ihkim

ihkim

Lives in United States CO, United States
Has a website at www.mydiyworld.net
Joined on Feb 18, 2008

Comments

Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4
In reply to:

Juraj Lacko: All nice but samsung cameras have had always way too large RAW files. We will see its any better this time. Who wants to deal with 50MB files? Not me. The rest of the system would be ok

Juraj,

No, you have a out-dated information about RAW file size. Since NX300, the RAW file size reduced around 20~24 MB.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 2, 2014 at 21:09 UTC
On Video Interview: Samsung at PPE 2011 article (80 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jorginho: "response is phenomenal"

Now how did this happen all of a sudden. I don't believe a thing, although it is relative.

"First APS-c breaking 20 MPixel barrier"

Did he forget about the NEX7 APS-c which is 24 MP APS-c?

85mm is huge and not unlike some Sony's NEX lenses. At least this one delivers great IQ.

Simply, NEX-7 is not on the market yet.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 11, 2011 at 15:22 UTC
On Just Posted: Samsung NX200 Studio Comparison for JPEG article (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kuturgan: As I see there are a lot of issues and mistakes with NX200 test. We don't know if they were intentional or accidental though.
It's a shame and ridiculous that, considered as a serious digital camera review, Dpreview produces such a mistakes (only!) with Samsung cameras (NX10 and NX200).
Dpreview must make a new and fair test with NX200, and delete erroneous one, and make an official statement about that mistake.

@HowaboutRAW

DPR mentioned they are studio samples and titled "Comparison". What should be based for this kind of comparison? Basic rule for any comparison is put the comparison in same conditions. How can this be titled comparison with unfocused shots with different kind of lenses? All u4/3 uses Olympus 50mm Macro, Pentax K-5 uses Pentax 50mm Macro. Even NX10 and NX100 used Pentax 50mm Macro with NX-K adapter. But, NX200 uses non-macro Pentax lens. Is this comparison for camera or lens, or what?

DPR mentioned they will retest and post samples again. We will see.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 8, 2011 at 04:24 UTC
On Just Posted: Samsung NX200 Studio Comparison for JPEG article (108 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kuturgan: As I see there are a lot of issues and mistakes with NX200 test. We don't know if they were intentional or accidental though.
It's a shame and ridiculous that, considered as a serious digital camera review, Dpreview produces such a mistakes (only!) with Samsung cameras (NX10 and NX200).
Dpreview must make a new and fair test with NX200, and delete erroneous one, and make an official statement about that mistake.

@Jon, Please go to DPR Samsung forum, you will see bunch of specific issues about the test.

Most significant mistake is NX200 samples have focused significantly at front.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2011 at 17:38 UTC
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4