hii really like this camerai'm a canon shooteralways loved to have a camera like this , old style with the new techonology
can't wait to try it!
thanks to digital review for the review!
hiwow i would love to have such cameraa retro camera like nikon F , f2m with the new techonology would really awesome!
hithanks a lot for the reviewabout this camera i miss the c1 c2 :(
looks a cool lensi like a lot the new sigma lensthe 35 is amazing hope this lens is great too
Emacs23: I tried Prime and I must say one can better buy Topaz Denoise instead of upgrade to the new version (as I did), it just doesn't worth it. The luminance NR was already best built in NR on the market in v8, the new one advanced it even further, but it is too painfully slow. Topaz denoise is faster (and better in detail preservation). Just my $0.02.BTW, it was my last purchase of DxO stuff. These improvements don't worth new major version. +0.5 at best, definitely not +1.0
hiwhy? do you think topaz denoise is better?
The Photo Ninja: I like it and plan on paying for it. It's a little sluggish, but the results are amazing! Running on a brand new 27" imac with i7 3.5ghz, 32gb ram, 780mx video card, 1tb ssd.
and it's sluggish with your hardware?wondering to know which hardware does it need to run faster
I would like to try themno more optic viewfinder :(
can't wait to try them
hi does the plugin contain lens database?
mantra: Hibut DxO ViewPoint v1.2.1 plugin does correct lens distortion like dxo ?with lens profiles or it's pure manual?
thanks!but cs6 has a filter like that!
Hibut DxO ViewPoint v1.2.1 plugin does correct lens distortion like dxo ?with lens profiles or it's pure manual?
dwalk: This might be the replacement for my 50D. Hopefully the 70D has really good low light/ high iso performance in real life. While i love the magnesium body of the 50D, the lack of it in the 70D is not a deal breaker for me, esp as the 70D still has good ?? weather seals. What do you think? Is the lack of a magnesium body a deal breaker, meaning we wait for a 7D mkD, or is the feature set of the 70 a good enought reason to upgrade now?
hii can find the informationbut is the body of magnesium?
is a good idea work in 16bit to have gradients with more shading ?in short more back and white shading
hi i would love to see lightzone ,now it's open source and it's a great great software
looks really a great camera
does someone know how could I clean the sensor seeing there is not low pass?
i guess it's really more dangerous , because the low pass is a "glass"
incredible how nikon is competitive ,lots of features ,image quality ,focus system ....... and price
hido you know I never understood Dxo ?
in short i read the article
is the point that 36mp are too much for nikkor lenses outside few new lenses?
if i got the point , it's not a great discovery
just think to the past canon sensors and the current 1.5 or 1.6 sensors
i think nikon develop the d800 to be the king in pro studio photography
i find the new acr 4.7 rc slower then before!
under windows 7 , did you notice the same?
Noogy: DPR can continue to lavish praises over the D600 and I don't care. They completely ignored the quality control issues in the process, yet felt it was ok to give it a gold rating. Come on guys! But then again that's the reason I proceeded to buy the 6D way before this review came out, because DPR ceases to be the benchmark on camera reviews that it used to be.
but almost every Dsrl come with a dirty sensor
oil or dust
noogy may i ask you where did you read about QC ?QC=quality control
in short this is the end of the 1.6 sensori mean no more semi pro camera like 20,30D,50D and 7Dit's sad
but about an upgrade the 7d mark 2 would have the 5d mark 3 af , so on the paper outisde the sensor should be a semi pro
about the 6d is a semi pro only because it's more cheap then the 5d mark 3
to be honest i would love to see a 1.3 sensor on the 7D , it would be amazing