rjx

rjx

Lives in United States Santa Clara USA, CA, United States
Works as a Odd person & noncontributing member of society
Joined on Oct 2, 2007
About me:

Learn as much about photography and create photographs people enjoy.

Comments

Total: 148, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On Is this the new Leica 'Mini M'? article (370 comments in total)
In reply to:

rjx: I wonder how many X-E1's you'll be able to buy for the price of one of these Mini M' cameras?

I failed to read it was $3100

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2013 at 20:48 UTC
On Is this the new Leica 'Mini M'? article (370 comments in total)

I wonder how many X-E1's you'll be able to buy for the price of one of these Mini M' cameras?

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2013 at 18:52 UTC as 167th comment | 1 reply
On Leica teases 'Mini M' for 11th June release article (304 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ron A 19: My guess is a leica version of the sony RX1. Since it's above the X2, it's likely to have a FF, and since it's below the M and M-E, likely to have a fixed lens. Should be very cool!

HowaboutRAW

Ron A 19 made perfect sense to me and never said or implied that the RX1 has interchangeable lenses.

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2013 at 02:52 UTC

Where do I find which exposure settings were used on a photo? If the user didn't strip that info, it used to be displayed on the bottom right side of the screen. Now I can't find it.

Where is the option to view EXIF info?

How do I replace a photo?

Looks nice, but it's slow. Usability is more important to me than looks.

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2013 at 05:57 UTC as 98th comment | 4 replies

Fuji, please release a firmware so the multiple exposure mode can produce RAF files (like the X-PRO1). I was very disappointed to learn my X100S will only produce JPEG files when using the multiple exposure mode.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2013 at 19:40 UTC as 13th comment | 1 reply

I like the idea of the 12mm. But why a 32mm 1.8 lens? I'm sure it will be a great quality lens hopefully with the great Zeiss microcontrast. But the Fuji 35mm 1.4 is a one of the best lenses on any system and it's half the price of the Zeiss 32mm. Why not release something different, like an 85mm prime?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 30, 2013 at 23:23 UTC as 37th comment | 9 replies

I bet dogs could make better videos than some humans I've seen.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2013 at 22:24 UTC as 16th comment | 3 replies

Does this mean all the ladies that use the Diva bag will be great singers?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2013 at 00:14 UTC as 24th comment
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nikonworks: Why do most of the 'Real World' samples on this web site all seem to be subjects that do not require a photo release?

Most of the 'Real World' shots we DPReview readers take are not the 'Real World' photos displayed in this article.

Please take this as constructive in nature.
Providing real 'Real World' photos would be very helpful to all of us here, both management and us readers.

Strange comment imo.

The images in this gallery (IMO) represent the kind of images most people make with the original X100, and will probably make with the X100S.

This is a small, take everywhere camera that is great for walking around and travel. You can use the camera for whatever genre you like, but I feel the images in this gallery represent how most people will use this camera.

Besides, the point of these galleries are to see what a camera is capable of at different exposures, different apertures, and different ISO's. People like you and I should be able to take that info and then determine what genres this or any other camera will be good at.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2013 at 15:23 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gasman66: I owned an X-100 for just over a year before I sold it. Build quality is excellent. Lens quality is too - as long as your subject is more than a metre away, and you don't want to focus quickly. Ergonomics were so-so, and software was just plain awful - and remained so after several software upgrades.

Because of this, I quickly found myself not using the camera, and it effectively became jewellery. That side of me misses it. My photographic productivity - doesn't.

I don't see enough new in the X-100s to dramatically change any of this. It's an improvement, but only an incremental one.

57. In Playback mode, add the ‘Information function’
58. In low light scene, LCD display becomes smooth.
59. After release the shutter button, immediately switch to playback mode.
60. After release the shutter button, could immediately use some key.
61. After bracket shooting,immediately switch to palyback mode.
62. When holding shutter button, LCD doesn’t freeze.
63. Support the SD-card used Macintosh.
64. In low EV scene, the exposure of LCD will adapt.
65. In Manual Exposure, the histogram will adapt.
66. In Post-viewing, eye sensor function can work
67. Support external microphone and electric release.
68. Change the information of setting external Flash

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2013 at 06:24 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gasman66: I owned an X-100 for just over a year before I sold it. Build quality is excellent. Lens quality is too - as long as your subject is more than a metre away, and you don't want to focus quickly. Ergonomics were so-so, and software was just plain awful - and remained so after several software upgrades.

Because of this, I quickly found myself not using the camera, and it effectively became jewellery. That side of me misses it. My photographic productivity - doesn't.

