-
-
An enforced Adobe CC subscription is immoral, no question. Over in the Adobe forum, I started a discussion if the immoral may be illegal in some contries, or may become if laws adapt to this...
-
> ADBE will feel NO pressure to enhance their products. And ADBE will feel no pressure to NOT sky-rocket their subscription fee. After all, most other subscription makers do this too. As a...
-
- Adobe Photoshop CC is 300€ per year (ignoring the reduced 1st year rate for upgraders from CS3). I assume PSCC includes PSCS6 Extended. - Adobe Photoshop CS6 (upgrade from CS3) is 230€ (in...
-
- Adobe Photoshop CC is 300€ per year (ignoring the reduced 1st year rate for upgraders from CS3). I assume PSCC includes PSCS6 Extended. - Adobe Photoshop CS6 (upgrade from CS3) is 230€ (in...
-
E.g., you can still apply EV compensation. And the behaviour of iso is independent from the menu configuration for auto iso. Much faster to switch modes.
-
You think like many in China who ripp of all our work. Go, consult China and end your life in poverty.
Of course, don't be surprised if artists stop showing off their work in the web (photos,...
-
Thanks.
Here is a report from wired:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-04/30/orphan-works-copyright
The problem is that party A can strip a photo off its meta data and watermark...
-
Pentax has done it long ago.
They have P Sv Tv Av TAv M on the dial, with TAv for preselecting time and aperture, letting iso float (so, it is the I mode mentioned here).
btw, Sv is the opposite of...
-
You would be correct if the blur from rasterization could be ignored. I ignored it because the two cameras to be discussed had the same #pixels.
In general though, more pixels means better...
-
This is a nice thought experiment, but may not hold true.
To really compare apples to apples, you also need to stop down the D800 at 200mm one stop more than the D7000 at 133mm (at twice the ISO on...
-
MTF is given for a frequency which is usually expressed as lp/mm (line pair per mm) or LW/PH (line widths per picture height).
If given as LW/PH (what DPR does), the same absolute resolution (same...
-
Mark, while you are right that a 14 Bit DAC can make a small difference at low ISO DR, you are wrong when asserting that the sensors are equal except for the DAC. As the 12/14 Bit DACs are...
-
The deep image links are working still. There are no corner crops and a few center crops only. So, the samples have limited use only. A few deep links for you: -...
-
This will be an interesting exercise. Sigma has a 24-70/2.8 for FF too, which actually is quite affordable. Comparing Sigma's MTF curves for both (looked up at Sigma DE) the new Art lens for APS-C...
-
This will be an interesting exercise. Sigma has a 24-70/2.8 for FF too, which actually is quite affordable. Comparing Sigma's MTF curves for both (looked up at Sigma DE) the new Art lens for APS-C...
-
Seriously: none of them.
The RX100 has an F/1.8 lens at 2.7x crop, which equals an F/3.2 aperture on APS-C. So, at 28mm, the APS-C F2.8 cameras only have a minuscule advantage of 0.4 stops. Need...
-
The lens has no II in its name.
-
The "text book" answer is "no", decreasing resolution does not lower iso performance. More specifically, the image with the lower resolution will have less pixel noise which exactly compensates for...
-
Your answer shows I was right. You contribute nothing while at least my comment contained a reference to a source with more info. Forums have focus and I only wanted to help.
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
| Total messages |
409 |
| Threads started |
16 |
| Last post |
1 week ago |
| Entries |
1 |
| Votes cast |
0 |
| Last entry |
Apr 26, 2010 |
| Photos uploaded |
7 |
| Last upload |
Apr 18, 2010 |
falconeyes has not added any dpreview gear yet.
|