-
One of the few things one the web that doesn't seem like "fakery". There is no reason for them to make m43 look larger - they could care less. All they're doing is trying to get a very very close...
-
Looks like only 1 inch difference in length when both are closed. Weight is certainly another matter - but the difference is a meager 153g or 5.4 oz. Not an issue even if you're packing it around...
-
Not me.
Bingo. the 35/1.8 OSS is $450, I suspect the Tamron will cost a bit more, be both larger and heavier and might not have OSS (VC). All downers for just 2/3 of a stop with no guarantee...
-
I'm going to go with NEX 7T (Seventy) :)
-
Sony isn't going to make a brand new camera and call it the same thing a previous model. But you knew that, right?
Who says the Sony rumor site gets to decide what the NEX 7 succesor should be...
-
1/320 flash sync speed is nice, ISO 100 is nice to see again too.
-
Not from what I found, and from what others reviews have said, the 16-105 is not as sharp as the 16-80 is away from the center of the frame. Subjectively the Color and contrast of the zeiss seems...
-
You just answered your own question. Everyone already knows that lens is excellent, some things a just a given. ;)
-
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-08-10/business/35492808_1_galaxy-s-ii-samsung-galaxy-tab-phil-schiller
85 Milliion sold in 5 years, in the USA alone vs ...much less from the DSLR...
-
Exactly.
I posted a few shot on another forum, a "mediocre consumer grade superzoom" could not have taken shots as sharp as these:
-
You speak out of ignorance. I paid $510 for the 18-200, I also paid under $900 for the NEX7 kit, I then sold the 18-55 for $150, which puts my investment total to $1260. So there's no need for...
-
I don't know if you realize how dumb of a statement that is. Did you even read the original post? Did you even read the first line of mine: here let me quote it for you because you seem to rush...
-
Really, you think I want to preach to you? Sorry, that's not my calling in life.
You whole point revolves around length, mine is about the overall size. Back when I was looking to switch cameras...
-
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51298646
I had the exact same primary setup as you: a Canon T2i (550d) + 15-85 IS lens. While I liked the lens, I still found there were times I needed/wanted...
-
With respect, I am going to disagree with both your statements. I bought the NEX7 for it's Image Quality, the "smallness" was a just a big plus. One of the advantages of the NEX is it's short,...
-
That's not quite correct. My NEX7, 18-200, 50mm, flash, charger and tons of extras fit in the very small Tamrac Aero 36 (model 3336) bag. (not shown but also fits: neck strap, & hurricane...
-
True. But I used to shoot with a Canon Rebel; I'm still bitter about that experience. lol
--
NHTwhile ( ! ( succeed = try() ) );
-
Just a little bit of a stretch, but I get what you mean. I'm a NEX-7 user, but I appreciate what Fuji is doing and wish others would follow suit. This is a good move by Fuji, offer something much...
-
Regardless of Photozone.... the 15-85 was a great lens. It's biggest flaw is lens flare. Sharpness, Contrast, and color are all very good.
first one was at 24mm the second about 50mm, both...
-
The 3N is a great little camera paired up with the 16-50 and you have a very nice, very small package that will take excellent photos. The sensor in the 3n holds its own up against much more...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
| Total messages |
1876 |
| Threads started |
55 |
| Last post |
6 hours ago |
| Total reviews |
2 |
| Last review |
Mar 24, 2012 |
| Entries |
1 |
| Votes cast |
62 |
| Last entry |
Aug 21, 2009 |
| Photos uploaded |
68 |
| Last upload |
11 months ago |
|