I don't see enough new in the X-100s to dramatically change any of this. It's an improvement, but only an incremental one.

42. Variation of aspect ratio 3:2, 16:9, and 1:1
43. Improved functionality in MF mode
44. Able to reset the setting separately
45. No formatting on the setting when updating FW
46. Change the default LCD information setting -> standard
47. Reset function added for every custom mode
48. Information of all F-simulation modes
49. Add ‘MARK FOR UPLOAD TO’ MyFinePix.com
50. Support ‘Eyefi Connected’
51. Holding Q-button is short-cut function
52. Remove ‘ISO AUTO’ to Shooting Menu
53. Change the location of ‘AF area select button’
54. Change the sub-function of ‘AF area select button’
55. Change the sub-function of ‘AE button’
56. Add the sub-function of ‘Fn button’

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2013 at 06:24 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gasman66: I owned an X-100 for just over a year before I sold it. Build quality is excellent. Lens quality is too - as long as your subject is more than a metre away, and you don't want to focus quickly. Ergonomics were so-so, and software was just plain awful - and remained so after several software upgrades.

Because of this, I quickly found myself not using the camera, and it effectively became jewellery. That side of me misses it. My photographic productivity - doesn't.

I don't see enough new in the X-100s to dramatically change any of this. It's an improvement, but only an incremental one.

25. ‘F-simulation bracketing’ function - one shot can produce 3 different Film Simulation images which can be pre-set.
26. ‘Advanced filter’ mode
27. ‘Multi Exposure’ function. While viewing your first shot on EVF or LCD as overlay, you can shoot a second shot.
28. ‘Shutter Counter’ counts every 100 shots.
29. The shape of viewfinder window changed to help prevent dust build-up
30. The strap attachment rings are double coated with stainless-steel layer
31. Improved the shape of ‘Viewfinder lever’
32. Improved the layout of ‘Focus lever’ (goes MF > AF-C > AF-S now)
33. Improved the operability of the ‘MENU/OK button’
34. Improved shape of the ‘Q button’ (was previously the RAW button)
35. Improved the shape of ‘Front Ring’
36. Improved the torque of ‘Exposure dial’
37. Improved layout of ‘Shutter speed dial’
38. Improved the design of Battery-chamber
39. Improved the shape of Hot shoe
40. Max ISO from 3200 to 6400 *ISO AUTO Mode
41. WB shift available in any mode

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2013 at 06:23 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gasman66: I owned an X-100 for just over a year before I sold it. Build quality is excellent. Lens quality is too - as long as your subject is more than a metre away, and you don't want to focus quickly. Ergonomics were so-so, and software was just plain awful - and remained so after several software upgrades.

Because of this, I quickly found myself not using the camera, and it effectively became jewellery. That side of me misses it. My photographic productivity - doesn't.

I don't see enough new in the X-100s to dramatically change any of this. It's an improvement, but only an incremental one.

14. EVF has a 2.35 mil dot LCD
15. A new protective coating on the surface of the view-finder window prevents fingerprints and smudging.
16. The handling and response on focus ring has been improved.
17. The shooting range of the OVF has been expanded from 80cm-∞ to 50cm-∞
18. The world’s first MF system ‘Digital Split Image’. It uses the phase detection to show accurate focus peaking.
See demo: http://youtu.be/_fJDX1hzUIg
19. ‘Focus Peak Highlight’ function helps you to check the focal plane.
See demo: http://youtu.be/PMdQpgOzd4o
20. In Movie Shooting, it is possible to choose 3 kinds of focusing modes
MF/ AF-C and AF-S.
21. Expanded AF shooting range from 40cm – infinity (X100) to 21cm – infinity (X100S). *not on Macro mode
22. Quick (Q) Button for speed and instant access to shooting menus.
23. Multi Tab Menu easy and fast navigation
24. Two new Film simulation functions added: Pro Neg.Std and Pro Neg. Hi

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2013 at 06:22 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gasman66: I owned an X-100 for just over a year before I sold it. Build quality is excellent. Lens quality is too - as long as your subject is more than a metre away, and you don't want to focus quickly. Ergonomics were so-so, and software was just plain awful - and remained so after several software upgrades.

Because of this, I quickly found myself not using the camera, and it effectively became jewellery. That side of me misses it. My photographic productivity - doesn't.

I don't see enough new in the X-100s to dramatically change any of this. It's an improvement, but only an incremental one.

Here's a complete list of all 68 improvements the X100S has over the X100. Most of these changes were as a result of the fantastic feedback provided by X100 users.

