany Spears with anything, leave that to the paparazzi. :)