Archiver

Archiver

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Feb 24, 2005

Comments

Total: 161, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Photokina 2014: Hands-on with RED's Epic Dragon article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

ecube: I suspect this is strictly for high-speed, high image quality commercial / scientific / industrial application. I am sure it is an excellent piece of equipment that is well beyond what I could afford or will ever need. For those reasons, I'll skip reading the article.

@ecube - I am sorry.

I'm sorry to have taken some of the precious moments of your life with my unnecessary advice.

I'm sorry for the vicissitudes of life that have caused you to be so touchy. I'm sorry you were unhappy as a child, modest at work, and never truly achieved the success you saw others gain.

I'm sorry that you feel the years passing faster and faster. I'm sorry that you feel the insecure need to parade your range of interests to a stranger on the internet, and that your pride won't allow you to see that for what it really is.

I'm sorry that someone can read so much and yet apparently understand so little. Particularly of patience, forbearance, and humility. But such cannot be learned from reading.

I'm sorry if this incenses you. But if you are twice as old as me, then the nurse will soon be there for your weekly sponge bath, and all of this will disappear in her tender, practiced hands.

And for that, I am sorry.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2014 at 04:22 UTC
On Photokina 2014: Hands-on with RED's Epic Dragon article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I didn't see a cost on this bad boy.

$50k+, depending on the rig you choose.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2014 at 03:57 UTC
On Photokina 2014: Hands-on with Leica X and X-E article (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

arndsan: ... but the lens looks soo plastic !

Only in those pictures. The lens is made of metal.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 03:47 UTC
On Photokina 2014: Hands-on with RED's Epic Dragon article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

ecube: I suspect this is strictly for high-speed, high image quality commercial / scientific / industrial application. I am sure it is an excellent piece of equipment that is well beyond what I could afford or will ever need. For those reasons, I'll skip reading the article.

Well, you could always read it for interest's sake. After all, you probably read many news articles about things that have no bearing on you or your interests, but the information is interesting all the same.

The Red Epic Dragon is a professional digital cinema camera used in big budget Hollywood movies, high end TV and cinema commercials, and similar levels of production. Definitely not the usual camera that the average DPReview reader concerns themselves with.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 03:37 UTC
On Photokina 2014: Hands-on with RED's Epic Dragon article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

Bernard Carns: The problem with grabbing still frames from a video camera is the lack of pixels in the vertical dimension.

It's like having a 100MP camera that is 1 pixel high.

Its all panorama.

Not exactly. The aspect ratio is 16:9 and a single raw frame is 6mp.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 03:33 UTC
On Photokina 2014: Hands-on with RED's Epic Dragon article (50 comments in total)
In reply to:

mosc: 19mp from an EF lens WITH WHAT CROP? Seems like critical information. How big a sensor are we talking about here?

The Red Epic sensor is Super 35 in film terms, which is equivalent to aps-c in digital photography land.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2014 at 03:32 UTC
In reply to:

Randy Benter: Does the lens have filter threads?

What is the estimated release date?

The X 113 is in Leica boutiques and dealers right now. On the LUF someone just called their dealer and it should be with delivered before the weekend!

The lens does have filter threads, although the diameter is unknown at this time.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 05:16 UTC
In reply to:

Ben O Connor: İts like rolex watch. Surely there are multi functional army watches by far better priced from Casio
Or there are thousand other car brands. No need the drive Rolls-Royce ...

IT - IS - A -UNIQUE - LUXURY- ITEM !!!

I also don't see ANY logic to buy something exact same than Panasonic models. But this one is UNIQUE !

This camera is not a rebadged Panasonic like the D-Lux, the X 113 is an entirely Leica product.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 04:27 UTC
In reply to:

stevens37y: It is exacly the same as the Panasonic LX100:
+ red dot sticked
- grip not sticked (probably you can buy it for extra $$$)

extra Lightroom is only $139

No, Panasonic doesn't use DNG. I have three recent Panasonics and they all write to Panasonic's proprietary rw2 files. It's doubtful that the LX100 now uses DNG.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 04:25 UTC
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: This camera is so good it is even worth Leica prices. If Panasonic charged Leica prices for the LX100 people would still buy it. Just wait till all of the LX100s sell out instantly. The Leica option will start to become more appealing instead of a 3 month wait for the back ordered LX100s.

That's not a bad point, but I wonder just how popular the Pana will be in the grander scheme of camera sales. On DPR you'll see lots of people placing preorders and rushing to the stores, but is that reflected in the larger camera buying public? Will the LX100 really be in such demand that supply is limited for the first several months?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2014 at 04:23 UTC
In reply to:

Just another Canon shooter: I would rather buy the EOS M +22/2 and pocket $2K.

Of course you would. You're just another Canon shooter.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 04:34 UTC

It will be interesting to see how the price gap changes over time. The Leica will probably stay close to retail for longer than the Panasonic, although demand for the Pana may keep prices up for longer than usual. Even though the LX7 was sold at deep discounts not too long after being released, I don't think the same will happen with the LX100.

Nevertheless, the Pana will most likely drop in price sooner, and by a greater amount, than the Leica. Then we'll see how much Lightroom, a three year warranty, and Leica styling are worth by comparison.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 04:07 UTC as 48th comment
On Photokina 2014: Hands-on with the Fujifilm X100T article (91 comments in total)
In reply to:

Valiant Thor: Ken Rockwell says it's the best compact camera ever! Weeeee . . .

Rockwell doesn't review cameras. He blesses them, and they break all sales records and pass gracefully into photographic history, while still commanding exorbitant resale prices. Such is the power of the mighty Rockwell.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 02:02 UTC
In reply to:

Peiasdf: You can get an used RX1 for this price and that's FF + Zeiss f/2.0.

Your implied message is that the Zeiss lenses are better than Leica. Zeiss lenses are excellent, but the equivalent Leica lenses usually perform better. It remains to be seen how the X lens does, though.

The X uses the same body as the X Vario, which handles beautifully and feels great in the hand. The RX1 feels weirdly unbalanced by comparison, unless you add a grip.

I agree that a used RX1 seems like better value, but haptics and ergonomics play a large part in how you bond with a camera.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 01:57 UTC
In reply to:

kwa_photo: Hmmm....the rebranding continues. At least the rebranding isn't as crazy as what Hassy does :-) This one does have a nice overall look to it. Ergonomically, the LX100 looks nicer. Is it worth the premium? Who knows.

The Hassy rebranding is atrocious. As for value, it depends on who is buying, and for what purpose. It's 'only' $300 more than the LX100, but you get a free copy of Lightroom, a three year warranty, Leica cosmetic looks and somewhat better resale value. I don't see any direct photographic advantages, though.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 01:49 UTC
In reply to:

yonsarh: does this camera has different image processer than LX100 ?

Most likely not. The Panasonic rebadges have always been essentially Panasonic hardware inside with Leica cosmetic styling, as well as Leica-style menus and jpeg processing. The hardware itself is the same.

If you're looking for a camera with a processor unique to Leica, you'd need to examine the X, X-E, and X Vario.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 01:46 UTC
On DPReview in Cologne: We're at Photokina! article (15 comments in total)

Have a great time, folks!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 08:20 UTC as 11th comment

The original 14/2.5 is a surprisingly good lens, and makes the GM1 a very compact and discreet street camera. Refreshing the design really ought to be accompanied by performance increases, but we can't have everything. Panasonic are busily creating cameras that have industry-leading 4K video and groundbreaking fixed-lens cameras, so we can't complain too much.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 08:13 UTC as 6th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1864 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jacques Cornell: I'm wondering why they went with an m43 sensor rather than the very nice 1" sensor found in the FZ1000. The latter would have matched the FZ1000 and allowed a larger aperture and/or longer zoom range in a same-size package.

Because they gain better image quality and allow for multi-aspect ratio shooting.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 00:44 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1864 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: The most important thing to remember about the LX100 is not just that it has a bigger sensor but it also has larger pixels. Most companies are cramming 20+ megapixels into their 1 inch sensors. This 4/3 of an inch sensor only has 17 megapixels.

The low light capabilities of this camera should be outstanding.

I agree that the low light capabilities should be excellent, but not considerably better than a 16mp m43 body. We're talking about a 16+mp 4/3 sensor which is fairly standard, not a huge pixel anomaly like the Sony A7s 12mp full frame sensor.

At best, the low light capabilities will be like a GM1 or GH4 with a f1.7 lens. Maybe a bit better if they improve the processor.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 23:46 UTC
Total: 161, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »