rjx

rjx

Lives in United States Santa Clara USA, CA, United States
Works as a Odd person & noncontributing member of society
Joined on Oct 2, 2007
About me:

Learn as much about photography and create photographs people enjoy.

Comments

Total: 154, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

CatchAlive: So, photographers using sensors for taking pictures (using light or movement detection...) are not the author of their photo? Because it's movement/light/sound that release the shutter at the end... :-/

If I was to use your camera and I made a picture with it, I would be the copyright holder. Even though it was your equipment.

The pictures of the monkey were not taken by the owner of the camera / uploader, therefore wikipedia is within their rights.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2014 at 22:16 UTC
In reply to:

Valiant Thor: As I observe people and society I am 100% convinced that the smartphone is the worst invention in the history of the world, bar NONE. It has turned a once observant and interactive society into pathetic, electronic addicted, anti-social zombies who walk around with their glazed empty eyes affixed to those crappy little LCD boxes glued to their hand, their thumb frantically pushing stupid little chicklets around the screen with the look of a meth addict on their face and mortal fear in their mind that they would accidently miss one non-essential, meaningless message from an emotionless fellow zombie doing the same thing. They roam the malls dressed in jackass attire of distasteful, offensive, or sports related t-shirts, baggy silk exercise pants, bright Nike clown shoes, tattoos, and all the while radiating themselves with dangerous levels of packet-data microwave energy. The corporate illuminati puppet-masters must be laughing their billionaire butts off. Other than that, nice phone!

I agree with you!!

I look at it this way.
Many people with all their fancy gadgets under the illusion they're"connected," when in reality I feel they're really disconnected, walking around like zombies with their face looking down into their LCD, oblivious to everything around them. They're pathetic.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2014 at 03:39 UTC
In reply to:

Johannes Zander: Paper layers instead of Photoshop layers.

Brilliant idea!

This must be art!

I appreciate the hands on approach. Makes it more intimate to me. Probably is more enjoyable having everything out in the open in front of you instead of having to use a mouse or tab, zooming in and out, clicking, dragging, etc.

Doing something like this by hand makes it more of a "one of a kind" instead of being able to mass produce it with a sterile digital file.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2014 at 19:10 UTC
In reply to:

The Name is Bond: Gimmickry, not photography.

"Gimmickry, not photography."

More like creative, thought provoking, original, fresh, etc. A photographer that's saying something with his work instead of repeating the same old photos everyone else is doing.

Whether you like his work or not, at least he's trying to be original and doing a pretty good job at it. And this could lead to bigger and better things in the future that maybe you might actually appreciate.

If people like Michel Lamoller didn't take risks, photography would be pretty boring at times.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 3, 2014 at 19:05 UTC
On Flickr launches image marketplace initiative post (37 comments in total)
In reply to:

rjx: Dear Flickr,

Why the hell are images so slow to load when looking at photostreams? If I browse 500px.com, their images load MUCH faster than Flickr's. I really wish Flickr would do whatever 500px is doing and make their site faster.

47872Mike

Ever since Flickr's first big change last year, the justified layout loads slowly for me. I constantly need to wait for images to load.

500px, on the other hand, has a similar looking layout yet their images load quickly for me.

It would be nice if Flickr could do whatever 500px is doing regarding loading times.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2014 at 20:57 UTC
On Flickr launches image marketplace initiative post (37 comments in total)
In reply to:

rjx: Dear Flickr,

Why the hell are images so slow to load when looking at photostreams? If I browse 500px.com, their images load MUCH faster than Flickr's. I really wish Flickr would do whatever 500px is doing and make their site faster.

JDThomas

Cute response.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2014 at 20:50 UTC
On Canon India teases 'something big' coming soon article (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ulfric M Douglas: My money's on an Elephant.

Yeah, whatever it is will be big and heavy.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2014 at 20:46 UTC
On Canon India teases 'something big' coming soon article (150 comments in total)

LOL @ those thinking / hoping it's a new camera.

Canon wouldn't say, "get your camera ready" for a new camera. It's obviously not a camera.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 31, 2014 at 20:46 UTC as 49th comment
On Flickr launches image marketplace initiative post (37 comments in total)

Dear Flickr,

Why the hell are images so slow to load when looking at photostreams? If I browse 500px.com, their images load MUCH faster than Flickr's. I really wish Flickr would do whatever 500px is doing and make their site faster.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 29, 2014 at 23:50 UTC as 15th comment | 5 replies
On Fujifilm updates X-mount lens roadmap to end of 2015 article (170 comments in total)
In reply to:

rjx: Looks great!

But they need a tele 1:1 macro.

When Fuji released the 56mm, it had a wider aperture than they told us it would be. A nice surprise. I hope the 90mm is faster. Imagine if Fuji released the 90mm as a F1.4.

But a wide open 135mm F2 on full frame has a shallower DOF than a wide open 90mm F2 on a 1.5 crop.

And Nikon's 85mm F1.4 and Canon's 85mm F1.2 are nice on crop cameras, wide open.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 07:42 UTC
On Fujifilm updates X-mount lens roadmap to end of 2015 article (170 comments in total)

Looks great!

But they need a tele 1:1 macro.

When Fuji released the 56mm, it had a wider aperture than they told us it would be. A nice surprise. I hope the 90mm is faster. Imagine if Fuji released the 90mm as a F1.4.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 05:47 UTC as 32nd comment | 8 replies
In reply to:

Debankur Mukherjee: Some good news at last.......Nikon could have said and done this a year ago.........

Back in 2/26/14 Nikon released a statement finally acknowledging the D600 issues. 17 months after the camera was released.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2014/2/26/nikon-to-offer-d600-shutter-replacement-to-address-dust-issue?comment=0427814090

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2014 at 11:18 UTC

I hope they don't raise prices to make up for the $$$$ they lost due to their mistake.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2014 at 11:13 UTC as 51st comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

webrunner5: This camera is going to be a Canon 5D, Nikon D700 on steroids. Can't wait to get one.

I think people make too much of an issue regarding how loud a shutter is. Unless you're photographing people in a subway car or a bus, then I don't really see how this is an issue. The Leica cameras have pretty loud shutters and those cameras are used by many people getting real close to their subjects in sensitive candid situations and walking away with excellent captures. The Sony A7 series shutters aren't that loud.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 14:51 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T1 First Impressions Review preview (1645 comments in total)
In reply to:

nextSibling: I'm too invested in Nikon's system to be talked out of the D7100, but if that wasn't so this would be my new camera. Fuji are really on their game at the moment. Hopefully that'll encourage everyone else to raise theirs.

I understand that it's a pain to switch. But if you think switching to Fuji would help you enjoy photography more, then maybe it might be worth considering.

If you're in the US, Fuji is having a big sale on lenses. $150-$250 less than usual. Plus at BH, you can save an additional 4% off your purchase.

If anyone's going to switch to Fuji, now's the time to do it.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2014 at 03:20 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T1 First Impressions Review preview (1645 comments in total)
In reply to:

Tommot1965: Im not very impressed by the images that are hosted on DPR..most look soft the higher ISO images look softer still

Definitely not the camera's fault as we've seen with other user's examples.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2014 at 03:14 UTC

This camera was released 17 months ago and finally Nikon is addressing the issue.

Shame on them!!!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2014 at 06:15 UTC as 142nd comment
In reply to:

jonasvdlande: I don't get it. You take a fantastic portable camera, and screw on a giant lens to get to 50 mm. I would suggest you either buy a X-pro 1, or crop a little. I bought the X100-s for its simplicity. Works for 99% of the time. For the rest, I'll reluctantly carry my D800E (also not bad, but less user-friendly...)

Carrying both the X100S + 50mm converter is still a hell of a lot smaller and lighter than a one of the interchangeable Fuji camera with both the 24mm and 35mm. Plus much less $$$

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2014 at 10:35 UTC

Very proud of Fuji's success over the last 3ish years. Good for them. Boy have they gone beyond where I thought they be by this time.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 08:37 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

Ednaz: Would have preferred an XPro2 that had better OVF/EVF performance, smarter controls, faster internals and focus… I've got a 16mp EVF kit already (m4/3) with great lenses (Leica, Oly), smaller besides. This will probably be a great rig for people to get into mirror less, but if you're invested in a system - meaning a good selection of good (expensive) lenses, this isn't going to move you.

I do own the XPro1 and a number of the excellent Fuji lenses, but that's because of the OVF rangefinder. Performance of this will have a high bar for me… it'll take a lot to get me to spend on the X-T1 what I intended for an XPro2.

So, good for Fuji, good having a choice for those looking for something not as big and heavy as a DSLR. Just not right for me.

I agree with the X-PRO 2

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 08:34 UTC
Total: 154, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »