peevee1

peevee1

Joined on Mar 28, 2012

Comments

Total: 3226, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On Amazon Fire Phone camera review post (55 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: ISO 40? What kind of sensor do they use for that? Interesting choice of base ISO, probably because the lens has fixed bright aperture.

And what ISO do you use on a sunny day at f/2 without filters, with limited shutter speed?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 11:22 UTC
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1667 comments in total)

Smartphone with FF sensor and EF mount. :)

OK, OK, mirrorless rebel.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 6, 2014 at 15:26 UTC as 708th comment
In reply to:

W5JCK: Netflix should spend the money on acquiring more movies. Ever time I tried to locate a movie I wanted to watch I got the notice that it was only available through their DVD subscription! :\

For $12K, they will not be able to buy even one minute of a movie. :)

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 19:37 UTC
In reply to:

peevee1: Oh come on! What does that have to do with digital photography?

The article is not even about scanners.

It's not like the last camera review was published by DPR about 3 month ago, and the last lens review not parroted from DxO was what, 2 years ago, right? I guess they have no cameras to review, no tests to perform...
If I wanted to see an article about British Imperial War Museum, I would go to a website of British Imperial War Museum, not on a site about digital photography. Here, it is just pollution.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 19:16 UTC

Oh come on! What does that have to do with digital photography?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 11:15 UTC as 15th comment | 10 replies

DPR, enough with the fillers.
The answer to the question is very obvious: because there are no pancake f/1.7-f/2.8 stabilized 27-75mm-eq zooms for GX7, let alone for $100.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 2, 2014 at 02:46 UTC as 109th comment

So, DPP4 still DOES NOT have any new camera support?
Anybody knows what is their problem?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 1, 2014 at 14:01 UTC as 5th comment | 1 reply
On GoPro announces Hero4 lineup article (109 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: A great marketing exercise - how to sell a basic smartphone camera hardware for a lot of money. :-)

"Can your smartphone shoot 1080p120 or 4Kp30? "

iPhone 6 can. Samsung Note 4 can.
But Hero 4 Silver (and simply Hero 4) cannot.

"Does your smartphone come with a case that allows it to shoot video and stills many meters under water "

Does Hero 4 Black COME with that case, or the case is sold separately? ;)

"and makes it tough enough to survive a drop from an airplane?"

I would not count on it. :)

"Is your smartphone under $400 without a contract?"

You own a smartphone anyway. BTW, Hero 4 Black, the only one doing 4k, is NOT under $400 without a contract. But many smartphones now are below $200 without contract. Can your Hero make calls, send e-mail, play games and do everything else the smartphones can?

The fact is, GoPro 4 Black uses the hardware similar to good (but not the best) cameras in smartphones (far from Panasonic CM1 etc). Silver is at best average, and Simply GoPro is like a camera phone from many years ago.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2014 at 21:47 UTC

What's next after Ricoh will make after the Flu card - Tuberculosis card, Ebola card, AIDS card? ;)
Sorry, couldn't resist.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2014 at 21:26 UTC as 9th comment | 1 reply
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II: Real-world samples (beta) article (268 comments in total)

Nothing is moving... I guess the purpose was not to demonstrate the new AF system. How the sensor is compared to 70D or any competitors cannot be determined without controlled comparison anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2014 at 18:26 UTC as 98th comment
On GoPro announces Hero4 lineup article (109 comments in total)

A great marketing exercise - how to sell a basic smartphone camera hardware for a lot of money. :-)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2014 at 18:19 UTC as 38th comment | 5 replies
On GoPro announces Hero4 lineup article (109 comments in total)

"Professional quality video capture at 2.7K30"

Another marketing invention? What is that 2.7K30, something like 1500p30? Or is it 2700 pixel wide, but the same 1080 lines high?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2014 at 18:15 UTC as 39th comment | 7 replies
On Amazon Fire Phone camera review post (55 comments in total)

ISO 40? What kind of sensor do they use for that? Interesting choice of base ISO, probably because the lens has fixed bright aperture.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2014 at 18:08 UTC as 15th comment | 4 replies

Must be very relevant for many on these forums...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2014 at 15:35 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

mchevrier: There is no point in having interchangeable lens if no other lens match the color of your camera ;-)

It's yellowish, not snow-white like this one.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2014 at 15:27 UTC

"leather alternative material"

and a good-alternative camera inside. :-)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2014 at 15:26 UTC as 60th comment | 1 reply
On Sony shows off upcoming full-frame lenses at Photokina article (328 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: Still don't have 85mm or pro zooms, yet making ANOTHER 35mm.
And if their 35/2.8 is ridiculously overpriced at $800, I hate to think how much they would ask for 4 times more light.

Maybe you had a bad sample. "To say it should cost $200" is simply to say that it shouldn't cost more than similarly performing competition. You just don't price 35mm f/2.8 lens like the best 35mm f/1.4 lens on the market, and if you do, it is at least 4 times overpriced collecting 4 times less light and being less sharp etc.

Sony clearly went Gillette model with it's ILC lines - releasing reasonably priced cameras, while overpricing lenses and accessories tremendously (not just lenses, how about $600 VDA-V1K OVF or $450 EVF similar in spec to $89 and $200 Olympus OVF and EVF?)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2014 at 12:50 UTC
On Sony shows off upcoming full-frame lenses at Photokina article (328 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: Still don't have 85mm or pro zooms, yet making ANOTHER 35mm.
And if their 35/2.8 is ridiculously overpriced at $800, I hate to think how much they would ask for 4 times more light.

It is sharper than Sony 35/2.8, probert500. I have seen the tests. You can see them yourself, on slrgear for example.
Yes, the Sony is overpriced by the factor of 4 at least.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2014 at 01:32 UTC
On Sony shows off upcoming full-frame lenses at Photokina article (328 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: Still don't have 85mm or pro zooms, yet making ANOTHER 35mm.
And if their 35/2.8 is ridiculously overpriced at $800, I hate to think how much they would ask for 4 times more light.

Bargain? Comparable Canon 40/2.8 STM is actually smaller, sharper, and 4 times cheaper! Only mentality completely consumed by Sony's advertisement might consider the product overpriced by at least a factor of 4 as a bargain!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 26, 2014 at 21:37 UTC
On Zeiss introduces Distagon T* 35mm F1.4 ZM lens article (58 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: "professional reportage photography"

Muahahahahaha!

Are they still in the 50s? ;) Who does "professional reportage photography" with MF lenses?!

I wonder what photography is done without eyes? ;-)

Reportage is a job of a reporter (="journalist").
Leica M is a toy for rich people.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2014 at 20:32 UTC
Total: 3226, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »