LiquidSilver

LiquidSilver

Joined on Oct 12, 2010

Comments

Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7
On Sony a6000 First Impressions Review preview (899 comments in total)
In reply to:

Donnie G: Someone mentioned that cameras with in lens stabilization were not capable of more sophisticated 5 axis stabilization as implemented in Oly's in body stabilization design. WRONG. Check the specs on Canon's G1 X mII. The new Canon gives you 5 axis stabilization with body and in lens IS and without moving the camera sensor around.

@Donnie, do you wonder why camera makers don't do all 5 axis in software without complicated mechanical movements?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 15, 2014 at 12:23 UTC
On Nikon video hints at long-desired 'digital FM' article (554 comments in total)

I wonder how much post-processing and color correction was done in the promo video.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 26, 2013 at 09:36 UTC as 108th comment | 1 reply
On How many megapixels do you need? post (221 comments in total)
In reply to:

CameraLabTester: How many megapixel articles do we really need to churn out here, at DPREVIEW CONNECT, to get your attention on the NOKIA LUMIA 1020 AT 38 Mega Peek Sells?

.

I think the Lumia 1020 deserve it, and not because of "megapixels" but because its camera is in a league of its own.

Since I'd like an Android "1020", I hope that all this publicity and interest can nudge Samsung & Co.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 16:30 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2142 comments in total)
In reply to:

sdribetahi: Does just adding two wheels and customization buttons make a camera 'pro'? It still doesn't give you the option of shallow DOF, or AF of FAST moving objects. Anyone can add buttons to a p&s as well. Doesn't make it pro.

I see most of "pro" using APS-C and f6-f7 eq lenses like the Canon F4 L, that, according dxomark, perform worse than the native lenses on m4/3, and have less DOF control.

Should I yell "Your are not a pro" when I see them? ^^''

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 16:50 UTC

Dpreview is a niche site and comments are rated and moderated. So it works quite well.

On other sites, comment can be useless or damaging, because they fail their own "noble" and useful mission (to spread ideas and information).

In that cases, they only work as an easy trick to generate "clicks", but in the long run they overshadow the editorial content of the site, and they decrease its "perceived quality" .

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2013 at 10:06 UTC as 131st comment
In reply to:

fibonacci1618: The most important unknown at the moment is the IQ of the lens, although I'm sure the price is going to be too high for many. But it is what it is, i.e. a Leica design, f/1.2 lens. If the price is too high for, then go get the Oly 45 f/1.8. There is now a niche for both types of user, those who are happy with the Oly and its price, and those whose needs (or pockets) justify the Panny 42.5mm.

There's also the Voigtlander 42.5mm f/0.95 to boot.

There's no other lens system in the world that offers such a fantastic range in just this focal length - not even Leica has a Noctilux lens in this 85 to 90mm focal length.

So, I'm just glad m4/3 is maturing nicely. Now, let's see what the price will be.

yabokkie, If I imagine myself using a FF body + an 85 f1.8 in the contexts and ways I used the OMD + the 45mm f1.8, I can't stop laughing.

The 45mm is always with me. I suppose the 85mm for full frame is always at home (or studio)

Also, the "equivalence" works in both ways: 6x the volume (and weight) of camera and lens is worth that half stop of advantage of the 85 on FF?

I agree that if weren't for volume and weight, the "equivalence" would have been a lot easier.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 15, 2013 at 17:07 UTC
On Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 review article (577 comments in total)
In reply to:

rusticus: Let's see if dxo-mark to let the cat out of the bag
and burst the bubble of the most over-rated camera in 2012

It seems that people who are using the OMD are enjoyng it.

What cat should go out of the bag? That OM-D is not a enjoyable camera to use, or that dxomark is read much more than is understood?

Direct link | Posted on May 25, 2012 at 17:00 UTC
Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7