Hugo808

Hugo808

Joined on Nov 12, 2011

Comments

Total: 898, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Flashback: Nice try Fuji, but Panasonic are already talking 8K

I'm going to wait until 24K comes out, then I can by a TV 30 foot wide.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 22:20 UTC
In reply to:

Cihangir Gzey: X-Pro3 with below features will make it a real competitor against anything:
-IBIS (those shakes in the sample videos are unacceptable EVEN for touristic snaps; Sony and Canon-also said to be Olympus and Panasonic - have awesome IBIS)
-4K
-Big battery
YES, Samsung NX1 brought all of them last year :(
P.S. Almost 1500 comments so far. Fuji is a popular brand (I didn't have a failed Fuji; very reliable products).

Fuji have announced that the X-mount is not compatible with IBIS.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 19:08 UTC
In reply to:

Flashback: When asked how many musicians in their band, the reply was 3 and the drummer:-(

Oh, I like a good drummer joke. FDor instance: How do you tell if the stage is level? The drummer is drooling from both sides of his mouth.

And you know what they say: What do Ginger Baker and black coffee have in common?

They both suck without Cream.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 18:45 UTC

It looks really good, the choice of film simulations really appeals, Fuji are really getting this system together now. Just IBIS to go and it'll become one of the big three.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 14:07 UTC as 38th comment
In reply to:

Flashback: When asked how many musicians in their band, the reply was 3 and the drummer:-(

LOL, I thought it was great, but then I am a drummer....

Direct link | Posted on Feb 8, 2016 at 14:05 UTC
On article Framing fashion with Dixie Dixon (32 comments in total)

Very good, nice to see a genuine born photographer and one who enjoys it so much. Her enthusiasm is infectious.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 20:01 UTC as 18th comment

Forever, or at least until the next upgrade....

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2016 at 10:21 UTC as 48th comment | 3 replies
On article Delayed: Nikon Japan pushes D500 to end of April (133 comments in total)

Clearly they read my previous post and decided a pop-up flash would be a good idea after all.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2016 at 18:07 UTC as 34th comment
On article X-Factor: Canon's EOS-1D X Mark II examined in-depth (601 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hugo808: Why does anyone think they need exposure compensation in M mode? Think about it.....

But disabling it seems pedantic.

If I designed a camera it would disable auto ISO when M mode was engaged. old school...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 2, 2016 at 12:17 UTC
On article X-Factor: Canon's EOS-1D X Mark II examined in-depth (601 comments in total)

Why does anyone think they need exposure compensation in M mode? Think about it.....

But disabling it seems pedantic.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 2, 2016 at 11:22 UTC as 82nd comment | 16 replies

Eh, how? Get out and shop you skinflints!

Direct link | Posted on Jan 30, 2016 at 07:14 UTC as 55th comment | 2 replies
On photo St Marija Assunta Mosta Inner Dome in the Defining usable space: Ceilings challenge (4 comments in total)

Wow.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2016 at 20:13 UTC as 2nd comment
In reply to:

Hugo808: Here's my gripe: The new anti-haze tool is only available if you pay the CC subscription of Lightroom and doesn't appear on the desktop version. Grrr.

I think you do care or you wouldn't respond. Be a sucker for manipulative marketing if you like but if Adobe drop the desktop version of Lr they lose me as a customer.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2016 at 20:05 UTC
In reply to:

Hugo808: Here's my gripe: The new anti-haze tool is only available if you pay the CC subscription of Lightroom and doesn't appear on the desktop version. Grrr.

You must revel in being a sucker. Enjoy your gouging at the hands of marketers.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2016 at 18:15 UTC
In reply to:

Hugo808: Here's my gripe: The new anti-haze tool is only available if you pay the CC subscription of Lightroom and doesn't appear on the desktop version. Grrr.

I have paid for it. Duh.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2016 at 21:27 UTC
In reply to:

Hugo808: Here's my gripe: The new anti-haze tool is only available if you pay the CC subscription of Lightroom and doesn't appear on the desktop version. Grrr.

In other words, you can have any colour you like as long as it's black...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2016 at 19:51 UTC
In reply to:

Hugo808: Here's my gripe: The new anti-haze tool is only available if you pay the CC subscription of Lightroom and doesn't appear on the desktop version. Grrr.

You mean a future version like the one that exists now and could get if I paid a bit more but yet still calls itself Lightroom 6.4?

And why is anyone defending their deliberate customer gouging anyway, do you all work for Adobe or something?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2016 at 19:27 UTC
In reply to:

Hugo808: Here's my gripe: The new anti-haze tool is only available if you pay the CC subscription of Lightroom and doesn't appear on the desktop version. Grrr.

Why should they? Because I paid for it! You call it marketing, I call it shameless blackmail to try and persuade me to spend more money than I want to for what is supposed to be the same program. The clue is the name.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2016 at 18:23 UTC

Here's my gripe: The new anti-haze tool is only available if you pay the CC subscription of Lightroom and doesn't appear on the desktop version. Grrr.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 28, 2016 at 16:56 UTC as 17th comment | 31 replies

Couldn't they have done a white lens for the money?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 27, 2016 at 18:53 UTC as 50th comment
Total: 898, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »