Jorginho

Jorginho

Lives in Netherlands Netherlands
Joined on May 10, 2008

Jorginho's recent activity

  • With internal I mean: there is a crowd that does want a Panny, but not at the price and size of the GH4 and not with the specs (IQ especially) of the GH2 External: if you are not going to sell a ...
  • So impossible. Only GX7 and onwars can do that. So no. Agreed on it not being m43. Articulated would be nice etc. A new version is Always already on some drawingboard...
  • It went face down with no lens on it in a pile of powdersnow. I turned it of. Later that day went home. Put it on the central heating. It started to function like it should! Okey. Of course it was ...
  • It is just a smal evolution on a dead-end road. People, massively, are taking pics. More than ever. We all know that this is caused by cellphones that can take reasonable pics. Still....cam ...
  • 9 months ago I argued with him about th fact that Oly an Panny (and others) should look at larger sensors. May be a tweeny 600 mm2 sensor. May be a modular design that means body, sensor unit with ...
  • Just yuck. Meto..metoo..metoo and tht is it. That is nt to say (all) their products are bad. I hate their approach. Nver saw a single product by them that seemed to be inspired by someone with ...
  • Samsung is so unimaginative that it does not even know how to copy a good product well. That stupid, big, clunky, lowbuffered piece of ...... does not even have an EVF. It lacks good manual ...
  • To my mind there is no small cam that can deliver a good zoom range and shoot nie indoor pics. The 1 sensors are just no good at high ISO. m43s is, but LX100 whihc is also good at tracking ...
  • Replied in Easy one!
    Nikon1 has much better C-AF. It also has a great plus for current Nikon DSLR users with their adapter. Al te rest is in favour of the Oly. Much better IQ, it has an EvF built in, it has IBIS, it ...
  • On paper the Samsung looks really nice. But that is currently it. Compared to mFT a problem may be the the lenses are simply huge when it comes to the topline of theirs. Quite a few mFT ...
  • Truely pocketable. Sensorperformance equal to GM5. BBuilt in EVF.....Seems like a good option? Any reason why you would not take that one?Also: lX100 is not  mFT cam. The sensor is not used fully ...
  • Replied in nonsense.
    Don't believe it. If so: foolish. This is not Panny/Oly market so there is no luxury to split it. If so, ou get two seperate systems moreless and an easily lose your cusomer to a brand that just ...
  • far from perfect to me.....The more I look at it the more I see the same thing time and time again. Stopping the f2.8 mm at 100mm gets us into trouble because to be sensible we now need 100-250 mm. ...
  • I understand your wish all too well! The 90-250 2.8 is 2,6 Kg I think. The one you propose will be easily 1 Kg or more. 250/3,5 = 72 mm diameter glass only. That will be tha absolute min. The lens ...
  • Personally I'll never buy them....I am principaly agains porting an aps-c lns to the mft platform by only changing te mount...
  • Replied in Huge and heavy
    and no zoom range....A 700 gram 100-250 lens is needed. With better IQ than the 100-300 panny and also much faster c-af. Now a 1.4 or/and 2.0 TC for that would be very nice. Most of all if such a ...
  • I mean that is large and heavy in all likelihood...How huge do you want it to get??
  • No more sub-100 please for the time being!!!! n
  • Also we know very little about its performance. We do know it is a smaller sensor so less IQ can be expected too as compared to GX7 etc...
  • Look at the 4/3 12-35 f2 to get a clue...There is no real market for it I think...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
Total messages 7032
Threads started 147
Last post 1 hour ago
Total comments 274
Total likes 611
Last post 3 days ago
Total reviews 1
Last review 9 months ago
Entries 44
Votes cast 539
Last entry 11 months ago
Photos uploaded 659
Last upload Jul 20, 2010