NowHearThis

One of the few things one the web that doesn't seem like "fakery".  There is no reason for them to make m43 look larger - they could care less.  All they're doing is trying to get a very very close...

Looks like only 1 inch difference in length when both are closed.  Weight is certainly another matter - but the difference is a meager 153g or 5.4 oz.  Not an issue even if you're packing it around...

Not me. Bingo.  the 35/1.8 OSS is $450, I suspect the Tamron will cost a bit more, be both larger and heavier and might not have OSS (VC).  All downers for just 2/3 of a stop with no guarantee...

I'm going to go with NEX 7T (Seventy) :)

Sony isn't going to make a brand new camera and call it the same thing a previous model.  But you knew that, right? Who says the Sony rumor site gets to decide what the NEX 7 succesor should be...

1/320 flash sync speed is nice, ISO 100 is nice to see again too.

Not from what I found, and from what others reviews have said, the 16-105 is not as sharp as the 16-80 is away from the center of the frame.  Subjectively the Color and contrast of the zeiss seems...

You just answered your own question. Everyone already knows that lens is excellent, some things a just a given. ;)

http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-08-10/business/35492808_1_galaxy-s-ii-samsung-galaxy-tab-phil-schiller 85 Milliion sold in 5 years, in the USA alone vs ...much less from the DSLR...

Exactly.  I posted a few shot on another forum, a "mediocre consumer grade superzoom" could not have taken shots as sharp as these:

You speak out of ignorance.  I paid $510 for the 18-200, I also paid under $900 for the NEX7 kit, I then sold the 18-55 for $150, which puts my investment total to $1260.   So there's no need for...

I don't know if you realize how dumb of a statement that is.  Did you even read the original post?  Did you even read the first line of mine:  here let me quote it for you because you seem to rush...

Really, you think I want to preach to you?  Sorry, that's not my calling in life. You whole point revolves around length, mine is about the overall size.  Back when I was looking to switch cameras...

http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51298646 I had the exact same primary setup as you: a Canon T2i (550d) + 15-85 IS lens.  While I liked the lens, I still found there were times I needed/wanted...

With respect, I am going to disagree with both your statements. I bought the NEX7 for it's Image Quality, the "smallness" was a just a big plus.  One of the advantages of the NEX is it's short,...

That's not quite correct.  My NEX7, 18-200, 50mm, flash, charger and tons of extras fit in the very small Tamrac Aero 36 (model 3336) bag.  (not shown but also fits: neck strap, & hurricane...

True. But I used to shoot with a Canon Rebel; I'm still bitter about that experience.  lol -- NHTwhile ( ! ( succeed = try() ) );

Just a little bit of a stretch, but I get what you mean.  I'm a NEX-7 user, but I appreciate what Fuji is doing and wish others would follow suit.  This is a good move by Fuji, offer something much...

Regardless of Photozone.... the 15-85 was a great lens.  It's biggest flaw is lens flare.  Sharpness, Contrast, and color are all very good. first one was at 24mm the second about 50mm, both...

The 3N is a great little camera paired up with the 16-50 and you have a very nice, very small package that will take excellent photos.  The sensor in the 3n holds its own up against much more...