tritx

tritx

Joined on Oct 6, 2011

Comments

Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 article (341 comments in total)

Now its clear: "lets merge your cameras with our photocopiers!" Jobe done!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 06:31 UTC as 90th comment
On DPReview launches GearShop article (327 comments in total)
In reply to:

justmeMN: When they do camera reviews, Consumer Reports doesn't have any financial conflict of interest. The problem is, they don't know what they are talking about.

Web sites have advertisements, so there always has been some degree of conflict of interest.

My understanding is that camera companies send DPR cameras to review. That is also a conflict of interest. If DPR's review is too critical, they could stop sending them new cameras to review.

The real world is filled with conflicts of interest. That's the way it is. Deal with it.

I'm working in a car magazine. I know very well about those conflicts. But can you imagine a car magazine selling cars?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 18, 2013 at 00:14 UTC
On DPReview launches GearShop article (327 comments in total)

I see some very anxious replies from dpr team. I cant remember all these years such a busy day. The Boss must be pleased.
The end of an era! So simple, so sad.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 18, 2013 at 00:03 UTC as 96th comment
On DSC00292 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

just look at the shadow under the big metal tube at the front ot this picture. 24 MP, and JPG by Sony. Great.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 15, 2011 at 11:24 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

tritx: For all those MegaPixelManiacs:
18 is the right number. 5.200 pixels horizontaly. That means about 42 cm at 300 dpi. Guess what: that's the size of a two spreadsheet of a magazine.
The Pros (and of course Nikon) knows that for newspapers or even worse for the Internet, they do not need more than 12 or even less MP.
As for the landscapers: Do you REALLY print anything bigger than A3+? If you do, then you allready know that Medium Format is the way.
Right choice for Canon, for THAT kind of camera. And for THAT type of photographer. If they manage to have the big thing in IQ, they are in the right path.

Horses for courses. All I'm trying to say, is that maybe this camera is a turning point. We all know that we have more pixels and more detail that we ever imagine in film days (35 mm). At this point we need no more pixel, but BETTER pixels. So why dont we ask for a full frame sensor with mediuf format image quality?
I'm a car photogrrapher for the last 20 years, I have all around my house any kind of equipment you can name, and the only thing i want at this point is a good file (wider DR, good color, etc) to play with. An of course a reliable AF system. Either Canon or Nikon (just the two of them, if you are in business for your life). Just a tool to get the job done. Nothing more, nothing less.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2011 at 17:30 UTC

For all those MegaPixelManiacs:
18 is the right number. 5.200 pixels horizontaly. That means about 42 cm at 300 dpi. Guess what: that's the size of a two spreadsheet of a magazine.
The Pros (and of course Nikon) knows that for newspapers or even worse for the Internet, they do not need more than 12 or even less MP.
As for the landscapers: Do you REALLY print anything bigger than A3+? If you do, then you allready know that Medium Format is the way.
Right choice for Canon, for THAT kind of camera. And for THAT type of photographer. If they manage to have the big thing in IQ, they are in the right path.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2011 at 15:24 UTC as 87th comment | 5 replies
Total: 6, showing: 1 – 6