dylanbarnhart

dylanbarnhart

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Apr 14, 2005
About me:

--Cameras:
Canon 50D
Canon Powershot G2 (modified for infrared)
Panasonic LX7

--Old Cameras: Canon 20D, 350D, 300D, Fuji F30, Powershot Pro1, Minolta
Dimage Z1, Konica Minolta Maxxum 5 (35mm film SLR)

--Lenses:
Canon 70-200mm F2.8 IS
Canon 17-55mm F2.8 IS
Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 APO
Canon 10-22mm F3.5-4.5
Canon 85mm f1.8
Canon 17-85mm F4-5.6
Tamron 70-210mm F2.8
Tamron 28-75mm F2.8
Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 APO
Canon 50mm F1.8
Canon 18-55mm F3.5-5.6
Minolta 35-80mm F4-5.6
Tamron 1.4X Teleconverter
Sigma 50mm F1.4

--Flashes:
Canon 550EX
Sigma EF 500 DG Super
Sunpak super 383
Minolta 3600HS
FlashPoint II 320M

--Accessories and Lighting:
CyberSync flash trigger
Photoflex LiteDome Q39 X-Small softbox
Adorama Boom Arm & Light Stand
FlashPoint 4'x3' softbox & egg crate grid
Sunpak DIGIPRO tripod
Ebay (jiakgong) wireless shutter release
La Crosse bc-700 charger
Ebay (gadgetinfinity) wireless flash trigger
Canon SHOE CORD 2
Photoflex 30 umbrella
Bogen Manfrotto Mini Boom Arm
Impact SUPER CLAMP
Photoflex UMBRELLA SHOE MOUNT MULTI CLAMP
Stroboframe VH 2000 Stroboflip flash bracket
Cokin ND Grad filter

Comments

Total: 162, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On HTC introduces the RE digital camera article (101 comments in total)
In reply to:

dylanbarnhart: What really matters in a picture is the content. Seeing the face expression of someone you know doing something crazy is more interesting than looking at another pixel-perfect postcard-wannabee landscape.

The difference between an action cam and a camera/iPhone:

. Taking a shot doesn't interrupt the "moment", because there's no rear LCD or viewfinder to divert attention to.

. The RE can be clipped onto clothes. See it the clip here http://liliputing.com/2014/09/htc-could-launch-a-re-camera-in-october.html.

. Photo can be taken remotely by someone else via a phone app, but the perspective is up-close. For example, clip it onto one player in a team sport.

. Ultrawide angle on the RE is much wider than most phones and cameras. That way the shot feels more close and more real. The wide angle also makes it easy to compose (everything is in the frame) and focus (probably focus free).

. The photographer is part of the action, not a distant observer. This allows the face expression and the action to be natural. People tend to pose in front of a camera.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 11, 2014 at 00:10 UTC
On HTC introduces the RE digital camera article (101 comments in total)

What really matters in a picture is the content. Seeing the face expression of someone you know doing something crazy is more interesting than looking at another pixel-perfect postcard-wannabee landscape.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2014 at 23:59 UTC as 30th comment | 3 replies

The comparison picture is a big lie. It should mount the 12-35mm X Vario F2.8 on the GX7 instead of that prime pancake lens. Then the size difference will be obvious.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 1, 2014 at 17:23 UTC as 166th comment | 1 reply
On 7DII_beta_ISO12800_030A9238 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

Nice shot. The dynamic range here must be over 15 stops.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2014 at 19:53 UTC as 4th comment
In reply to:

Cipher: I think people with drones and other RC hobbiests might like these cameras. What Sony really needs to do is provide an API to allow people to write their own apps to control the camera. That would open up many other possible uses for this camera.

There was already an API released together with the last QX10/QX100. However, it was very basic and didn't allow the software to change camera settings. It simply takes the picture and save it on the phone. I hope Sony will release a better API this time.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2014 at 17:16 UTC
On Hasselblad unveils pixel-shifting 200MP H5D-200c MS article (248 comments in total)
In reply to:

NetMage: Since Canon/Nikon aren't using IBIS, it would be neat if they could use lens IS to do this, even if just for still subjects.

The Hasselblad doesn't have IBIS neither, nor IS of any sort.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 22:29 UTC
On Hasselblad unveils pixel-shifting 200MP H5D-200c MS article (248 comments in total)
In reply to:

ProfHankD: Ok, this theoretically makes perfect sense... BUT how hard is it to hold the camera so still that the image isn't shifted between shots by amounts that are very significant compared to 5.3/2 microns? With a fully electronic shutter, maybe... and a leaf shutter should be better than focal plane... but from experience I know it is darn hard to get a camera and lens assembly bolted to a block of concrete to have that little motion between shots....

I would think a better approach would be to treat this by computationally aligning a bunch of images, assuming unknown movement, for standard superresolution processing. No?

I'm pretty sure tripod is required. On the old Hasselblad H3D 50 with the same pixel shifting technology, a shot took over half a minute. It's probably much faster now that they changed to CMOS sensor.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 22:25 UTC
On Hasselblad unveils pixel-shifting 200MP H5D-200c MS article (248 comments in total)
In reply to:

John TF: How close would GigaPan + DSLR approximate these images?

The problem with GigaPan or stitching in genera isl lens imperfection. For example, most lenses are not sharp in the corner, which is fine because the main subject seldom stays in the corner. However, when you stitch, the corner of a frame is inside the combined image. The same can be said about vignetting and distortion as well.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 21:53 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1282 comments in total)
In reply to:

DoctorJerry: As far as I am concerned, they can skip all the video crap and then drop the price to something more affordable. I can enjoy photography without having to worry or even use video. Would that make the camera lighter, faster? Maybe Panasonic should have 2 models, one with and one without 4k video.

Without video, this camera would weight 5 grams less and $5 cheaper to make.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 22:41 UTC
On Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review preview (2302 comments in total)

All the functional thinkers in this forum don't understand that an expensive Gucci hand bag doesn't really hold more stuff than a cheap bag.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 24, 2014 at 17:59 UTC as 565th comment | 3 replies
On Shockproof flagship: Olympus 'drops' new Tough TG-3 article (107 comments in total)

Everybody complains about the wrong thing. Even marketing material doesn't mention it. This camera is the granddaddy of underwater split image and water sport selfies. The reason is because it's the only compact camera that accepts a fisheye converter while remaining waterproof.

Previously the only way to shoot these kinds of images is to spend 10X the money on a DSLR waterproof housing and dome.

Why can't other compact waterproof cameras accept a teleconverter? Because they use vertically stacked lens, which pushes the lens to the upper right corner of the camera. There isn't enough room in the corner to put a waterproof adapter mount, not to mention that a big converter there would throw off the balance of the camera. The TG-3, on the other hand, has the lens at the middle of the camera.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 31, 2014 at 17:45 UTC as 15th comment
On CP+ 2014 interviews: What we learned article (93 comments in total)
In reply to:

justmeMN: In the West, we don't have a "if it's a little smaller it must be better" mentality.

@a Michael makes some good points, which I won't repeat.

Do Westerners tend to have bigger hands than Japanese? If a person has big hands, smaller is often ergonomically worse.

I don't think it's ergonomics. Westerners have been trained for decades that higher end cameras are bigger in size.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 6, 2014 at 16:30 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M10 First Impressions Review preview (618 comments in total)
In reply to:

wudyi: Can't keep track of all the numbers and letters.

The cryptic names are intentional. The manufacturer wants you to remember the word "Olympus", not the specific model or product line.

The problem with a memorable model name is that some models are hot sellers and get discussed a lot. People would remember only the hot models and buy them. Less discussed (low volume) models couldn't sell.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 29, 2014 at 17:56 UTC
On Best Gear of 2013: The results are in! article (159 comments in total)

Unfortunately the best doesn't always sell because:

. People make purchase decisions based on value
. Photographers got locked into a system
. Mediocre cameras of today are actually quite good
. Non-photographers buy the camera they see pros are using rather than the camera they need
. Innovation makes a good read, but they aren't always useful

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2014 at 02:05 UTC as 31st comment | 2 replies
On Backstory of Phantom Flex4K video shot at 1,000 FPS article (91 comments in total)

The cool thing about slomo is that it combines the thrill of motion with the beauty of still into one. It gives time to appreciate the beauty of things the eyes could've missed.

I'm watching this in 1080p and impressed and can't imagine what it would be like in 4K.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 15, 2013 at 21:42 UTC as 23rd comment
In reply to:

Naveed Akhtar: why would you need an android camera? when you can do pretty much everything with a wifi - nfc link to a mobile phone and it also act as a remote!!

Why not tether? While social apps can work tethered, photographic apps can't. For example, just try a panoramic app on Android/iPhone and you'd understand. At the time of capture, there's a nice on-screen guide that snaps frames together, allowing just the right amount of overlap. The phone's orientation sensor knows the angle of the phone and tilts the preview image accordingly. When done, the quad core processor removes vignette, corrects distortion, adjusts white balance and exposure differences between frames, and stitches them together. None of these apps work with a remote camera attached to the phone.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 14, 2013 at 18:24 UTC
In reply to:

Naveed Akhtar: why would you need an android camera? when you can do pretty much everything with a wifi - nfc link to a mobile phone and it also act as a remote!!

@wansai

I understand your point, except $1600 is the price point of an enthusiast camera. Can you name one pro DSLR that's $1600? It's the enthusiasts who need something new to explore, something hasn't been done before to expand creativity. Pros don't care. They just want to do what they're paid to do in the most efficient manner.

The target audience for this camera is for those who have been using iPhone photography apps for a while and want better image quality. They value connectivity, social, and effects over egornomics and manual controls.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 14, 2013 at 18:24 UTC
In reply to:

Naveed Akhtar: why would you need an android camera? when you can do pretty much everything with a wifi - nfc link to a mobile phone and it also act as a remote!!

Because of Apps. Tethering a camera to a phone is a transional thing, not a permanent thing. It's a clunky solution that needs an answer. It's the same ugliness as a CD player hooked up to a car via tape adapter.

After a few years, what people would be locked on is the apps. The camera is just hardware platform that supports the app. It matters little what camera is used, as long as the app is there, just like in the phone world. If youre life is dependent on listening to music via Pandora, it doesn't matter which phone you use, as long as the Pandora app works on the phone.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 12, 2013 at 22:57 UTC

The lure of this camera is the ability to use photography Apps on a large sensor camera. For some people, like the 150 million active Instagram users, these Apps are the only way to capture/edit/share images. Swithing to a traditional camera requires a steep learning curve with an interface that doesn't make sense.

Just look at the way an image from a DSLR getting uploaded to the web. It's a big hassle and not something a non-techie can easily figure out. Same with displaying photos to a home TV without an HDMI cord (viaTV Link). After using apps for a while, the old way seem unecessary redundant.

Comparing the Galaxy NX to a DSLR, or presenting it to a traditional DSLR audience would make it look silly. Instead, it should be compared to the iPhone or the Sony QX.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 12, 2013 at 19:02 UTC as 33rd comment | 1 reply
On Another Hasselblad rebadge or Photoshopped hoax? article (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

REDred Photo: Over the years, DPR has come a long way to becoming a highly respected review service with a scientific approach and the most comprehensive reviews out there. They've also had their finger on the pulse of every important product and issue in the photo industry. I've often thought of them as the Washington Post of the photography world.

Now, with their continual posting of rumors, industry gossip, and gimmicky, unrelated cell phone coverage, I get a vibe more akin to National Inquirer. Sure, there's real news on this site but there's a bit too much fluff. It feels less editorial than it used to, with more focus on marketing new products.

DPR, please be careful not to alienate your most "mature" followers in your zeal to gather more "teenager" fans.

If you only want official information, please visit manufacturer websites.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2013 at 00:36 UTC
Total: 162, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »