This new season of Vikings is a lot tamer than I remember.
That's actually a pretty good list. If my X-E1 did even one eighth of those things he suggests I'd be incredibly happy with it.
Beat Traveller: This thread doesn't really need another 'what is the point of this' post from someone who would never really buy one, but I just don't get it. Leica prices are hard to justify even when the IQ is top notch, but considering that you can get a Sony for less with more resolution it does baffle me.
To all of you: IQ does not equal resolution, but resolution is one component of it.
This thread doesn't really need another 'what is the point of this' post from someone who would never really buy one, but I just don't get it. Leica prices are hard to justify even when the IQ is top notch, but considering that you can get a Sony for less with more resolution it does baffle me.
Gee, there's a lot of noise even at the base ISO. What gives?
Geez... it's going to be harder to improve on these cameras soon...
kadardr: Where is the NX1 review? This one is simply insignificant. And you say you are unbiased?
I think the meme around here is actually "where is the K3 review"
Good review, inane comments as usual.
Stephan Def: I am trying to understand what the compelling argument for Fujifilm is, scratching my head. Megapixels matter, if its just only for the cropping capability alone. 16MP seems not to be cutting edge stuff anymore, except if they are on smartphone camera.
I used to think what matters is what the image looks like that comes out of the Camera. Strangely for me, so many here are going on about if the Camera itself is nice looking or not. And so on.
Colour profiles and control schemes are the two big ones.
This is good. Not quite the price range I'd expect, but a good step from Nikon. Now let's see if they can release some more wide primes.
Doesn't look any different to me.
Good article! It's a very exciting prospect this A7rII, even if the name is closer to resembling a car numberplate.
tkbslc: The X100 series has delivered on this camera's exact goal for several years now. Not sure what the fuss is about.
It's like an X100 with a bit of extra juice in certain departments. Bigger sensor, faster lens, and hopefully better zone focusing implementation.
The X100's OVF is a huge advantage though.
I just read the part about PDAF and third party lenses. What a game changer! 2015 potentially belongs to Sony in terms of innovation.
Look forward to seeing some actual pics so we can gauge how big an improvement the sensor is.
This is a pretty freaking sweet camera. The price is well out of my league but I can dream.
The only thing that could really make it better is a hybrid OVF/EVF like the X100.
Papi61: I think that in 2015 many people would consider the absence of 4K video a deal breaker. Especially now that the Lumix G7 is out.
Did you actually watch the video or just read the title? It's an overview of the camera, presented by video. It's not an overview of the X-T10's video.
Beat Traveller: Oh my, such sharp, very colour.
In all seriousness, great photos... although I don't know if this is the ideal lens for close up flower macros.
So... you've elected to follow me around this website and troll all my comments? How mature.
Different strokes for different folks is all I'm saying.
Is it really worth everyone freaking out because this camera doesn't have 4k and DPR chose to devote any amount of time to it?
Sean65: Interesting. This camera was announced at the same time as the Lumix G7 whose video feature may have been of more interest than the T10's.
No, I just get tired of coming on this site and seeing people whinge about why DPR has done a review/preview/video about camera A instead of camera B. It's incredibly petty.