Jerry Pruce

Jerry Pruce

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jan 2, 2003

Comments

Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11
In reply to:

Jerry Pruce: The more pixels the better. But why does it have to be so expensive? If it was around $3000 I'd buy it. And I wish they would make it smaller. Maybe in the next year or two, they'll come out with the 200mp version and the 100mp one will drop in price more to my liking. I think their shooting themselves in the foot by not offering the camera at an affordable price for the masses.

Well you caught me. I was trolling. Don't know what came over me. Just couldn't help myself. Seriously, the Phase 1 looks like a terrific camera for the select pro and well worth the price, although the huge files probably need 64gb of ram to work them and equally huge HD's. I have a Sony A6000 wth a couple nice lens It's the best camera I've ever had. 24mp is all that I need and more.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 01:19 UTC
In reply to:

TonyPM: I think this is the camera that was fitted on the Sr71 after a trip in a DeLorean...

Well you caught me. I was trolling. Don't know what came over me. Just couldn't help myself. Seriously, the Phase 1 looks like a terrific camera for the select pro and well worth the price, although the huge files probably need 64gb of ram to work them and equally huge HD's. I have a Sony A6000 wth a couple nice lens It's the best camera I've ever had. 24mp is all that I need and more.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 01:18 UTC
In reply to:

Jerry Pruce: The more pixels the better. But why does it have to be so expensive? If it was around $3000 I'd buy it. And I wish they would make it smaller. Maybe in the next year or two, they'll come out with the 200mp version and the 100mp one will drop in price more to my liking. I think their shooting themselves in the foot by not offering the camera at an affordable price for the masses.

Well maybe 100mp is a little too big. It would probably be better if they would have made it 90mp. Then the camera could be less expensive. Sigma did the same thing with their DSLR a few years ago and got hammered and eventually lowered the price. Also it doesn't look like it has an articulated LCD. What were they thinking?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2016 at 18:43 UTC

The more pixels the better. But why does it have to be so expensive? If it was around $3000 I'd buy it. And I wish they would make it smaller. Maybe in the next year or two, they'll come out with the 200mp version and the 100mp one will drop in price more to my liking. I think their shooting themselves in the foot by not offering the camera at an affordable price for the masses.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 3, 2016 at 17:45 UTC as 114th comment | 18 replies
On article A lot to Leica? Hands-on with the Leica SL (Typ 601) (1492 comments in total)

Nearly $13,000 with the kit lens. There is a sucker born everyday.......

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2015 at 01:59 UTC as 317th comment

This changes everything......

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2015 at 16:31 UTC as 14th comment
On Connect post Apple reveals 12.9-inch iPad Pro (209 comments in total)
In reply to:

otto k: A stylus!? They are doing it wrong! ;)

Wrong. they're doing it right. Artists like myself as well designers will love it.....

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2015 at 23:37 UTC
On Connect post Apple reveals 12.9-inch iPad Pro (209 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cheng Bao: (Steve Jobs: It's like we said on the iPad, if you see a stylus, they blew it. In multitasking, if you see a task manager... they blew it. Users shouldn't ever have to think about it.

They didn't blow it at all. I'm an artist. I use my iPad Air 2 to draw and make digital paintings. The stylus I use is third party. I love it it. This new pad and stylus takes it to a whole new level. I'm onboard.......

Direct link | Posted on Sep 9, 2015 at 23:35 UTC
On article Going solo: DxO introduces 20MP 'ONE' connected camera (127 comments in total)

What a really dumb idea. And $599, give me a break.......

Direct link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 15:00 UTC as 40th comment
On article Sony rides wave of US Mirrorless sales surge (733 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tommygun45: Granted, since the A6000 there were limitations to what mirrorless could do. Now there are no more excuses. Whatever comes after the A6000 will officially be a superior camera in almost all regards to any non-FF DSLR that Nikon, Canon, or Pentax has to offer. Oh, and alot cheaper. It will have better IQ, likely better AF, better tracking, better FPS, and probably a better buffer than all but the 7d2 which has crap IQ. Weather sealing, build quality, and battery life will be about the only things that high end DSLRs will still have an advantage in, and the majority of people, (about 95% of non pros) don't really care about those things. With lenses, what's needed is basically already covered for most.

Before you know it the pro who uses a dslr is going to be like the journalist who still uses a typewriter. People sort of respect him, but most just think he's crazy.

I have an A6000. It is way better than my Nikon D7100. I love it. The Nikon is built better, has better battery life, and you can move the focus points around easier. That's about it. The A6000's image quality is the equal of the D7100. But the main reason I switched was the size and weight. Also, it is less conspicuous. I've always been a Nikon person. Sony has won me over. As soon as Sony upgrades the A6000, I'll get one.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 4, 2015 at 14:48 UTC
On article Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III Review (855 comments in total)

Finally a review. It's been nearly a month and a half since the last product review. With all the cameras/lenses out there still to be reviewed, you'd think DPR would be on it. Their way slow......

Direct link | Posted on Jun 23, 2014 at 15:47 UTC as 183rd comment | 1 reply
Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11