JacobSR

JacobSR

Lives in United States CA, United States
Joined on Sep 13, 2006

Comments

Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On Ricoh expands Q series with Pentax Q-S1 article (350 comments in total)
In reply to:

locke_fc: Sorry, but a 1/1.7" sensor is no longer acceptable. Might as well use your smartphone instead.

Exactly, there are some guys who buy what they want, and there are others who buy what dpr want.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2014 at 05:49 UTC
On Ricoh expands Q series with Pentax Q-S1 article (350 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ben O Connor: Just checked there is a Bell & Howel C mount lens which is 100mm F 4.5... It mist be equal to 465mm !!!!! And F 4.5 !!! Very tiny was to carry!!!!

Look what some people do to the Q, must see:
https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3865/14383614397_2f3723360c_c.jpg

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2014 at 00:10 UTC
On Ricoh expands Q series with Pentax Q-S1 article (350 comments in total)
In reply to:

viking79: The Q is fine, and the sensor is actually pretty good, but still missing a model with a viewfinder and flip screen... Using the camera in bright light is a chore. This class of camera should also have good sharing options, WiFi, NFC, etc. The NX Mini is more appealing to me, but the Q does have a nicer selection of lenses available.

Eric

Just don't wear a white shirt.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 5, 2014 at 23:46 UTC
On Ricoh expands Q series with Pentax Q-S1 article (350 comments in total)
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: I hope next model will have 1" sensor and fixed lens...

But it's not how big it is, it's how you use it :)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 5, 2014 at 20:15 UTC
On Ricoh expands Q series with Pentax Q-S1 article (350 comments in total)
In reply to:

locke_fc: Sorry, but a 1/1.7" sensor is no longer acceptable. Might as well use your smartphone instead.

It's not only the sensor size. It's the QUALITY of the sensor, the processing engine, and the quality of the optics. In a compact body with great ergnomics and the proper controls under your fingertips.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 5, 2014 at 19:35 UTC
On Mountain Magic: Shooting in the Lofoten Islands article (68 comments in total)

Great photos but some have no balance. The way I see it this is heavily focused on the forground. Vertical shots that shows depth but the forground taking most of the space that it ruins the backround. Some the backround is so beatifull but it is too distant and is lost: ( 2, 3, 4, 9, 14). The rest are fantastic. Just my 2c.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 18, 2014 at 06:34 UTC as 17th comment | 1 reply
On Little beauty: Nordin Seruyan's macro images article (352 comments in total)

I like #10, the rest is way to busy and too much clutter.

Direct link | Posted on May 11, 2014 at 01:04 UTC as 66th comment
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (485 comments in total)
In reply to:

Valeriu 64: Congratulation Ricoh, and team Ricoh - Pentax for your succes.
Pentax K-3 is the best APS-C DSRL at this moment .

God , bless you

Valeriu

Sure, and you guys have tested both.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 13, 2014 at 07:06 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (485 comments in total)
In reply to:

Retzius: I can't believe you ended the review with this:

"It's not a camera to change systems for, but it's well worth upgrading to, and good enough to make the Pentax system worth considering if you have no existing commitments."

In effect, you are bluntly saying "don't buy this camera if you are a Nikon or Canon user."

Nikon and Canon will be happy now :)

Yeah, well I'm sure if this was a Nikon or Canon reveiw, one's would never find such a comment.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 20:35 UTC
On Pentax K-3 preview (961 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marcin Mo111347cicki: I'm torn between my love for Pentax and hate for Ricoh for what it did. Reduce Pentax to the level of Lumix or Cybershot? Really? I guess I'm not the only one...

Ricoh did not buy Pentax to save it. Ricoh recongnised Pentax as a great brand, and the price was right.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2013 at 23:44 UTC
In reply to:

kai liu: many times, lens is way more important than body. I used to use pentax for 2 years. then I switched to canon 7d. Canon just have so much more lens choice. Pentax lens selection is really limited. And their lens quality are behind canon lens. When I see k-3, it sure looking amazing, but then I think about those pentax lens I have used, I lost interest. I think pentax's priority is to update their lens. They have not announce some high quality lens for many years.(except that 560mm) but look at canon they keep making new lens and update old lens with better optical.

Which lens that you really need that Pentax or a 3rd party lens maker don't have?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2013 at 23:11 UTC
On First Impressions Review: Using the Canon PowerShot G16 article (351 comments in total)
In reply to:

Musicjohn: The G serie powershots have always been way too overpriced rubbish, are still way overpriced rubbish and always will be way overpriced rubbish. There are many other (even cheaper) cams of this format which make just as good a picture, if not better.

I am a professional photographer with 1D-mkIV and 5D-mkII and I have always had the need for a 'pocket sized' little cam which I can have with me all of the time. I have had several G-series from Canon, but always sold them again within a few weeks because I was disappointed with the image quality. About 4 years ago I even preferred a Casio Exilim to the G11.

The reason why people would buy a pocket sized cam is the need to get any picture as fast as possible onto a blog or a newspaper or news website. Considering the resolution size in which the final picture will appear (usually no larger than 600 pixels max.) one could argue that ANY compact camera would fulfill that job, even the lowest price compact cam available today.

Why thx1138? Was that your favorite movie or something?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 27, 2013 at 02:41 UTC
In reply to:

forpetessake: "Low-light performance is bolstered by a blazing fast f/2.0-4.0 glass lens" -- an advanced advertising method known as bold lies. Who would ever call f/9.3-f/18.6 FF zoom blazing fast? Blazing slow is a better description.

It's a DOF equivlent of f/9.3-f/18.6 FF and not in exposure value. Otherwise you would have to use a flash most of the time. F2.0 EV should be all the same.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 5, 2013 at 19:32 UTC
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: They say that Image Stabilization is ideal for "zoom photos of children playing or competing in sporting events."

That is an out right lie. Image stabilization does nothing for moving subjects. It only helps if the camera is shaking and the subject is stationary.

Companies have misled consumers for too long. It is time that it stopped. I hope that Dpreview will call them out on this one day.

In low light situations without using flash, image stabilization is helpful whether the subject is moving or not.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 8, 2013 at 18:32 UTC
On Beautiful country sunset in the Sunset in the countryside V challenge (9 comments in total)

Beautiful scene. I was wondering if you use artificial lighting, the rocks and the grass in the foreground are nicely exposed.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 18, 2013 at 06:07 UTC as 1st comment | 6 replies
On Just Posted: Pentax Q7 Real-world Samples Gallery article (136 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: Pentax was smart to increase the sensor size for the Q7.

They made it large enough to create a much better alternative to any fixed lens 1/1.7" compact, while keeping it small enough to make all the original lenses still work perfectly. And the net result is you end up with a very nice camera that is capable of really good results.

But if you think this camera can compete with and EPM2, then you are being delusional. You cannot repeal the laws of physics just because you like a camera. A 4/3 sensor is still five times larger, and that is just a simple fact.

This difference is even greater than the difference between a 4/3 sensor and a FF sensor, and you don't see anyone saying that an EPM2 can do "nearly as well" as a Nikon D800. Those sort of wild claims are the mark of fanboyism.

However, it still is worth noting that this Pentax Q7 is still a lot more desirable than any Panasonic LX7, Canon S110, or Olympus XZ-2, simply for the feature set and the ability to swap lenses.

Is bigger sensor ALWAYS better? Well, size does matter but sometimes it's not only the size of the sensor. It's the QUALITY of the sensor, with great processing engine, and fine optics.
All that enclosed in a compact body with great ergonomics, and the right controls under your fingertips.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 4, 2013 at 05:25 UTC
On Just posted: Pentax MX-1 review article (101 comments in total)
In reply to:

rb59020: Ordered mine in black from B&H this afternoon as it is @ $399.00

From the artical:
■Excellent image quality in JPEG and Raw
■Fast autofocus
■10fps full-res burst mode
■1cm Macro mode allows extreme closeups
■Raw files contain a lot of extra detail in both highlights and shadows
■Dedicated Movie record button
■Built-in sensor-shift and pixel-track shake reduction

But still just a "74"?

Must of been the missing hot shoe. :-(

With a bright F1.8-2.5 lens and great hi ISO quality you probably don't need a hot shoe. On this type of a camera how often will be used?
I never used external flash on compacts. For me, natural light is best.
But there is a built in flash, if need be, it can be used as trigger for external remote flash.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 05:42 UTC
On Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM Preview preview (352 comments in total)
In reply to:

Beat Traveller: Brace yourself... the 'equivalent aperture' posts are coming.

Just like shutter speeds are the same speed on FF or on APSc cameras. So are all the shutter speeds on all formats.
Aperture readings are also the same in FF or APSC or all the other formats. This is standard, Every lens or camera manufacture have to ubide by these rules.
So f1.8 (FF lens) on FF sensor is the same f1.8 (APSc lens) on APSc sensor. Yes the f1.8 FF lens aperture pupil has to be bigger to cover the the larger format but the exposure should read the same. The only difference is the field of view. Depth of field might look like f2.8 on FF.
ISO (wich is also is standard) and the light propertys is another matter due to sensor technology, processor technology, SNR, size of format, size of pixels, numbers of pixels, density of pixels and the rest of the process. It varies from camera to camera.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2013 at 20:42 UTC
On Review in progress: Pentax K-5 II and K-5 II S article (42 comments in total)
In reply to:

mmitch: Pentax needs to catch up to the rest of the Camera Companies and release a Full Frame body! I really got tired of waiting and switched to Nikon. I owned a K5 it's a great camera, but it's limited lens selection and lack of interest by Pentax to further the company along I can no longer support.

MMitch:
On your 2nd comment many would disagree with you. Here is a professional photographer who claim there is no difference in image quality between K5IIs and 5D Mark III when printed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jH3WevFWbzw&list=UUnGQjVXHOC7lGSr3R9wxuaw&index=3

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2013 at 18:58 UTC
On Review in Progress: Pentax K-5 II and K-5 II S article (70 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pete: I agree with previous posts re: FF/BF issues. In certain situations, the K-5 struggles. Even, in some cases, in the same light, but if one person is more tan than another. I see some this in stage-lighting situations. If the II series addresses that, in all honesty, that would be a phenomenal camera. That occasional issue is my main gripe with the K-5.

On the K5 some claim that if you turn the shake reduction off you get much improved AF speed. Use SR only when needed.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2013 at 18:21 UTC
Total: 41, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »