Hugo808

Hugo808

Joined on Nov 12, 2011

Comments

Total: 750, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Hugo808: What no OVF? Count me out...

It was just a little joke on the sort of comments you get here pretty regularly. It doesn't matter what some company or other has achieved, somebody will wish it had/did/was something else...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 14:06 UTC

What no OVF? Count me out...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 06:53 UTC as 15th comment | 3 replies
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-3 II article (513 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hugo808: I had a go on a Pentax in a shop and it had really noisy autofocus. That was the end of it for me, but are all their lenses missing the ultrasonics of the competition?

"Try and use a Pentax Limited lens first then come back to us."

What a dumb and irrelevant remark, we are talking about kit lenses putting off customers not what a bunch of expensive primes might do for you.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2015 at 05:15 UTC
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-3 II article (513 comments in total)

I had a go on a Pentax in a shop and it had really noisy autofocus. That was the end of it for me, but are all their lenses missing the ultrasonics of the competition?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 23, 2015 at 13:02 UTC as 46th comment | 13 replies
In reply to:

madeinlisboa: Correct me if I'm wrong. Lightroom still has a huge problem. There is no list of filters applied to images, which means that an user must navigate through radial, gradients, brushes, etc, in order to check which ones were applied to an image.

I've never seen the other method you've used so I cannot say but the "history" tab works for me as not only can I see what I've done but I can undo mistakes easily too (I use that function a lot....)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2015 at 19:24 UTC
In reply to:

madeinlisboa: Correct me if I'm wrong. Lightroom still has a huge problem. There is no list of filters applied to images, which means that an user must navigate through radial, gradients, brushes, etc, in order to check which ones were applied to an image.

There's a history list on the right you can open that shows what you did and in what order. Will that do you?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 21, 2015 at 18:12 UTC
In reply to:

Hugo808: Great to see these photo's. Would love to visit North Korea.

I don't suppose you get much freedom to wander about taking photo's. Escorted everywhere I should think.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 12, 2015 at 15:28 UTC

Great to see these photo's. Would love to visit North Korea.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 12, 2015 at 14:08 UTC as 20th comment | 3 replies

If the camera business fails, these guys could enter politics. I'm not sure they answered a single question adequately!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2015 at 06:28 UTC as 95th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Hugo808: Is it just me or is the D7200 clearly superior to the D750?

But it is slightly better.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2015 at 18:04 UTC
In reply to:

Hugo808: Is it just me or is the D7200 clearly superior to the D750?

Yes, I'll give you that RAW is slightly better than J-Peg.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 9, 2015 at 15:22 UTC
In reply to:

Hugo808: Is it just me or is the D7200 clearly superior to the D750?

You sound like a D750 owner.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2015 at 15:32 UTC

Is it just me or is the D7200 clearly superior to the D750?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2015 at 12:16 UTC as 3rd comment | 8 replies
On Nikon D7200 real-world samples gallery posted article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

intruder61: images that could have been taken by any camera....nothing special.

"images that could have been taken by any camera....nothing special."

Yes, I agree with you that all cameras are equally good these days. The only difference is weight and suitable lenses for what you want to do.

Bravo camera companies for this achievement!

Direct link | Posted on Apr 4, 2015 at 11:26 UTC
On Nikon D7200 real-world samples gallery posted article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

vesa1tahti: Amazing ! I have this combo. Can't wait for the full review.

I'm glad ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 4, 2015 at 11:06 UTC
On Nikon D7200 real-world samples gallery posted article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hugo808: Jolly impressive, but is it the lens or the camera? I'm looking forward to seeing a mix of glass used for the full review...

I imagine the revolutionary design of the Lumix LX100 lens will be adapted for other applications very soon. How small would that make my dream 20-85mm F1.8?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2015 at 07:45 UTC
On DPReview Recommends: Selfie-Sticks article (136 comments in total)

Very good, and all the more gratifying for you I suspect that hardly anyone got it ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2015 at 06:13 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
On Nikon D7200 real-world samples gallery posted article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

John Szeto: Why are the iso 1600 and 3200 sample images so noisy? I would expect better.

24 million pixels on a small sensor will be noisy. You can't beat the laws of physics.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2015 at 05:41 UTC
On Nikon D7200 real-world samples gallery posted article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hugo808: Jolly impressive, but is it the lens or the camera? I'm looking forward to seeing a mix of glass used for the full review...

Pardon me for having an opinion.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2015 at 05:40 UTC
On Nikon D7200 real-world samples gallery posted article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

Hugo808: Jolly impressive, but is it the lens or the camera? I'm looking forward to seeing a mix of glass used for the full review...

I hate to sound churlish but 18-35 seems a bit stingy, 55mm would have been better for me. I'd be changing lenses every five seconds with this...

Direct link | Posted on Apr 1, 2015 at 18:49 UTC
Total: 750, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »