Lives in United States Houghton, MI, United States
Works as a Chemistry Professor
Joined on Oct 25, 2011
About me:

Love: The outdoors, gardening, ice skating, quadline and inline skating, cycling, skiing, snowboarding. Always looking for the perfect Disney vacation camera!


Total: 78, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
In reply to:

xfoto: I don't care what it does...and I don't give a crap about tiny stuff you can barely hold to comfortably take a picture

I have half ownership in a Lytro. It is a novel PITA that takes crappy pictures. I hear the RX100 is a PITA that takes great pictures . . . . . . . until you compare it to s $3500 camera!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2012 at 18:49 UTC
In reply to:

Sdaniella: Best of 2012?
It's small size exacts too high a price in poor ergonomics for pocketability. as well as a small sensor packed w/ too much Mp exacts a price in poor IQ; that's a double compromise, just so one lugs less than a full dSLR in hopes of having good flexible IQ:


can't even keep up w/ the PowerShot G1X for IQ

Nothing worse than someone who thinks they know it all, and then uses unrealistic comparisons to back it up.

The four cameras you chose are not even in the same realistic market segments. One could, perhaps, argue the G1X and RX100 are in a close market segment, but even that is a stretch considering the RX100 weighs half that of the G1X, is 2.8 times smaller in terms of volume, and costs 30% less.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2012 at 18:39 UTC

Wow! Yuk!

I suppose my ideal would be the lens and control ring from an Olympus XZ2, sensor from 4/3, the body of a smaller powershot G series with articlulated screen, A dial for aperture/shutter/compensation depending on mode, RAW capable, Optical Image stabilization from Lumix or Canon, and access to the battery and card on the side of the camera.

Shake them up, adjust to satisfy the laws of physics and see what I get.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 20, 2012 at 18:44 UTC as 232nd comment
On A Serious Rangefinder Compact Camera article (137 comments in total)

Deleted and moved to other forum!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 20, 2012 at 18:41 UTC as 50th comment
On A Serious Rangefinder Compact Camera article (137 comments in total)

Yuk! That has to be one of the world's ugliest, and most cumbersome cameras ever! You would spend more time checking that each button is in the correct place than you would taking pictures. I'm all for a bit of manual control that does not involve mega menus, but moving it to mega stacked buttons and dials is asking for trouble.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 20, 2012 at 18:34 UTC as 51st comment | 1 reply
On Canon Powershot G15 Preview preview (246 comments in total)

I was just looking at this camera as an alternative to the LX7, but the lack of a rotating screen is a disappointment and makes me wonder what to do now. On my G2, I used the rotating screen all the time for up high or down low shots. Bummed about that because the lumix does not seem to have one either. The sony, I can understand because it is so small.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2012 at 15:01 UTC as 23rd comment
In reply to:

ecm: Pretty good for a small sensor camera.

HOWEVER.....The thing that differentiated this line of Nikon cameras - the viewfinder - is gone.

And I'm left with the question, why would I buy this? There's much better image quality to be had for about the same price, size and weight in the micro-4/3 and NEX camera ranges, if I'm willing to buy last year's tech - up to 50% cheaper, actually - look at the Oly E-PL1 or Panny GF-3.

I still do not understand the second part of this post. Every time I read comments along the lines of "Well, I can get a 4/3 for about this price" I am left wondering if any one checks the size and price of 4/3 lenses before posting. In these short zoom range P&S cameras you are, OK, getting close, but a lot of people used this argument against the Lumix FZ200, which is insane. I am not even aware of a 25-600 f/2.8 for 4/3.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2012 at 13:51 UTC
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 review article (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

jhinkey: Yes, the review style is kind of sub-par for DPR, but still usable for sure. DPR needs to keep up their former high standards as they obviously are transitioning the site to something else. In contrast, the tablet review was absolutely terrible.

Just bought the LX-7 to replace my LX-5 (had an LX-3 before that). Why do I keep coming back to these cameras?

It's the combination of features in an extremely small package.

24mm FF equivalent fast lens at the wide end - missing in almost all cameras of this class
True 16:9 mode and true multi-aspect sensor
Built-in flash
Switches/buttons instead of buried menus
RW2 (though only for dynamic range)
Decent size to hold on to - not too small nor to large
Availability of excellent leather case
Very very decent video
Good enough IQ

Does it have problems? Sure, but for me it has been the best compact camera for my uses thus far, including the new RX100 (which does not have true 16:9 nor 24mm and is more fiddly to use because of it's size).

My main concern about the RX100 series is the kind of limitations that sensor puts on the lens. Sure, you get better ISO images, but with brighter lenses you do not need to go up to that ISO anyway. Just look at the ZX-1 at low ISO. The image quality, IMHO, is still cleaner than the RX100.

The wrinkle in this argument is size. What would the RX100 be capable of if they had used a larger body and less megapixels on that sensor? The body to sensor size in the RX100, is really where it shines, and one of the reasons I have been thinking about a purchase.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 18:25 UTC
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 review article (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rachotilko: This thing has *fast* lens (even on the long end) of very high optical quality. That makes it an outstanding device, in some aspects more usable than Sony RX100.

I am really tired of the 1" and RX100 mantra claiming this to be the sole way to achieve good low-light capability. This is different approach ("small sensor+fast lens") to achieve low-light capability.

Took me a while to realize what you were saying about the mantra. I too am interested in the alternatives, particularly when you compare these new cameras to the old Olympus XZ-1 at low ISO. The image quality of that "old" camera still seems a lot cleaner than any of the newer cameras at sub 200 ISO.

I just bought the FZ200, and am very happy with what it does despite the "small" sensor, although I have only scratched the surface of what it is capable of. My last point and shoot was a Fuji 3D, which seemed like a good idea at the time and was a bad idea when it came to real photo taking. Before that, I had the FZ5, which I still think was one of the best point and shoots ever.

