karlwunsch: There's a Slavia Prague flag on pic #8. Was it taken at the Slavia Swimming Pool? There used to be a glass wall like that! That's where I learned to swim nearly three decades ago. Boy this brings memories...
Great observation! ;)
Martinka: + for not another landscape photographer- strange mix of different genres
rjx: Well, you just repeated what I said ;)
+ for not another landscape photographer- strange mix of different genres
Roland Karlsson: So, I have read several comments here. If you say it is fantastic and imaginative you get applauded. If you say you do not like it or it that is quite common, then you are jumped at and someone will demand you show your own imaginative work. The thread itself is more interesting than the pictures. Or maybe not, the thread is actually quite predictive.
Now, regarding the images. I think the first is good. It is unexpected. Why both a flame and a scissor? Makes you think.
The rest are cute. Nothing wrong with them. Nothing special either. The light bulb is a good performance though. Nice that he got the reflections correct.
Eric: "I do not like it" is exactly the same useless as "I like it". But for some reason no one ever wanted anyone to explain what do they like about it.
Similar to Foldiohttp://orangemonkie.com/foldio2/
Martinka: So how exactly woudl higher DxO Mark help me to produce better pictures?www.artofsport.cz
I have several 110x70 cm and they look fine. But what do I know, 120x80 would maybe be better with Nikon :)
So how exactly woudl higher DxO Mark help me to produce better pictures?www.artofsport.cz
Martinka: Why do you always stop for a while before taking the shot? This is not a typical usage of AF-C, so this test is more or less useless.
Just tell me when in real situation when shooting moving subject the subjects stops for a half second and let you focus while still? And when subject is not moving, testing AF-C makes no sense.
Why do you always stop for a while before taking the shot? This is not a typical usage of AF-C, so this test is more or less useless.
alouette: although the Swiss Currency is stronger than ever, the official Prices are ridiculous high (up to 20%!) in Switzerland compared to the USA:
Prices excluding VAT:500mm/F4: CHF 11'017 or $ 12'106600mm/F4: CHF 13'146 or $ 14'446
$ to CHF calculated with a quotient of 0.91 which was the rate yesterday morning, before the Swiss National bank started to weaken the CHF due to the upcoming GREXIT...
falconeyes: I am puzzled by the MTF differences of 500E vs. 600E. The 500 looks a lot better. Not sure if this is real. But just in case, I digged further ...
The 600E has a (relatively) larger reduction in weight and a second front lens which is smaller in relation to the first one than the 500E. It looks like the 600E is more compromise between weight and wide open performance than the 500E -- of course both being stellar. But with a TC and high resolution body, could be that the 500E ends up having more reach than the 600E ;)
OTOH, could be that those MTF on Nikon site are artificial and not very meaningful in practice.
Might be the urge to make it lighter than Canon :)
VAT, exchange rate between Yen and CHF...
MTF of 500 mm looks pretty impressive:http://nikonrumors.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Nikon-AF-S-NIKKOR-500MM-F4E-FL-ED-VR-MTF-chart.jpg
Don Sata: In the list you missed a rotary leg die cast aluminum type table tripod like these:
They are super cheap, super resistant and the varying leg angle makes them more useful for tricky surfaces or even for using your own chest as a support.
I use Focus for several years and probably was the first user here in Czech republic. I've tried it with 1D + 300/2.8 lens (about 4 kg total). BUT. Legs need to be completely straight. Surface which the tripod is standing on must be rough, otherwise legs tend to slide to the sides. It's very unstable and flimsy and shaky. With such a load I'd recomment it only in an emergency.
Well, neither do Joby...
biza43: Some nice images, keep up the good work and inspiration.
That said, I would invite people to read this article here:
It makes some very valid points about "too much use" of wide angles in landscape photography. Quite often we include uninteresting and boring foregrounds in our photos, and then the interesting stuff shows up as small and distant.
Totally agreed.And what makes annoys me even more are panoramic shots of mountains with sunlit tops and dramatic sky.
TriezeA72: Give it a few days and a Chinese version will be available on cheapBay!..... for half the price
First version of PocketSkater is on for over a year now and so far no cheap chinese copy at all.
misolo: 35mm-format image circle, 15mm focal length, 1:1 magnification, 12cm minimum focus distance measured from front element -- don't know much about macro but, just from simple geometry, unless there's enormous focus breathing involved surely something's wrong with these specs?
rrcad: as you can see on a sample image (link above), it's not enough ;)
rrccad: Even as a non macro lens, having perspective shift is kind of a nice / big deal - the only other lens around this focal is the much more expensive 17mm TS-E.
On the other hand, Canon has twice as big shift distance (12 mm compared to 6 mm) in any direction (compared to only up/down ofr Laowa)
It sounds good, but 6 mm shift is not much...