Chris2210

This policy is not entirely unprecedented - Quark became very complacent about a near monopoly in the publishing industry and Adobe cleverly leveraged their ownership of Photoshop/Illustrator et al...

I work for a design agency and this move is similarly unwelcome amongst professionals. It's seen as a way of the company keeping a constant revenue stream at a maximised level - the pricing...

Except that resolution is not always measured by lines or pixels per inch. Many people prefer to express absolute resolution as the amount of visual information available - and that's more logical...

Fair enough - you do have to trial and error the exposures and shoot manually with strobes, whereas you can let the camera [or light meter] work out exposure for you in continuous lighting - which...

Having worked at a place that was cheap enough to think tungsten garden lights would do for studio work [thankfully objects, not people], I can vouch that the things get hot as hades - pretty...

There's so much smearing in this it looks as if NR has been heavily applied. I imagine noise would be much more evident at the top ISO otherwise. I suppose if you were reproducing for the web...

Looks like a nice lens - wonder how it will compare with the Panny 20mm f1.7?

That lens is smaller, [slightly] faster and cheaper - albeit build quality does not look so good. It is one of my...

Because an f2.8 isn't going to give a shallower DoF on an APSC camera than an F4 will on a 35mm size sensor.

Having said that, I'd agree this is ridiculous at this price point. Whilst it certainly...

Yeah but surely if you're photographing people you really don't want to be going lower than 1/60th of a second unless you can get them to stand perfectly still. I can see the sense of it on an AoV...

That's your inference.

I'm reminded of the famous statement by Gombrich, which goes something like "there are no bad reasons for liking a painting*; there are bad reasons for not liking a...

That's your inference.

I'm reminded of the famous statement by Gombrich, which goes something like "there are no bad reasons for liking a painting*; there are bad reasons for not liking a...

That's your inference.

I'm reminded of the famous statement by Gombrich, which goes something like "there are no bad reasons for liking a painting*; there are bad reasons for not liking a...

I really like what I've seen of these images. He is clearly a very technically proficient photographer and although these photographs may not have as wide an appeal as the typical staged and...

Nope - it's 1". Rather more than double the area of the S100's sensor. I've never been much of a Sony fan, but this looks almost like 'the ideal compromise' for a carry around camera.