What I am looking for now though is a pocket camera with excellent low light capabilities. I am somewhat flexible on the term "pocket" so the RX100, LX7, and XZ-2 are all on my radar, so having as many opportunities to objectively compare is important to me.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 18:18 UTC
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 review article (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mike Sandman: A quibble: It would have been nice to have the usual discussion in the conclusion section about how this camera stacks up against its direct competitors, and perhaps how this class of camera fares vs. the Sony DSC-RX100 (OK, a more expensive small camera but with a far larger sensor). Instead we get links to other reviews, which is OK, but... that's not a replacement for a more robust comparison.

Agreed! I realize these two cameras are in different sensor categories, but they are the two cameras I am considering for purchase, along with the Olympus. So, it would be great if we were given the option to compare them in the comparison part of the conclusion.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 16, 2012 at 00:30 UTC
On Canon EOS 6D preview (1035 comments in total)
In reply to:

Suave: Frankly, I don't see why people are so upset. It's lot more than 7D, but not that much more expensive, and it's a lot less than 5D3, but quite a bit cheaper. It's properly positioned camera for people who do not think that switching brands will make them a better photographer and better person.

Thing to remember is that the 7D is a year old, so it might have all these features except for the bigger sensor. At least I hope it does.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 17:48 UTC
On Canon EOS 6D preview (1035 comments in total)
In reply to:

onlooker: As a $1500 camera, it would have been a killer. I like replaceable screens, and I don't mind 11-point AF as long as the center point has high accuracy and low-light sensitivity. Silent shutter is great. So, all good on paper, except the price.

Surely the cost of the body in this range is less than the glass. IF you need to replace all your best EFS glass with equivalent EF glass, that is a lot of money.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 17:47 UTC
On Canon EOS 6D preview (1035 comments in total)
In reply to:

butterfly0fdoom: "How often do you really need to record files to two different cards, for example?"

The biggest benefits of having two SD card slots is having one card act as overflow and/or having one card being the primary still card with the other as the primary video card. Better file management and cheaper alternative to high-capacity cards.

A 32GB Sandisk Extreme only costs $32, and the 64GB is not twice that. Two 16GB cards cost more than twice one 32GB card, so you are actually better off (financially) with a larger card these days. Certainly was not true 5 years ago though.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 17:45 UTC
On Canon Powershot S110 Preview preview (107 comments in total)

Wow! What an uninspired update. I was looking at the RX100 and hoping for an amazing update to the xz-1, and Canon come out with this in response? I guess they have just given up in this segment. Off to check out the G15 now!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 17:09 UTC as 37th comment | 1 reply
On Canon EOS 6D preview (1035 comments in total)

I'm beginning to wonder if the Canon Design Team have been bashed on the head because their design decisions of late are very confusing.

Someone who is already at full frame will probably not want to downgrade, and people with APC (like me) have one or two EFS lenses that make the upgrade from a 7D really expensive, and who knows what the next 7D will offer . . . It there is to be one!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 16:59 UTC as 293rd comment
On Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 review article (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

J. Qian: Sony has gone to great lengths to make this camera small, supposedly for travel , then why not have a GPS function built in it?

The Canon S100 is the classic example of why no GPS. It chews up battery life. It is pretty simply to carry a GPS logger in your pocket and just Geotag later. This means you have two devices, but they are now both maximizing their potential, and having a separate GPS logger helps those you travel with as well.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 17:44 UTC
On Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 review article (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

BMWX5: So far, close to 80% or more of the comments gave RX100 a GOLD award! Majority wins, RX100 is golden!

I was surprised that it only got a silver award. Was this just because of the click wheel? Why does the Sony SLT-A65 get a gold award with 78% and the RX-100 only get silver? Not that it matters.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 17:41 UTC
On Just Posted: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 review article (373 comments in total)
In reply to:

JohnFredC: If Sony can fit a 14x zoom into my wife's HX9V, a camera essentially the same size as the RX100, then surely they could have fit a 5x or 6x zoom into this camera, despite the larger sensor.

The RX100 is too capable a tool to be saddled with such a slight zoom.

Unfortunately, violating the laws of physics is not allowed! A larger zoom range (or constant aperture) would require either a smaller sensor or a physically larger camera.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2012 at 17:39 UTC
On Panasonic DMC FZ200 preview (155 comments in total)
In reply to:

kb2zuz: Is my math correct that with f/2.8 on that sensor size, the DOF would be equivalent to an f/16 lens on a full-frame camera (at equivalent focal length, of course)?

I'm always interested by this measurement because it seems to be popping up a lot these days.

Does this mean that you have virtually no control over DOF on cameras with such a small sensor, and that almost everything will be in focus? I suppose, in one sense this is actually a good thing, but it limits creative photography, which is why the Sony RX100 exists. I wonder if this will be an issue with the LX7.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 19, 2012 at 13:40 UTC
On Panasonic DMC FZ200 preview (155 comments in total)

I am really excited by the potential of this camera with its f/2.8. I have been using Lumix DMC-FZ5 since it came out and it has been a really superb instrument. I think it was the last of the f/2.8 models until this one was announced. This has the potential to become a near perfect "Disney" or "Safari" camera for those who do not want a pocket or SLR camera. I love the fact that my FZ5 has f/2.8 over the full 12X zoom range, but the sensor technology is old and back then shooting above 400 iso meant a lot of noise. With this I could be shooting at 800 or 1600 ISO at 600 mm and f/2.8 and that is worth a lot to me. Sure, I could take my SLR and a bag of lenses to Disney, but I'd look like a total idiot!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 19, 2012 at 13:35 UTC as 41st comment
Total: 78, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »