PIX 2015


Lives in United States United States
Joined on Feb 19, 2011


Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11

also here's a screenshot from next season's "The Walking Dead".

Direct link | Posted on May 3, 2015 at 08:10 UTC as 95th comment
In reply to:

Lebkuchen: Taking pictures of dead people and making money out of it... it's disgusting

Yes, we should suppress all images of death and only look at photos of Rodeo Drive.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 29, 2015 at 08:49 UTC
In reply to:

david kohn: went on Adobe's site to buy update LR5 to LR6. Could not find it anywhere. Went to their chat help and they wasted my time asking me irrelevant questions and finally giving me another bad link. Shame on them!

They've done a good job of hiding the upgrade.

You need to add the full product to your shopping cart. Then go into the cart and click "edit" on the item (that is, edit the full Lightroom 6).

After hitting edit you will see a drop down menu that says "Full". Click on this and select "Upgrade". Then you have to select from a separate drop down menu which version of Lightroom you are upgrading from.

Finally you need to hit SAVE CHANGES at the bottom of the page to save your change to the shopping cart.

Then you are ready to go.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2015 at 20:46 UTC
On Is this the new Leica 'Mini M'? article (369 comments in total)

Maybe it will squirt water like a clown camera.

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2013 at 22:46 UTC as 117th comment

If they could bundle this with match.com into an image editing/dating service I might bite.

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 06:07 UTC as 604th comment
In reply to:

javidog: No fancy studio (justa bathroom) no fancy camera (justa phone) no fancy lighting. Great pics!! Still love me some Stieglitz and Walker Evans but Good job Nick. Mobile photos are here to stay. The only thing fading into obscurity are the cranky old dinosaurs who used to work in darkrooms.

I guess I am a cranky old dinosaur since I used to work in a darkroom.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 3, 2013 at 02:42 UTC

I don't understand, if they are going to continue making 35mm motion picture film, why they can't sell the exact same film stocks packaged for 35mm SLR cameras. If demand is too low to support a national distribution network, sell it directly to photographers over the internet.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 25, 2012 at 05:13 UTC as 50th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Alan Brown: was it a Billion dollars to send this to Mars? (vaguely remember this figure in a news broadcast.. might be a whole lot more. )

Great inovations and technical skills to get it there .. no doubt abut that. But you can't walk here on Earth in the daytime and feel 100% safe.

begs the question....

next time we'll ask them to spend some of the money to exterminate pumas and lions so you'll feel 100% safe walking here on Earth.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 8, 2012 at 10:04 UTC
On Pentax reveals K lens roadmap for 2012 and 2013 article (101 comments in total)
In reply to:

Reg Natarajan: What's the difference between the orange, green and purple coding?

Orange are DA* lenses (high quality, SDM focusing, weathersealed), purple are FA lenses (full-frame, 35mm film compatible), and green are the rest.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 06:49 UTC
On Pentax reveals K lens roadmap for 2012 and 2013 article (101 comments in total)
In reply to:

umbalito: DA Limited Zoom??!! DA Limited Zoom! DA Limited Zoom!

Not quite sure what to make of the DA* ultra zoom either. From the markings on the chart, it almost looks like a 24-80. Pretty useless for APS-C. I doubt they can make an 18-200 f/2.8? Unless they're turning the DA* nomenclature to mean weather-sealed only, and no longer constant aperture and weather-sealed.

Of course they aren't going to make a /2.8 18-200mm zoom. The chart makes it look as if the DA* is going to be about a 17-83mm, a very useful range on APS-C indeed. I wonder how you conclude a 24mm wide angle from that chart, where the bar clearly goes well below 20mm.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2012 at 04:39 UTC
In reply to:

tkbslc: I get the feeling that people think Ricoh is just some rinky-dink niche camera maker. That is not true at all. Consider that they made $740 million in profits last year on $20 billion in sales and are expecting to triple profits by 2014.

Which is why they bought Pentax, onlooker: to have somewhere to invest their profits made elsewhere in order grow the camera side of their business. And now that they own Pentax, they are certainly much more than a "footnote" in the DSLR market.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 6, 2011 at 01:52 UTC
Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11