hii still have lightroom v4 64bit ,for it permorms better then v5honestly i did not find new v5 feature to push me to buy v5
is really v5 more powerfull then v4?is worth to upgrade?
by the way thanks for the video!
Henrik Herranen: MTF for the EF-S 10-18:http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/ef_lens_lineup/ef_s_10_18mm_f_4_5_5_6_is_stm
Are my eyes deceiving me or does the MTF look seriously impressive for a 300$ lens?
And although it was posted earlier, here's a reposted 16-35/4 IS link:http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/ef_lens_lineup/ef_16_35mm_f_4l_is_usm
hi i have never understood the mft chart :(
i'm talking about the EF
hihope will better then 16-35 2.8 II
i would love a 12-24 EF , in short a super wide EF lens...
but can't wait to test the new 16-35
hii would like to read the review of the eletronic viewfinder
hibut can't understand one thinga friend of mine bought the d4 about 4 or 5 month ago and it was not cheap!!now nikon releases the D4swhat's about the d4? it's already devalued or?thanks
AbrasiveReducer: One of these days the Chinese are going to start making these without any plastic and look out Manfrotto. You can already see what they've done with ball heads and Arca releases.
hisorry which ball heads and arca are you talking?are talking about berno?
Hibut the head is a ball head or video head
there is not an eletronic view finder!i can't understand canon
it will be like EOS M1
hibut seems a different sensor compared to the great d4 , doesn't it?
but the sony alpha 7 is really impressivecan't wait for a full review
hisad , i voted for this photo!is she greek?
cheers from italy
mantra: Hithanks for the reviewbut i have never understood how dxo perform such testsfor example a camera like Nikon D5200 that i can buy for 450€ is rated better then canon 1dx or the 5d mark3
or for example the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 better then Phase One IQ180 or Nikon d4
really i tried to read everything ,i have never understood
by the way thanks for the preview !
yes , well i see the a2 printsreally can't understand how the d5200 can perform bettern then a pro camera or medium format...
even a 5d (2004) give an image quaility that a d5200 can even dreamin short really i can 't understand dxo reviewalways liked digital review review
Hithanks for the reviewbut i have never understood how dxo perform such testsfor example a camera like Nikon D5200 that i can buy for 450€ is rated better then canon 1dx or the 5d mark3
hii really like this camerai'm a canon shooteralways loved to have a camera like this , old style with the new techonology
can't wait to try it!
thanks to digital review for the review!
hiwow i would love to have such cameraa retro camera like nikon F , f2m with the new techonology would really awesome!
hithanks a lot for the reviewabout this camera i miss the c1 c2 :(
looks a cool lensi like a lot the new sigma lensthe 35 is amazing hope this lens is great too
Emacs23: I tried Prime and I must say one can better buy Topaz Denoise instead of upgrade to the new version (as I did), it just doesn't worth it. The luminance NR was already best built in NR on the market in v8, the new one advanced it even further, but it is too painfully slow. Topaz denoise is faster (and better in detail preservation). Just my $0.02.BTW, it was my last purchase of DxO stuff. These improvements don't worth new major version. +0.5 at best, definitely not +1.0
hiwhy? do you think topaz denoise is better?
The Photo Ninja: I like it and plan on paying for it. It's a little sluggish, but the results are amazing! Running on a brand new 27" imac with i7 3.5ghz, 32gb ram, 780mx video card, 1tb ssd.
and it's sluggish with your hardware?wondering to know which hardware does it need to run faster
I would like to try themno more optic viewfinder :(
can't wait to try them