jm67

From the viewpoint of a wedding photographer...
Yes I know it doesn't quite fit all five #s two and four do so frequently.

'It will mean great exposure for you.'
--No, it won't. I'm on the wrong...

From the viewpoint of a wedding photographer...
Yes I know it doesn't quite fit all five but #s two and four do so frequently.

'It will mean great exposure for you.'
--No, it won't. I'm on the...

How can it be both a "misstatement" and "out of context"? You've either slipped up and said something you shouldn't have or you have said something that has been snipped and is only part of a...

Cordellwillis...no offense to anyone shooting anything other than the latest and greatest. It's just that the newest cameras have different AF systems and how this lens works with them is of...

I'm still using 24-70 ver.1 and have been awaiting comparisons of ver.1,2 and this lens. I'm getting to the point I would like VC even in this range at the end of a long day and had high hopes for...

I would hope that most if not all users of one or the other have caught on to this but it is worthwhile to emphasize the fact. Lightroom has equals (some may say betters) while Photoshop has pale...

"it makes little difference as it is a business expense."

That's a standard response I've seen in a lot of forums that I take offense at. A lot of people, Adobe included, seem to think that...

Gary....I was being generous and including 4.3+4+10.7 and rounding it up to 20. I give Adobe the benefit of the doubt. Even at 20%, it does not bode well for them.

In any case, anyone looking...

Gary....I was being generous and including 4.3+4+10.7 and rounding it up to 20. I give Adobe the benefit of the doubt. Everyone will interpret the results differently but to me I'll call it at...

People are still posting here? Even I have realized that by now, Adobe just does not care. Everyone will interpret the poll differently but I see it as at best, 1 out of 5 thinks Adobe's move is...

People are still posting here? Even I have realized that by now, Adobe just does not care. Everyone will interpret the poll differently but I see it as at best, 1 out of 5 thinks Adobe's move is...

The blame for your situation lies with you AND the photographer.  Unless I'm taking photos casually for friends, of them, with them, I always, always have a contract signed before taking a shot.  I...

Yes, it is. Once you own it, you own it. I currently "own" (license) CS6. You can use it over and over. Once you rent it, you never own it. One day the owner will call you and ask for it back,...

Umm, yes I know. It's how I (we) make money. However, once you have a print, you have it. You can frame it, you can put in into an album, you can make a mouse pad out of it or whatever your...

I WISH I could charge my customers like this. "If you want to keep looking at your photos, pay me $20 a month for life". Stop paying and you can't see them. Sweet. The reality is of course, I...

"Some perspective?
$10/month for the first year = $120
$20/month for the second year = $240
$20/month for the third year = $240
Total cost for 3 years = $600
CS6 $600
And there is no upgrade cost...

"Seriously.
Adobe is not a non-profit.
Adobe is not a charity.
Adobe does not owe you anything.
They are in business to make money. Software piracy costs them millions of dollars a year. This goes...

I completely agree with you on this, Guidenet.
One possible option is to find an alternative converter, e.g. DXO that renders to your taste and send the resulting tiff to photoshop for further...

Can we please pick more than one? The first two are my main irritants though the third, oddly, comes in third for me.

Regardless, whatever we the users say, write, feel, Adobe knows they have a...

"If Adobe really want to charge people for new features, why not add the option to allow us to pay for future ACR updates? I'm perfectly happy with everything in Photoshop CS6, so for me ACR is the...