1. 16-megapixel sensor, up from 12-megapixel
2. X-Trans CMOS II sensor eliminates need for Optical Low Pass Filter
2. The resolution has improved to match Full Frame domain sensors
3. The Signal to Noise ratio improved to be on a par with Full Frame domain sensors
4. Phase detection pixels allow 0.07 sec Auto focus
6. 1080p 60fps full HD movie
7. Improved start-up time. From 2.0sec to 0.9sec
8. Continuous Shooting from 5fps up to 6fps
9. Number of consecutive frames while using Continuous Shooting from 10 frames to 31 frames
10. Improved Shooting Interval from 0.9 seconds down to 0.5 seconds.
11. EXR Processor II Lens Modulation Optimiser reduces diffraction
phenomenon and peripheral aberrations.
12. EXR Processor II features X-Trans processing & new noise reduction.
13. Outputs 14bit RAW files

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2013 at 06:21 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)

High ISO comparison between the Fuji X100S, Sony RX1, Leica M 240
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/x100shighbike.jpg
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/rx1highbikes.jpg
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/m240highbike.jpg

Sony RX1 + OVF = $3396
Sony RX1 + EVF = $3246
Leica M 240 = $6950
Fuji X100S = $1299

Nikon Coolpix A $1,096.95
Nikon DF-CP1 OPTICAL VIEWFINDER $379
Total $1475.65

Fuji X100S w/ hybrid viewfinder & hybrid auto focus & split image manual focus & focus peaking & F2 lens & X-Trans sensor. $1299

Sony RX1 vs Fujifilm X100s: side by side comparison
http://www.mikekobal.com/blog/?p=7208

^^^ Demonstrates the X100S having slightly faster auto focus than RX1

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2013 at 00:42 UTC as 58th comment | 1 reply

Would have liked 10mm on the wide end. But it should be another stellar, sharp, UWA from Tokina. Hopefully the flare isn't an issue.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 15, 2013 at 18:30 UTC as 27th comment
On Online images and copyright infringement article (255 comments in total)
In reply to:

wolfeel: The whole issue boils down to how much is her work worth?

Is it $40 as the station claims or is it $2,000 as she claims. If they cannot reach a settlement, she will have to pursue this matter through the small claims court. If I recall it costs $75 to file a claim. If she can convince the JP that her work sells for what she is asking for, the station will have no choice but to pay.

In the USA, the proper venue is a Federal court. A small claims court could accept the fee and take on the case, but it's the wrong venue. And if anyone tells the judge "wrong venue," that could be it for the case. You gotta get the venue right and that starts by selecting the right kind of lawyer, an intellectual property lawyer.

I don't know how it works in Canada.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2013 at 01:32 UTC
On Online images and copyright infringement article (255 comments in total)
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: My sympathies were with the photographer until I read the email stream. It seems the image was used by honest mistake for an extremely limited purpose and that a genuine apology and just compensation were offered. The photographer pushed for more and got pushed back.

That's not how it works.

I'm only knowledgeable with copyright laws in the united States, and here it's a Federal offense with the proper venue being a Federal court. It's a big deal here and I imagine it's a big deal in Canada too.

There was absolutely no mistake about it. The image was found on Google and used without permission.

If the radio station did nothing wrong, Scott would not have agreed to compensation, & ask Barbara to name her price.

The owner of the image can set her price, the station can accept or decline. The station declined to entertain her offer. Not surprising. The entire time the Radio station downplayed the severity of their illegal usage. The station is NOT in a position where they can call the shots.

I won't be surprised when the station wishes they would have paid her the $2000 when she asked because they might have to pay even more $$$ for lawyer fee's, etc, because the photographer doesn't look like she'll allow the station to take advantage of her.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2013 at 01:16 UTC
On Online images and copyright infringement article (255 comments in total)
In reply to:

bobbarber: Yes, they stole it.

It's awful hard to like the photographer, though.

Why? She's in the right, well she would be if this were the United States. I'm not sure about copyright laws in Canada. She should win because her image was stolen and the email transcripts show that it taken and used w/o permission.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 7, 2013 at 00:58 UTC

Please Fuji, I hope the 23mm manual focus isn't as sensitive as the 18mm and as easy to accidently move the focus ring while zone focusing. I love the f1.4 in the new 23mm. But I and many others will be using that lens on the street in manual zone focus at around F11 and we need to know the focus ring won't be so easy to accidently rotate. I shouldn't have to put rubber bands on my lenses to make the focus ring less sensitive.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 6, 2013 at 14:46 UTC as 30th comment
Total: 148, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »